Towards an Ameliorated Approach for Design and Maturity of Cloud Service Technical Activities and Cloud Project Management by Overcoming the Service Scope Creep

Manu A R^1, , Shivanand M Handigund², Manoj Kumar M³, Dinesha H A¹, V K Agrawal⁴, K N Balasubramanya Murthy¹ and Nandakumar A N⁵

¹Department of Information Science and Engineering, PES Institute of Techonology, VTU, Bangalore, India

²Department of Computer Science and Engineering, M Tech, Vemana Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India

³Jain University, Bangalore, India

⁴Department of Information Science and Engineering, PES University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

⁵Department of Information Science and Engineering, New Horizon college of Engineering, Bangalore, India

Cite this paper:
Manu A R, Shivanand M Handigund, Manoj Kumar M, Dinesha H A, V K Agrawal, K N Balasubramanya Murthy and Nandakumar A N. Towards an Ameliorated Approach for Design and Maturity of Cloud Service Technical Activities and Cloud Project Management by Overcoming the Service Scope Creep. Journal of Computer Networks. 2017; 4(1):30-47. doi: 10.12691/jcn-4-1-4

Abstract

In general the end service/product devised is offered as a service over cloud. The service is coded as a software service. Whereas the service that is coded as software project is time bounded endeavor relating the scope, risk, time schedule, cost investment, effort, in addition it involves human and computing resources. The service is devised as technical activities (TA’s) based on managerial activities as put forth by PMI. These managerial activities enhance the value of quality parameters with varying art. The au-courant velocity of the crowd computing service software design and development is derisorily low due to invertible use of cloud service managerial activities devised by PMI. The clairvoyant study reveals that the TA’s do not have proper predefined methodological existence to execute the service TA’s, it is under dogmatic effect. In the absence of multilateral experts for the service project management activities (PMA’s) devised by PMI, US is de-facto standard is used to upgrade the service quality core activities. Unfortunately the PMA’s to devise the core basic TA’s is under derision of foppishness. The multilateral collaborative stakeholders are ignorant, without proper vision, objective mission, it has become an ornamental show that there is a urgency and need to devise the core TA’s for developing of cloud service software. The TA’s are abstracted from by-products of the managerial activities. But this activities of cloud service development are devised by neglecting the core TA’s. There is no pari-passu between these two activities of devising the secured cloud services. Devising the TA’s and MA’s involves filling the tables devised by MA’s with the project service inputs without derision of foxiness. Since both TA’s and MA’s take same input and output base. The PMA is devised using 2-D space devised by 5 PLC’s, and 11 KA’s. The MA’s involves enhancing the TA’s quality parameters. Connecting to the computing system any service using any network, any place, anywhere, by any one at any time using any device by connecting to internetwork. Normally the secured end product of cloud computing system project service that develops the computing system software is a time bound endeavor involving scope, risk-schedule, human and system computing resources. Normally in cloud system SDLC, engineers and stakeholders adopt the secured technical activities based on the computing system managerial operational activities. These activities are designed by Software Engineering Institute (SEI), NIST and Project management institute (PMI). These are based on tables, metrics, standards, guidelines, rules is referred in secured computing systems managerial activities are used to identify the activities required for the ensuing secured software this is termed as computing system service technical activities. The secured computing managerial activities which enhance the ideals of these QOS factors are supported on shifting art by means of the computing system solid waste division of the crowd computing system; we explore the project scope management [6,7]. Using the computing system solid waste division of the crowd computing system, we explore the project scope management. Further we explicate scope creep versus progressive amplification, and discuss the common causes for scope creeping of the computing system product/project service scope creep management. Some steps to prevent the scope creep, using the case study and present the lessons learned from the case studies.

