Intestinal Obstruction from Transmural Migration of Retained Abdominal Sponge

Olaomi Oluwole Olayemi^1, , Ameh Emmanuel¹, Badejo Olawale A¹ and Cebawaza Brian¹

¹Department of Surgery, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria

Cite this paper:
Olaomi Oluwole Olayemi, Ameh Emmanuel, Badejo Olawale A and Cebawaza Brian. Intestinal Obstruction from Transmural Migration of Retained Abdominal Sponge. Global Journal of Surgery. 2014; 2(3):34-36. doi: 10.12691/js-2-3-1

Abstract

Retained surgical foreign bodies are uncommon iatrogenic surgical complication which may have serious consequences on the patient, embarrass the care givers and the involved institution. This is a report a 39 year old woman presenting with intestinal obstruction 6 weeks after a Caesarian section. A Laparotomy was done 10 days before presentation without resolving the obstruction. At re-Laparotomy, a retained abdominal surgical sponge was removed from the lumen of the terminal ileum. She has remained well at 24 months of follow up. Transmural migration of retained abdominal sponge is unusual and should be considered as a differential diagnosis in any patient presenting with features of intestinal obstruction in who has had previous laparotomy. The mechanism and efforts at prevention are discussed.

Keywords:
abdominal surgical sponge retained transmural migration intestinal obstruction

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, et al: Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 229-235.
[2]	Hyslop JW, Maull KI: Natural history of the retained surgical sponge. South Med J 1982; 75: 657-660.
[3]	Lincourt AE, Harrell A, Cristiano J, Sechrist C, Kercher K, Heniford BT. Retained foreign bodies after surgery. J Surg Res 2007; 138: 170-174.
[4]	Mouhsine E, Halkic N, Garofalo R, et al: Soft-tissue textiloma: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Can J Surg 2005; 48: 495-496.
[5]	Stawicki S.P, Evans D.C, Cipolla J et al: Retained surgical foreign bodies: a comprehensive review of risks and preventive strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 98: 8-17, 2009.
[6]	Imren Y, Tasoglu I, Ozkose Z: A different intracardiac mass: retained sponge. Echocardiography 2006; 23: 322-323.
[7]	Dhillon J.S and Park A, “Transmural migration of a retained laparotomy sponge,” American Surgeon, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 603-605, 2002.
[8]	Greenberg C.C., et al.: Bar-coding surgical sponges to improve safety: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 247: 612-616, Apr. 2008.
[9]	Macario A., Morris D., Morris S.: Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology. Arch Surg 141: 659-662, Jul. 2006.