Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): 2945-4638 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jitl Editor-in-chief: Laila S. Lomibao
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning. 2023, 3(1), 15-18
DOI: 10.12691/jitl-3-1-3
Open AccessArticle

Line by Line Hints vs. Repeated Parallel Questioning Feedbacks on Grade 7 Students’ Mathematics Achievement

Chamae B. Capito1, Lance Kenneth R. Borres1, Cindy Mae U. Torayno1, Milcah Junice S. Bokingkito1 and Maria Antonieta A. Bacabac1,

1Department of Mathematics Education, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Pub. Date: April 26, 2023

Cite this paper:
Chamae B. Capito, Lance Kenneth R. Borres, Cindy Mae U. Torayno, Milcah Junice S. Bokingkito and Maria Antonieta A. Bacabac. Line by Line Hints vs. Repeated Parallel Questioning Feedbacks on Grade 7 Students’ Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning. 2023; 3(1):15-18. doi: 10.12691/jitl-3-1-3

Abstract

This study examined the use of line-by-line hints and repeated parallel questions as feedback mechanisms to promote students’ mathematics achievement. These methods were already proven effective when applied to modular distance learning, however, after a literature review, it was found that there has yet to be a study conducted where these methods were applied during face-to-face classes. The participants were the Grade 7 students of Misamis Oriental General Comprehensive High School (MOGCHS) during the school year 2022–2023. Two intact classes were randomly assigned as Experimental Group 1, which was exposed to line-by-line hint feedback, and Experimental Group 2, which was treated with the repeated parallel question method during the experiment. Using a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental research design, a 30-item researcher-made test in algebra focusing on rational numbers up to subsets of real numbers served as the main instrument of the study. The students' performance was measured using their achievement test scores. To determine the students’ level of achievement, descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were utilized, while a one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to determine if there was a significant difference between these two feedback methods on the students’ mathematics achievement during face-to-face classes. The results of the analysis revealed that line-by-line hints were more successful in improving students' performance than the repeated parallel question method. It offers more support in correcting student misconceptions. Thus, the researchers recommend the use of this kind of feedback to mathematics teachers at all levels, for it is more effective in enhancing students’ mathematics achievement and encourages students' active participation in the feedback process.

Keywords:
feedback repeated parallel question line-by-line hints mathematics achievement

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Zayed, A. (2019). A New Perspective on the Role of Mathematics in Medicine. Journal of Advanced Research. Vol 17.
 
[2]  Cabang, F.I. and Roble, D. (2022)“Strengths of Formative Feedbacks with Line by Line Hints & Repeated Parallel Question on Promoting Students’ Mathematics Achievement.” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 2: 73-80.
 
[3]  Hattie, J., (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maintaining Impact on Learning. New York: Routledge.
 
[4]  Guinness, K., Detrich, R., Keyworth, R. & States, J. (2020). Overview of Corrective Feedback. Oakland, CA: The Wing Institute. https://www.winginstitute.org/instructional-delivery-feedback.
 
[5]  Handley, K., & Williams, L. (2011). From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 95-108.
 
[6]  Irons A (2008) Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback: Key Guides for Effective Teaching in Higher Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
 
[7]  Gould J and Day P (2013) Hearing you loud and clear: Student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38(5): 554-66.
 
[8]  Bringula, R., de Leon, J. S., Rayala, K. J., Pascual, B. A., & Sendino, K. (2017). Effects on different types of feedback of a mobile-assisted learning application and motivation towards mathematics learning on students’ mathematics performance. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 13(3), 241-259.
 
[9]  Corbalan, G., Paas, F., & Cuypers, H (2010). Computer-based feedback in linear algebra: Effects on transfer performance and motivation. Computers and Education, 55(2).
 
[10]  Lodder, J., Heeren, B., Jeuring, J., & Neijenhuis, W. (2021). Generation and Use of Hints and Feedback in a Hilbert-Style Axiomatic Proof Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(1), 99-133.
 
[11]  Wang, W., Rao,U., Zhi, R., Marwan, S., Gao, G., & Price, T. W. (2020). Step Tutor: Supporting Students through Step-byStep Example-Based Feedback. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE.