Acceptability and Development of Chemistry Lessons Integrating Conceptual Change Argument-Driven Inquiry (CCADI)

Merogim P. Mugot^{1, 2,} and Maria Teresa M. Fajardo¹

¹University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

²Department of Education, El Salvador City Division, El Salvador City, Misamis Oriental, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Merogim P. Mugot and Maria Teresa M. Fajardo. Acceptability and Development of Chemistry Lessons Integrating Conceptual Change Argument-Driven Inquiry (CCADI). Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning. 2025; 5(1):12-18. doi: 10.12691/jitl-5-1-3

Abstract

The integration of inquiry-based learning within classroom instruction is increasingly prevalent due to its potential to enhance students' critical thinking abilities while facilitating an engaging learning experience. This study aimed to develop lessons that incorporate conceptual change argument-driven inquiry activities, and to assess their acceptability based on criteria including content, format, presentation, and organization, as well as the accuracy and currency of information. Employing a Research and Development (R&D) methodology, the objective was to produce effective instructional materials that enhance lesson development through the integration of these inquiry activities. The findings indicate that the average scores for the respective evaluation criteria were 3.77 for content, 3.51 for format, 3.43 for presentation and organization, and 3.49 for accuracy and currency. These scores suggest a high level of acceptance across all criteria. Consequently, the developed lessons are deemed suitable for implementation in senior high schools, specifically within grade 11 chemistry courses. Furthermore, these lessons are designed to promote essential 21st-century skills. Educators are strongly encouraged to incorporate the argument-driven learning method into their pedagogical practices, as it has been recognized for its enjoyable, engaging, and learner-centered approach.

