Australasian Colorectal Surgeons in the Modern Era: The Rise of Social Media

Matija Radojcic^1, , Michael Smits¹, Nilmini Wickramasinghe^{2, 3}, Nathan Lawrentschuk^{1, 4} and Philip Smart^{1, 5}

¹Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia

²Health Informatics, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

³Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

⁴UroRenal and Vascular Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

⁵Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Cite this paper:
Matija Radojcic, Michael Smits, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Nathan Lawrentschuk and Philip Smart. Australasian Colorectal Surgeons in the Modern Era: The Rise of Social Media. Global Journal of Surgery. 2018; 6(1):1-5. doi: 10.12691/js-6-1-1

Abstract

Background: Social media encompasses multiple forms of electronic communication where users create online communities to share ideas, information and other content. Social media use has grown rapidly, becoming important in surgical practice by providing opportunities for medical education and interaction with patients and colleagues. No study to date has looked at the uptake and prevalence of social media use amongst colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). Aim: To assess the use of websites and social media by all practicing colorectal surgeons in Australia and NZ. Methodology: All members of the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and NZ (CSSANZ) were identified. Comprehensive searches of websites and social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube and ResearchGate) were undertaken to record the presence of a private website or social media account. Factors that were examined included the sex of the surgeon, years in practice and geographical location of the surgeon. Results: There were 230 practicing colorectal surgeons in Australia and NZ as of December 2017. 80% of surgeons had a private website, of which 20% were ‘single surgeon’ websites. 68% of surgeons had at least one type of social media account. The most widely-used social media platform was LinkedIn (55% of surgeons). 25% of surgeons had a Facebook account and 31% had a Research Gate profile. Nine percent of surgeons were on Twitter whilst less than 2% were on YouTube. There was no difference between the sexes in use of websites or uptake of social media. NZ surgeons were more engaged with LinkedIn than their Australian peers. Younger surgeons were more likely to use social media. Conclusion: Colorectal surgeons in Australia and NZ are users of multiple social media platforms and have a strong online presence. There is potential for further uptake of social media which could enhance surgeon-patient and surgeon-surgeon interaction and education.

Keywords:
social media internet colorectal surgery medical education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	McGowan B.S., Wasko M., Vartabedian B.S., Miller R.S., Freiherr D.D., Abdolrasulnia M., “Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information,” J Med Internet Res, 14 (5). 117. Sep. 2012.
[2]	Statista, “Global time spent on social networking by internet users worldwide from 2012 to 2017,” https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/ (accessed December 2017).
[3]	Similar Web, “November 2017 Overview,” https://www.similarweb.com/website/facebook.com (accessed December 2017).
[4]	Cochrane A.R., McDonald J.J., Brady R.R., “Social media use among United Kingdom Vascular Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study,” Ann Vasc Surg, 33. 252-7. May. 2016.
[5]	Davies N., Murphy D.G., van Rij S., Woo H.H., Lawrentschuk N., “Online and social media presence of Australian and New Zealand urologists,” BJU Int, 116 (6). 984-9. Dec. 2015.
[6]	Lui D.H., McDonald J.J., de Beaux A., Tulloh B., Brady R.R.W., “Contemporary engagement with social media amongst hernia surgery specialists,” Hernia, 21 (4). 509-515. Aug. 2017.
[7]	Mabvuure N.T., Rodrigues J., Klimach S., Nduka C., “A cross-sectional study of the presence of United Kingdom (UK) plastic surgeons on social media,” J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 67 (3). 362-7. Mar. 2014.
[8]	McDonald J.J., Bisset C., Coleman M.G., Speake D., Brady R.R., “Contemporary use of social media by consultant colorectal surgeons,” Colorectal Dis, 17 (2). Feb. 2015.
[9]	McEvenue G., Copeland A., Devon K.M., Semple J.L., “How Social Are We? A Cross-Sectional Study of the Website Presence and Social Media Activity of Canadian Plastic Surgeons,” Aesthet Surg J, 36 (9). Oct. 2016.
[10]	Australian Medical Association, “Social Media and the Medical Profession. A guide to online professionalism for medical practitioners and medical students,” https://ama.com.au/system/tdf/documents/Social_Media_and_the_Medical_Profession_FINAL_with_links_0.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=35198 (Accessed December 2017).
[11]	Medical Council of New Zealand, “Statement on use of the internet and electronic communication,” https://www.mcnz.org.nz/assets/News-and-Publications/Statement-on-use-of-the-internet-and-electronic-communication-v2.pdf (Accessed December 2017).
[12]	Steele S.R., Arshad S., Bush R., Dasani S., Cologne K., Bleier J.I., Raphaeli T., Kelz R.R., “Social media is a necessary component of surgery practice,” Surgery, 158 (3). Sep. 2015.
[13]	Brown J., Ryan C., Harris A., “How doctors view and use social media: a national survey,” J Med Internet Res, 16 (12). 267. Dec. 2014.
[14]	Brady R.R.W., Chapman S.J., Atallah S., Chand M., Mayol J., Lacy A.M., Wexner S.D., “#colorectal surgery,” Br J Surg, 104 (11). 1470-1476. Oct. 2017.
[15]	Wexner S.D., Petrucci A.M., Brady R.R., Ennis-O'Connor M., Fitzgerald J.E., Mayol J., “Social media in colorectal surgery,” Colorectal Dis, 19 (2). 105-114. Feb. 2017.
[16]	Eysenbach G., “Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact,” J Med Internet Res, 13 (4). 23. Dec. 2011.
[17]	Peoples B.K., Midway S.R., Sackett D., Lynch A., Cooney P.B., “Twitter Predicts Citation Rates of Ecological Research,” PLoS One, 11 (11). e0166570. Nov. 2016.
[18]	Van Noorden R., “Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network,” Nature, 512 (7513). 126-9. Aug. 2014.
[19]	Ibrahim A.M., Varban O.A., Dimick J.B., “Novel uses of video to accelerate the surgical learning curve,” J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 26 (4). 240-2. Apr. 2016.
[20]	Carter S.C., Chiang A., Shah G., Kwan L., Montgomery J.S., Karam A., Tarnay C., Guru K.A., Hu J.C., “Video-based peer feedback through social networking for robotic surgery simulation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial,” Ann Surg, 261 (5). 870-5. May. 2015.
[21]	Jacob B.P., “International Hernia Collaboration,” Facebook, www.facebook.com/groups/herniacollab/. Published 2012. (Accessed December 2017).
[22]	Kudsi O.Y. “R,obotic Surgery Collaboration.,” Facebook, www.facebook.com/groups/15227779313.38325/(Accessed December 2017).
[23]	Mansfield S.J., Morrison S.G., Stephens HO, Bonning M.A., Wang S.H., Withers A.H., Olver R.C., Perry A.W., “Social media and the medical profession,” Med J Aust, 194 (12). 624-4. Jun. 2011.