Climate Change in South Asia: A Framework of Sustainable Development and Human Security

Chanchal Kumar^1,

¹Department of Political Science, Janki Devi Memorial College, University of Delhi, India

Cite this paper:
Chanchal Kumar. Climate Change in South Asia: A Framework of Sustainable Development and Human Security. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health. 2014; 2(5):100-109. doi: 10.12691/jephh-2-5-2

Abstract

Climate change is increasingly been called a ‘human security’ problem, and there has been speculation that climate change may increase the risk of violent conflict. The broad contours of a research programme to guide empirical investigations into the risks climate change poses to human security and peace. It is now increasingly realised that even with the currently agreed regime of emissions control, concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) are likely to rise over the next few decades and over the millennia. Climate change is likely to threaten all life forms on earth with the extent of vulnerability varying across regions and populations within regions. Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns and numerous other factors will impact both natural and human systems. Climate sensitive sectors like agriculture, forestry, water resources and coastal regions, and, human systems including human health, human settlements, in dustry and energy sectors will be drastically affected. The South Asian experience can contribute to the larger literature on environment and security and, more particularly, to the literature on human security and sustainable development. It argues that chronic and structural impoverishment—rather than resource scarcity alone— forges the connection between environmental degradation and conflict. It also suggests that poverty and weak institutions of governance are the more immediate triggers of environmental insecurity.

Keywords:
climate change human security sustainable development South Asia international cooperation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Alkire, S. (2002). Conceptual framework for the Commission on Human Security. Retrieved 29 October 2010, from http://www.humansecurity-chs.org/doc/frame.html.
[2]	Barnett, J. (2007). Environmental Security and Peace. Journal of Human Security, 3(1), 4-16.
[3]	Bowers, C. A. (1993). Education, cultural myths, and the ecological crisis: Toward deep changes. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[4]	Catton, W. R. Jr. (1980). Overshoot: The ecological basis of revolutionary change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
[5]	Chambers, N., Simmons C., &Wackernagel, M. (2000). Sharing nature’s interest: ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. London: Earthscan Publ. Ltd.
[6]	Curry, P. (2006). Ecological Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
[7]	Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B. (1994). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.
[8]	Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. London: Viking Penguin.
[9]	Ehrlich, P. R., &Holdren, J. (1971). The Impact of Population Grow.
[10]	Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191.
[11]	Global Footprint Network. (2009). Ecological Footprint Atlas. http://www.footprintnetwork.org Gordon, A., & Suzuki, D. (1990). It’s a matter of survival. Sydney, Australia: Allen &Unwin.
[12]	Griffin, K. (1995). Global prospects for development and human security. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, XVI(3), 359-370.
[13]	Homer-Dixon, T. (1999). Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[14]	Lautensach, A. K. (2006). Expanding Human Security. Journal of Human Security, 2(3), 5-14.
[15]	Lautensach, A. (2009). Teaching Values through the Ecological Footprint. Green Theory and Praxis. Journal of Ecopedagogy, 5(1), 153-168.
[16]	Lautensach, A., &Lautensach, S. (2010). A Curriculum for a Secure Future: Agenda for Reform. In G. Martin, D. Houston, P. McLaren, & J. Suoranta (Eds.), The Havoc of Capitalism: Publics, Pedagogies and
[17]	Environmental Crisis (pp. 207-228). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
[18]	Lemons, J. (1996). Afterword: University education in sustainable development and environmental protection. In J. B. Callicott& F. J. R. da Rocha (Eds.), Earth summit ethics: Toward a reconstructive postmodern philosophy of environmental education (pp. 193-217). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[19]	Millennium Assessment Board. (2005). Millennium Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing. Washington, DC: Island Press.
[20]	McMichael, A. J. (2001). Human frontiers, environments and disease: past patterns, uncertain futures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[21]	Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
[22]	Myers, N. (1993). Ultimate Security: The Environmental Basis of Political Stability. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
[23]	Myers, N., & Kent, J. (2004). The New Consumers: The Influence of Affluence on the Environment. London: Island Press.
[24]	Odum, W. (1982). Environmental degradation and the tyranny of small decisions. Bioscience, 32(9), 728-729.
[25]	Ponton, A. (2001). No title. The Pherologist, 4(3), 2.
[26]	Rees, W. (2004). Waking the Sleepwalkers – Globalisation and Sustainability: Conflict or Convergence. In W. Chesworth, M. R. Moss, & V. G. Thomas (Eds.), The Human Ecological Footprint (pp. 1-34). Guelph, Canada: University of Guelph.
[27]	Ronsin, F., Newman, S., & Dubois, F. (1999, 30 September-2 October). Ecomalthusians and Pherologists. Paper presented at Conference: Nature, Society and History: Long Term Dynamics of Social Metabolism, Vienna, Austria.
[28]	UN Millennium Project. (2005). investing in development: A practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. New York: United Nations.
[29]	United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human Development Report: New Dimensions of Human Security. New York & Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[30]	United Nations. (2000). we the Peoples: The role of the United Nations in the 21st century. New York: United Nations. Retrieved 29 October 2010, from http://www.un.org/millennium/sg/report/key.htm.
[31]	Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenko, J., &Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494-499.
[32]	World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future: The Brundtland Report. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[33]	Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Callejas Linares, A., LópezFalfán, I. S., Méndez García, J., Suárez Guerrero, A. I., & Guadalupe Suárez Guerrero, M. (1997). Ecological Footprints of Nations: How Much Nature Do They Use? - How Much Nature Do They Have?Xalapa, Mexico & San Jose, Costa Rica: Centre for Sustainability Studies & Earth Council. Retrieved 29 October 2010, from http://www.ecouncil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/footprint.
[34]	Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., Monfreda, C., Loh, J., Myers, N., Norgaards, R., & Randers, J. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9266-9271. Retrieved 29 October 2010, from http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/99/14/9266.pdf.
[35]	Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Oxford, UK: John Carpenter.
[36]	York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and Impact: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351-365.