The Accuracy of Early Post-Operative Abdominal CT Scan

Michael Shpoliansky^1, , Yehonatan Nevo¹, Yoram Klein² and Michal Amitai³

¹Department of Surgery and Transplantation B, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel

²Division of Trauma, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel

³Department of Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Cite this paper:
Michael Shpoliansky, Yehonatan Nevo, Yoram Klein and Michal Amitai. The Accuracy of Early Post-Operative Abdominal CT Scan. Global Journal of Surgery. 2019; 7(1):19-25. doi: 10.12691/js-7-1-4

Abstract

Background: Data is lacking regarding the optimal CT timing for diagnosing intra-abdominal post-operative complications. Our aim was to examine the accuracy of CT imaging performed in the early post-operative period (POD 1-5) compared to late post-operative period (POD 6-14), in the detection of post-operative complications. Methods: Post-operative CT scans performed in the first 14 days following abdominal surgery, between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed and divided into two groups: early CT scans performed at POD 1-5 and late CT scans performed at POD 6-14. Analysis included clinical and laboratory parameters, radiologic findings and assessment of post-operative course according to CT scan results. Results: 318 CT scans were performed. The rate of repeated CT scans was higher in the patients included in the early CT scan group compared to the late CT scan group (23.1% vs. 11.2%, p=0.013). There were more re-operations in the early CT group, with no statistical difference (12.8% vs. 7.9%, p=0.23), whereas drainage procedures were more frequent in the late CT group (22.1% vs. 9.0%, p=0.008). Early CT scans were less sensitive in detecting post-operative GI complications (56% vs. 73%, p=0.018). The accuracy to detect post-operative complications was similar between the groups (83% vs. 88%, p=0.42). Conclusion: CT scans performed in the early post-operative period are less sensitive and tend to necessitate repeated scans. The accuracy of abdominal CT examination in detecting post-operative GI complications was not found to be statistically different between the early and late CT scan groups.

Keywords:
format microsoft word template style insert template

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C, Hughes WJ, Koorey SG, Brewer D, Newland RC: Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Diseases of the colon and rectum 1995, 38(5): 480-486; discussion 486-487.
[2]	Kingham TP, Pachter HL: Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2009, 208(2): 269-278.
[3]	Power N, Atri M, Ryan S, Haddad R, Smith A: CT assessment of anastomotic bowel leak. Clinical radiology 2007, 62(1): 37-42.
[4]	DuBrow RA, David CL, Curley SA: Anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: evaluation with CT and barium enema. AJR American journal of roentgenology 1995, 165(3): 567-571.
[5]	Gayer G, Jonas T, Apter S, Amitai M, Shabtai M, Hertz M: Postoperative pneumoperitoneum as detected by CT: prevalence, duration, and relevant factors affecting its possible significance. Abdominal imaging 2000, 25(3):301-305.
[6]	Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G: Computed tomography findings of early abdominal postoperative complications. Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes 2007, 58(3):136-145.
[7]	Kim KW, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim TK, Kim AY, Lee HJ, Kim YH, Choi JI, Do KH, Kim HC et al: Postoperative anatomic and pathologic findings at CT following gastrectomy. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 2002, 22(2):323-336.
[8]	Nicksa GA, Dring RV, Johnson KH, Sardella WV, Vignati PV, Cohen JL: Anastomotic leaks: what is the best diagnostic imaging study? Diseases of the colon and rectum 2007, 50(2): 197-203.
[9]	Kornmann VN, Treskes N, Hoonhout LH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D: Systematic review on the value of CT scanning in the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. International journal of colorectal disease 2013, 28(4): 437-445.
[10]	Kornmann VN, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB, Bollen TL, Boerma D: Beware of false-negative CT scan for anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. International journal of colorectal disease 2014, 29(4): 445-451.
[11]	Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG: Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. The British journal of surgery 2001, 88(9): 1157-1168.
[12]	Khoury W, Ben-Yehuda A, Ben-Haim M, Klausner JM, Szold O: Abdominal computed tomography for diagnosing postoperative lower gastrointestinal tract leaks. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2009, 13(8): 1454-1458.
[13]	Sandrasegaran K, Maglinte DD: Imaging of small bowel-related complications following major abdominal surgery. European journal of radiology 2005, 53(3): 374-386.
[14]	Antevil JL, Egan JC, Woodbury RO, Rivera L, Oreilly EB, Brown CV: Abdominal computed tomography for postoperative abscess: is it useful during the first week? Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2006, 10(6): 901-905.
[15]	Fike FB, Mortellaro VE, Juang D, Sharp SW, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD: The impact of postoperative abscess formation in perforated appendicitis. The Journal of surgical research 2011, 170(1): 24-26.
[16]	Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Srinivasa S, Bissett IP, Hill AG: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery. Annals of surgery 2011, 253(1):35-43.