Keywords:
cloud service project scope creep cloud service project management cloud service management cloud service web crawlers cloud agility

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Project management body of knowledge, PMBOK 4th and 5th edition, published by Project management Institute, USA (Reviewed once in 4 years).
[2]	Software project management a real world guide to success Joel henry pearson education inc 2004.
[3]	Software project management a concise study by Kelkar S A PHI learning private limited New delhi 2nd edition 2011.
[4]	SM Handigund, BP Deepak, “Reverse engineering of legacy cobol systems”, Ph. D. thesis Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, 2001.
[5]	Software project management a unified framework by Walker Royce Pearson education inc.
[6]	Shivanad M. Handigund, D. B. Phatak in proceedings of “Reengineering Methodology for Legacy COBOL Systems” has been published in proceedings of International conference on Information Technology held during August 01-04, 2000 at Bangkok, Thailand.
[7]	Shivanand M. Handigund, Shakuntala Sajjanar, B. N. Arunakumari: “Resuscitation of syllogism within unified modeling language levels through the renovation of object diagram”. ICACCI 2015: 2397-2401.
[8]	“Resuscitation of syllogism within unified modeling language levels through the renovation of object diagram”. ICACCI 2015: 2397-2401.
[9]	Shivanand M. Handigund, Siddappa G. Makanur, M. Sreenivasa Rao., “Integration of Object Oriented Host Program with Network”, DBMS. SCSE 2015: 178-185
[10]	A. M. Shivaram, Shivanand M. Handigund. “An Ameliorated Methodology for the Abstraction of Object Oriented Features from Software Requirements Specification”. SCSE 2015: 274-281
[11]	Shivanand M. Handigund, B. N. Arunakumari: “An Ameliorated Methodology to Abstract Object Oriented Features from Programming System”. SCSE 2015: 470-477.
[12]	Shivanand M. Handigund, Shivaram A. M., B. N. Arunakumari., “An ameliorated methodology to establish the analogy between business process perspective views and UML diagrams. ICACCI 2014: 231-23”.
[13]	Shivanand M. Handigund, B. N. Arunakumari. “An ameliorated methodology for the identification of project activities of software development projects”. ICACCI 2013: 172-177
[14]	Shivanand M. Handigund, Bhat Shweta. “Automated Methodologies for the Design of Flow Diagrams for Development and Maintenance Activities”. CETS 2010: 93-104
[15]	Ajeet A. Chikkamannur, Shivanand M. Handigund. “An ameliorated methodology to design normalized relations”. AICCSA 2009: 861-864.
[16]	Shivanand M. Handigund, S R Nagalakshmi. “An ameliorated methodology for the design of panoptic work process flow diagram”, Conference: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT) May 2016.
[17]	Shivanand M. Handigund, S. B. Kshama, N. Ranjana. “An ameliorated methodology for design and development of a work process diagram to be incorporated in UML.” ICACCI 2013: 184-190.
[18]	Shivanand M. Handigund, Rajkumar N. Kulkarni. “An Ameliorated Methodology for the design of Object Structures from legacy ‘C’ Program”, 2010 by IJCA Journal.
[19]	Shivanand M. Handigund; Shivaram A. M. ; Arunakumari B. N. “An ameliorated methodology to establish the analogy between business process perspective views and UML diagrams”, (ICACCI, 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 24-27 Sept. 2014, IEEE.
[20]	S. M. Handigund and R. N. Kulkarani. “Abstraction of structural and behavioural components from legacy C program” in the proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies (ICACCT-2007) November 03-04, 2007 at Paniput, Haryana.
[21]	Shivanand M. Handigund; A. M. Shivaram. “An Ameliorated Methodology for the Abstraction of Usecases from software requirements specification”, IEEE, Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2013, 7-9 Oct. 2013.
[22]	Shivanand M. Handigund; H. B. Kavitha; A. Aphoorva, “An automated methodology for the design of usecase package diagram”, 2012 IEEE-World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, Year: 2012, Pages: 309-314.
[23]	Shivanand M. Handigund; Shweta Bhat. “An ameliorated methodology for the abstraction of object class structures for an information system”, 2010 International Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE 2010), December 5-7, 2010, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, IEEE, pp-362-367.
[24]	Shivanand M. Handigund; Nagalakshmi S. R.. “An Ameliorated Methodology for the Design of Panoptic Usecase Flow Diagram to Constellate UML's Usecase and Sequence/Communication Diagrams”, 2014,IEEE- Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications, Year: 2014, Pages: 153-156.
[25]	S. M. Handigund; C. Pushpa. “An ameliorated methodology for the design of Product Data Flow Diagram”, 2012 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT), 2012, IEEE, 30 Oct.-2 Nov. 2012.
[26]	S. M. Handigund and R. N. Kulkarani, “an Ameliorated Methodology for the Abstraction and Minimization of Functional Dependencies of legacy ‘C’ Program Elements”, International Journal o f Computer Applications.
[27]	Ajeet A. Chikkamannur, Shivanand M. Handigund, “A Mediocre Approach to Syndicate the Attributes for a Class or Relation”, International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, Vol. 5 No. 4, October, 2011
[28]	Shivanand M Handigund, Syed Naimatullah Hussain, “Design of an Ameliorated Methodology for the Abstraction of Usable Components of Object Oriented Paradigm from the Software Requirement Specification (SRS)”, International J. of Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 2, May 2010.
[29]	Shivanand M. Handigund, “A Suigeneris Automated Software Testing Methodology”, Procedia Computer Science.
[30]	Volume 62, 2015, Pages 21-22, Elsevier 2015 International Conference on Soft Computing and Software Engineering (SCSE 2015).
[31]	Shivanand M Handigund, Shakuntala Sajjanar, “An Ameliorated Methodology for the Determination of Shortest Path in Single Source Multi Destination Graph”, Conference Paper · January 2015, Conference: Department of Information Science and Technology.
[32]	Shivanand M Handigund, Priya srinivasa, “An Ameliorated Methodology for the Design and Development of Software Project Activities,” Conference paper, Jan 2015.
[33]	S. M. Handigund tutorial on “Unravelling The Hidden Treasures Of Research Avenues In Object-Oriented Technology” Worldcomp'11 at Las Vegas, Nevada, USA on July 18-21, 2011.
[34]	S. M. Handigund, Shivaram A M and Apoorva “An Ameliorated Methodology for the Abstraction of Use Cases from SRS”, international journal on Global Perspective on Engineering Management (GPEM) published by the World Academic Publishing Co., Limited, Hong Kong.
[35]	SM Handigund. “An Ameliorated Methodology for the Abstraction of Use cases from Software Requirements Specification” has been published in IEEE technically sponsored international conference Science and Technology (SAI-2013), London, UK to be held on October 7-9.
[36]	Shivanand M. Handigund, Kshama S. B., Ranjana N. “An Ameliorated Methodology for Design and Development of a Work Process Diagram to be incorporated in UML”, 2013. International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communicationsand Informatics (ICACCI). Pp-184-190, 22-25 Aug. 2013.
[37]	Pankaj Jalote, An Integrated Approach to Software Engineering, 3 Edition, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 2008.
[38]	Shivanand M. Handigund, Reverse Engineering of Legacy COBOL systems, Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, 2001.
[39]	Software Engineering: Ian Sommerville, 8th Edition, Pearson Education, 2007.
[40]	John Atkins and Jon Beck. A survey on program slicing for software engineering. In Technical Report, Dept. Statistics and Comp. Science, West Virginia University, West Virginia, April 1993.
[41]	Lioyd D. Fosdic Leon J. Osterweil. Data flow analysis in software reliability. SIGPLAN Notices, 8(3), Sept.1976.
[42]	Jaco de Bakker and Erik de Vink. Control flow semantics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996.
[43]	Michael Wolfe. High Performance Compilers for parallel Computing. Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, Redwood City, 1995.
[44]	Werner Kluge. The organization o reduction, data flow and Control flow. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992.
[45]	Lawrence Markosian et. Al. Using an enabling technology to reengineer legacy systems. Communication of the ACM, 37(5), May 1994.
[46]	Frank Tip. Generation of Program Analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Amsterdam University, 1995.
[47]	Mark Weiser. Program slicing, in IEEE International Conference on Software maintenance, 1981.
[48]	Mark Weiser. Program slicing. IEEE transaction on Software Engineering, 1984.
[49]	Larry J. Morell, Lionel E. Deimel, “Unit Analysis and Testing”, SEI Curriculum Module SEI-CM-9-2.0 June 1992.
[50]	Agostino Cortesi Gilberto Fil´e (Eds.) Edited by G. Goos, J. Hartmanis and J. van Leeuwen, “Static Analysis”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1694, 6th International Symposium, SAS’99 Venice, Italy, September 22-24, 1999 Proceedings (Lecture notes in computer science ; Vol. 1694).
[51]	Software project management by Pankaj Jalote, Peason Pubication, 2011.
[52]	Software Project Management by Bob Hughes and Mike Cotterel, Tata McGrawhill, 5th edition, 2011.
[53]	Frank Tip, Generation of Program analysis PhD thesis Amstredam University1995.