Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health
ISSN (Print): 2334-3397 ISSN (Online): 2334-3494 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jephh Editor-in-chief: Dibyendu Banerjee
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health. 2017, 5(2), 62-68
DOI: 10.12691/jephh-5-2-3
Open AccessArticle

Menace of Asbestos: Health Impact and Politics

Olugbenga Akindele Silas1, Robert L. Murphy2, Ayuba I. Zoaka3 and Lucius Chidiebere Imoh4,

1Pathology Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Jos, Nigeria

2Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University and Center for Global Health Chicago, USA

3Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Jos/Jos University Teaching Hospital Plateau State, Nigeria

4Chemical Pathology Department, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Pub. Date: June 19, 2017

Cite this paper:
Olugbenga Akindele Silas, Robert L. Murphy, Ayuba I. Zoaka and Lucius Chidiebere Imoh. Menace of Asbestos: Health Impact and Politics. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health. 2017; 5(2):62-68. doi: 10.12691/jephh-5-2-3

Abstract

Background: Asbestos is identified as a hazardous substance of public health concern and has led to its regulation or ban in many countries. Local and international politics have hampered the regulation and outright ban of this hazardous substance in many countries. While UK and USA did not out rightly ban but regulated its use, most developing countries continue in the production, sale and use of asbestos mostly due to economic reasons. The objective of this review is to identify previous publications on asbestos highlighting health effects and politics bordering its regulation. Also to recommend measures to curtail its production, use and sale especially in developing countries. Methods: A systematic review to identify suitable studies from MEDLINE and Electronic search through GOOGLE for original, review articles and documents on politics, law and health effects of asbestos. A total of 19 articles and online documents were finally selected and reviewed after screening out those not falling within the inclusion criteria. Results: The materials used in this review highlight the negative health impact of asbestos in various countries. Factors identified as militating against effective regulation or ban of this hazardous substance in many counties includes politics, economic gain, ignorance and unavailability of safe asbestos substitutes. Conclusion: Though the production and sale of asbestos have decreased in many developed countries, many developing countries still trade in this hazardous substance with its attendant health consequences. Increased political will, continuous research on health impact and financial aid to developing nations to acquire alternatives will help to reduce the menace of asbestos.

Keywords:
asbestos abatement politics mesotheliomas asbestos-related diseases developing countries

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Asbetos and natural disasters. Available from: https://www.asbestos.com/asbestos/natural-disasters/. Assessed on 6th May 2016.
 
[2]  Copland JR. Asbestos 2004. Available from http://www.pointoflaw.com/asbestos/overview.php. Assessed on 6th May 2016.
 
[3]  Madkour MT, Bokhary MSE, Allah HIA, Awad AA, Mahmoud HF. Environmental exposure to asbestos and the exposure-response relationship with mesothelioma. East Mediterr Health J. 2009; 1: 25-38.
 
[4]  Mollo F, Magnani C, Bo P, CravelloM. The attribution of lung cancers to asbestos exposure: a pathologic study of 924 unselected cases. Am J ClinPathol. 2002; 117:90-95.
 
[5]  Landrigani PJ, Nicholsoni W J, Suzuki1 Y, Ladou J. The Hazards of Chrysotile Asbestos: A Critical Review. Industrial Health 1999, 37, 271-280.
 
[6]  Cagle PT. Tumors of the lung (excluding lymphoid tumors). In: Thurlbeck WM, Churg AM, ed. Pathology of the Lung. 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1995: 437-551.
 
[7]  Gaensler EA, McLoud TC, Carrington CB. Thoracic surgical problems in asbestos-related disorders. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985; 40: 82-96.
 
[8]  [ATSDR] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Case Studies In Environmental Medicine (CSEM): Asbestos Toxicity. Atlanta GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2001. Available from: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/asbestos_2014/docs/asbestos.pdf. Assessed on 5th may, 2017.
 
[9]  Antao VC, Pinheiro G, Wassell J. Asbestosis mortality in the USA: facts and predictions. Occup Environ Med. 2009; 66:335-338.
 
[10]  NIOSH 2014. Work-Related Lung Disease Surveillance System (eWoRLD). 2014-748 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Respiratory Health Division, Morgantown, WV. Available at: <https://wwwn.cdc.gov/eworld/Data/748> May 4, 2017.
 
[11]  Asbestos use in the US military-Asbestos network, 2016. www.asbestosnetwork.com/blog/2016/.../asbestos-use-in-the-united-states-military.sht. Assessed on the 24th of February 2017.
 
[12]  Copland J, 2004. PointofLaw.com.
 
[13]  Doll R, Peto R. The Causes of Cancer, 1981. Oxford, England: Oxford Medical Publications: 1238-1245, 1305-1308.
 
[14]  Raloff, J. “Dirty Little Secret”. Science News. 2006; 170 (2): 26-28.
 
[15]  Braun L, Kisting S,. Asbestos-Related Disease in South Africa; The Social Production of an Invisible Epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96 (8): 1386-1396.
 
[16]  Joshi TK, Gupta RK. Asbestos in Developing Countries: Magnitude Of Risk and its Practical Implications. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 2004; 17(1): 179-185.
 
[17]  Hwang SH, Park WM .Evaluation of asbestos-containing products and released fibers in home appliances. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016; Sep; 66(9): 922-9.
 
[18]  Brown TA, Holian A, Pinkerton KE, Lee JW, Cho YH. Early life exposure to environmental tobacco smoke alters immune response to asbestos via a shift in inflammatory phenotype resulting in increased disease development. Toxicol. 2016; 28 (11), 514-519.
 
[19]  Lotter JT, Roberts B, Henshaw JL, Pierce JS. Airborne Asbestos Exposures Associated with the Installation and Removal of Roofing Products. J Occup Env Hygine. 2016; 28:1-35.
 
[20]  Baur X. Asbestos: Socio-legal and Scientific Controversies and Unsound Science in the Context of the Worldwide Asbestos Tragedy - Lessons to be Learned. Pnuemologie. 2016; 28; 70(6): 405-12.
 
[21]  Marchevsky AM, Wick MR. Current controversies regarding the role of asbestos exposure in the causation of malignant mesothelioma: the need for an evidence-based approach to develop medico legal guidelines. Annal of DiagnPathol. 2003; 5: 321-32.
 
[22]  Collegium Ramazzini. Comments on the 2014 Helsinki consensus report on asbestos. Industrial Health. 2016; 54 (1): 94-97.
 
[23]  18 th COLLEGIUM RAMAZZINI 2016.Comments on the Helsinki consensus report on asbestos. J of Occupational Health. J Stage. 1: 86-90.
 
[24]  Asbestos and the Law. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos_and_the_law#cite_note-pointoflaw-45. Assessed on 28th December, 2016.
 
[25]  Igbinedion D. ASBESTOS: A Silent Killer in Nigeria. Availabe from: http://www.gamji.com/article3000/NEWS3602.htm. Assessed on 28th December 2016.