Keywords:
chemistry lessons conceptual change argument-driven inquiry

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Anam, R. S., Gumilar, S., & Widodo, A. (2023). The Use of the Constructivist Teaching Sequence (CTS) to Facilitate Changes in the Visual Representations of Fifth-Grade Elementary School Students: A Case Study on Teaching Heat Convection Concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-27.
[2]	Mugot, M. P., & Fajardo, M. T. M. Technological, Pedagogical, and Sceince Knowledge (TPASK) of Public School Science Teachers. Sci. Int. (Lahore), 33(3), 263-269, 2021.
[3]	Arman, I. M. D. (2020). Effectiveness of B lending the Posner and Stepans Models of Conceptual Change in Correcting Misconceptions in 9th Grade Students. https:// dspace. alquds.edu/ handle/20.500.12213/5720.
[4]	Stevens, A. L., & Collins, A. (2021). Multiple conceptual models of a complex system. In Aptitude, learning, and instruction (pp. 177-198). Routledge.
[5]	Rohmah, R. S., & Virtayanti, I. A. (2021). Effect of conceptual change text on basic chemistry students’ understanding of acid and base in online learning. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
[6]	Achor, E. E., & Abuh, P. Y. (2020). Fostering students’ academic performance in physics using cognitive conflict instructional strategy and conceptual change pedagogy. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 42-57. 10.31763/ijele.v2i1.118.
[7]	Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ezema, M. J., & Orji, E. I. (2023). Evaluating the Instructional Efficacies of Conceptual Change Models on Students’ Conceptual Change Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Particulate Nature Matter in Physics. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440231153851.
[8]	Arslan, H. O., Genc, M., & Durak, B. (2023). Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103905.
[9]	Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, F. (2022). The Efficiency of Argument-Based Inquiry Practices in Science Teacher Candidate Education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 721-757.
[10]	Alfarraj, Y. F., Aldahmash, A. H., & Omar, S. H. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on teaching science through an argumentation-driven inquiry model: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon, 9(9).
[11]	Tekindur, A., & Kingir, S. (2023). Improving Elementary Students’ Science Achievement, Inquiry and Scientific Writing Skills through Argument-Based Inquiry. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1-22.
[12]	Jin, Q., & Kim, M. (2021). Supporting elementary students’ scientific argumentation with argument-focused metacognitive scaffolds (AMS). International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1984-2006.
[13]	Walker, J. P., Van Duzor, A. G., & Lower, M. A. (2019). Facilitating argumentation in the laboratory: The challenges of claim change and justification by theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), 435-444.
[14]	Dawson, V. (2024). Teachers’ support in developing year 7 students’ argumentation skills about water-based socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 46(3), 222-239.
[15]	Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., & Hong, Z. R. (2019). Bridging the gender gap of children’s engagement in learning science and argumentation through a modified argument-driven inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 635-655.
[16]	Rahayu, I., Widhiyanti, T., & Mulyani, S. (2024). Analysis of Misconceptions on the Factors that Affect the Reaction Rate. KnE Social Sciences, 140-150.
[17]	Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, F. (2022). The Efficiency of Argument-Based Inquiry Practices in Science Teacher Candidate Education. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(4), 721-757.
[18]	Achor, E. E., & Abuh, P. Y. (2020). Fostering students’ academic performance in physics using cognitive conflict instructional strategy and conceptual change pedagogy. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 42-57. 10.31763/ijele.v2i1.118.
[19]	Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ezema, M. J., & Orji, E. I. (2023). Evaluating the Instructional Efficacies of Conceptual Change Models on Students’ Conceptual Change Achievement and Self-Efficacy in Particulate Nature Matter in Physics. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440231153851.
[20]	Wilujeng, I., & Hidayatullah, Z. (2021). Alternative learning model in physics learning: Effect of the conceptual change model with cognitive conflict on critical thinking skill. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 111-120.
[21]	Selviana, A. S., & Sunarno, W. (2022). The Effectiveness of Using Physics Module with Problem-Based Learning to Enhance Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 19-25.
[22]	McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). Students’ understanding of the emergent processes of natural selection: The need for ontological conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1485-1502.
[23]	Picardal, M. T. (2019). Does Conceptual Change Process of Instruction Promote Scientific Understanding of Biological Evolution?. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 15(2).
[24]	Putri, S. R. S., & Sukarmin, S. (2020). Software Development to Reduce Misconceptions Using Conceptual Change Text Strategy on Chemical Bonding Matter. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 10-16.
[25]	Tella, A., & Ogundiya, T. A. (2022). Effects of Concept Mapping and Guided Discovery Instructional Strategies on Students' Achievement in Redox Concept of Chemistry in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business, 14(2). 10.5815/ijieeb.2022.02.05.
[26]	Swafiyah, B., Muhammad, B. A., & Yamusa, A. Z. (2023). Effect of Conceptual Change Instructional Strategy on Chemistry Students' Performance in Acids and Bases Concepts. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 2(1), 47-54.
[27]	Nurpatri, Y., Muliani, D., & Indrawati, E. S. (2021, April). Implementation of constructivism approach in physics learning on students’ critical thinking ability of junior high school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1876, No. 1, p. 012068). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012068.
[28]	Putra, G. D., Samsudin, A., & Saepuzaman, D. (2019, November). Computer simulation-assisted conceptual change text (CS-CCT): a FODEM study on fluid dynamics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, No. 5, p. 052045). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052045.
[29]	Sari, N. A., Santyasa, I. W., & Gunadi, I. G. A. (2021). The effect of conceptual change models on students' conceptual understanding in learning physics. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 17(2), 94-105.
[30]	Palisoa, N., Lumamuly, V. E., & Lumamuly, A. (2023, January). Advance organizer integrated conceptual change learning model to prevent potential misconceptions of high school students in chemical concept. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2642, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
[31]	Rahmat, G., Muhammad, H., & Hafnati, R. (2021, September). The Application of the Conceptual Change Learning Model Combined with Predict-Observe-Explain to Overcome Student Misconceptions on Chemical Bonds. In 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Modern Society (ICSTMS 2020) (pp. 151-156). Atlantis Press. 10.2991/ assehr.k.210909.035.
[32]	Tella, A., & Ogundiya, T. A. (2022). Effects of Concept Mapping and Guided Discovery Instructional Strategies on Students' Achievement in Redox Concept of Chemistry in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business, 14(2). 10.5815/ijieeb.2022.02.05.
[33]	Arslan, H. O., Genc, M., & Durak, B. (2023). Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103905.
[34]	Department of Education. (2009). Guidelines and processes for LRMDS assessment and evaluation. March. https:// lrmds. deped.gov.ph/docs/LRMDSGuidelines.pdf.
[35]	Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 56.
[36]	Dini, V., Sevian, H., Caushi, K., & Orduña Picón, R. (2020). Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers. Science Education, 104(2), 290-325.
[37]	Kazempour, M., Amirshokoohi, A., & Blamey, K. (2020). Putting Theory to Practice: Teaching the 5E Learning Cycle through Immersive Experiences for Pre-Service Teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 67-75.
[38]	Adam, U. A., Lameed, S., & Ayodele, B. B. (2022). Attaining meaningful learning of ecological concept: A test of the efficacy of 7e learning cycle model. IJER-International Journal of Educational Research, 5(04), 18–29.
[39]	Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lu, Y. Y., & Hong, Z. R. (2019). Bridging the gender gap of children’s engagement in learning science and argumentation through a modified argument-driven inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 635-655.
[40]	Correia, C. F., & Harrison, C. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based learning and its impact on formative assessment practice. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(3), 355–376.
[41]	Gholam, A. P. (2019). Inquiry-based learning: Student teachers’ challenges and perceptions. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 16(1), 6.
[42]	Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC medical education, 19, 1-13.
[43]	DepEd. (2022). Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs).