Journal of Computer Networks
ISSN (Print): 2372-4749 ISSN (Online): 2372-4757 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jcn Editor-in-chief: Sergii Kavun, Naima kaabouch
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Computer Networks. 2025, 13(1), 1-15
DOI: 10.12691/jcn-13-1-1
Open AccessArticle

AI-Driven Adaptive Modulation for Enhancing Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)

Iven Aabaah1, , Valentine Aveyom2, Solomon Anab3 and Seth Gyamerah2

1Department of Information Systems and Technology, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Ghana

2Department of Computer Science, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Ghana

3Department of Computer Science, Koforidua Technical University, Koforidua, Ghana

Pub. Date: June 03, 2026

Cite this paper:
Iven Aabaah, Valentine Aveyom, Solomon Anab and Seth Gyamerah. AI-Driven Adaptive Modulation for Enhancing Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Journal of Computer Networks. 2025; 13(1):1-15. doi: 10.12691/jcn-13-1-1

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are a major development in communication and distributed sensing systems. A wireless sensor network (WSN) consists of numerous tiny, inexpensive, low-power devices called sensor nodes that monitor environmental or physical parameters, including temperature, pressure, humidity, motion, and pollution. Together, these sensor nodes gather, process, and wirelessly transmit data to a central location, often called a base station or sink node, for further analysis. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are increasingly used in dynamic, resource-constrained settings, where it remains very difficult to use energy and communication resources effectively. This paper presents an AI-driven adaptive modulation system that improves network performance, reliability, and energy efficiency. The proposed approach combines residual energy monitoring, channel-aware adaptation, and reinforcement learning-based decision-making to dynamically select the optimal modulation schemes under changing channel conditions. Modulation levels can be intelligently and independently selected based on node energy status, link quality, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by defining the adaptive modulation problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). A thorough mathematical model that accounts for bit-error rate (BER) limitations, energy consumption, and wireless channel characteristics is developed to ensure reliable and efficient communication. The framework achieves the best possible balance between energy efficiency and transmission efficiency by optimizing energy use and normalizing throughput. Compared to the conventional static modulation procedure, the proposed method performs significantly better. Comprehensive simulations using MATLAB and NS-3 reveal notable increases in network longevity along with gains of up to 20–35% in energy efficiency, 15–25% in packet delivery ratio, 20–30% in latency reduction, and 25–35% in throughput. These findings show that AI-driven adaptive modulation provides a scalable and dependable solution for next-generation WSNs, enabling intelligent resource management and sustainable network operation in dynamic communication scenarios.

Keywords:
wireless sensor networks energy-efficiency artificial intelligence adaptive modulation

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., and Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: A survey on Enabling Technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE com- munications surveys & Tutorials, 17(4): 2347-2376.
 
[2]  A. Boukerche, L. Xu, and K. El-Khatib, “Trust-based security for wireless ad hoc and sensor networks,” Computer Communications, vol. 30, no. 11–12, pp. 2413–2427, Sep. 2020.
 
[3]  Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, and L. Wang, “A survey of trust management for mobile ad hoc networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 150458–150478, 2020.
 
[4]  Sun, Y., Peng, M., and Mao, S. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning-based mode selection and resource management for green fog radio access networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2): 1960-1971.
 
[5]  Chen, M., Challita, U., Saad, W., Yin, C., and Debbah, M. (2017). Machine learning for wireless networks with artificial ntelligence: A tutorial on neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1710.02913, 9.
 
[6]  R. Joshi and S. De, “Lightweight trust mechanism for WSNs based on behavioral monitoring,” Wireless Networks, vol. 27, pp. 1543–1559, 2021.
 
[7]  H. Li, K. Zhang, and Y. Xiang, “A survey on trust management for WSNs and IoT,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1–36, 2021.
 
[8]  Xiao, L., Wan, X., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., and Wu, D. (2018). IoT security techniques based on machine learning: How do IoT devices use ai to enhance security? IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(5): 41-49.
 
[9]  Zhang, S., Zhang, H., He, Q., Bian, K., and Song, L. (2017). Joint trajectory and power optimization for UAV relay networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 22(1): 161-164.
 
[10]  A. Rehman and Z. Khan, “TrustSense: A lightweight trust evaluation model for WSNs,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 170, p. 102766, Jan. 2020.
 
[11]  B. Ghosh and S. Sarkar, “Distributed dynamic clustering and secure data aggregation in WSNs,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 113, p. 102395, Feb. 2021.
 
[12]  Ye, H., Li, G. Y., and Juang, B.-H. (2017). Power of deep learning for channel estimation and signal detection in OFDM systems. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 7(1): 114-117.
 
[13]  Mao, C., Mu, Z., Liang, Q., Schizas, I., and Pan, C. (2023). Deep learning in physical layer communications: Evolution and prospects in 5g and 6g networks. IET Communications, 17(16): 1863-1876.
 
[14]  M. S. Hossain, G. Muhammad, and S. M. Rahman, “Multi-metric trust computation in hierarchical WSNs,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 108, pp. 147–160, Jul. 2020.
 
[15]  T. Nguyen and C. Kim, “LTS: Lightweight Trust Sensing model for wireless networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 44294–44304, 2021.
 
[16]  Davaslioglu, K. and Ayanoglu, E. (2014). Quantifying potential energy efficiency gain in green cellular wireless networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(4): 2065-2091.
 
[17]  Huang, L., Zhang, Q., Tan, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., He,m C., and Tian, Z. (2020). Adaptive modulation and coding in underwater acoustic communications: a machine learning perspective. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2020(1): 203.
 
[18]  A. Abduvaliyev et al., “ETRES: Entropy and trust-based secure routing protocol for wireless sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 465, 2021.
 
[19]  J. Zhou and X. Wang, “TEAHR: Trust Enhanced AODV-based Hierarchical Routing for MANETs,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 115, pp. 1207–1230, 2020.
 
[20]  Milovanˇcevi´c, M. (2025). AI-driven signal processing and network management for next-generation communications. Journal of AI-Driven Communication Engineering, 1: 59-71.
 
[21]  Avaid, S., Saeed, N., Qadir, Z., Fahim, H., He, B., Song, H., and Bilal, M. (2023). Communication and control in collaborative UAVs: Recent advances and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(6): 5719-5739.
 
[22]  P. Sharma et al., “Trust-aware and context-aware IoT framework for smart healthcare,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 10088–10100, 2021.
 
[23]  D. Chen and L. Zhang, “A fuzzy inference model for mobility-aware trust clustering in MANETs,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 158, p. 113517, 2020.
 
[24]  Su, W., Lin, J., Chen, K., Xiao, L., and En, C. (2019). Reinforcement learning-based adaptive modulation and coding for efficient underwater communications. IEEE Access, 7: 67539-67550.
 
[25]  Goyal, U., Upadhyay, S., Venugopal, V., Sahoo, P. K., GN, M., Pandey, S., and Bansal, S. (2025). Ai-powered adaptive modulation for enhanced spectral efficiency in 6g networks- antenna. National Journal of Antennas and Propagation,m 7(1): 1-7.
 
[26]  L. Wang and M. Chen, “KHOPCA-based secure clustering in mobile WSNs,” Computers & Security, vol. 98, p. 102018, 2020.
 
[27]  A. Singh and S. Basu, “Freshness-based adaptive trust model for WSNs,” Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 72, p. 103439, 2020.
 
[28]  Sattibabu, G., Gudivada, A. A., Ravula, R., Kumar, R. A., and Kalyani, K. (2026). Machine learning-driven adaptive routing for efficient and reliable wireless sensor networks. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B, pages 1-12.
 
[29]  Sadek, A. H., Rattal, S., Boukricha, S., Varshney, G., Ar- Reyouchi, E. M., and Ghoumid, K. (2025). Smart energy solutions for wireless medical sensor networks: Modulation optimization in IoT for medical applications. International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control, 15(3): 289-303.
 
[30]  M. A. Rahman and M. S. Hossain, “Trust propagation protocol for secure sensor collaboration,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 15, p. 5100, 2021.
 
[31]  H. Zhang, R. Zhao, and L. Liu, “Reducing trust propagation delay in mobile sensor environments,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 380–389, Mar. 2021.
 
[32]  Khedhri, N. and Najar, M. (2025). Adaptive modulation selection in wireless communications: A comparative study of reinforcement learning, deep learning, deep reinforcement learning, and traditional policies. In 2025 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), pages 1622-1625. IEEE.
 
[33]  Jha, A., Maurya, A., Pandey, A., et al. (2025). Minimization of energy expenditure in wireless sensor networks using crayfish optimization algorithm. In 2025 Second International Conference on Networks and Soft Computing (IC- NSoC), pages 132-137. IEEE.
 
[34]  S. Raza and M. B. Tahir, “Cluster-based routing with trust and energy factors in dynamic WSNs,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 961–975, 2021.
 
[35]  J. Singh, R. Verma, and K. R. Chowdhury, “Reputation-based trust in edge-enabled IoT,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 4643–4655, Dec. 2021.
 
[36]  Rahman, W. U., Gang, Q., Zhou, F., Tahir, M., Ali, W., Adil, M., and Khattak, M. I. (2025). Deep q-learning based adap- tive mac protocol with collision avoidance and efficient power control for UWSNs. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(3): 616.
 
[37]  Rahman, W. U., Gang, Q., Zhou, F., Tahir, M., Ali, W., Adil, M., Zong Xin, S., and Khattak, M. I. (2025). Energy-efficient mac protocol for underwater sensor networks using CSMA/CA, TDMA, and actor–critic reinforcement learning (AC-RL) fusion. In Acoustics, volume 7, page 39.
 
[38]  Rodriguez, J. R. and Ammari, H. M. (2025). Precision hole detection and energy-aware QoS scheduling for wireless sensor networks. In 2025, 14th IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Performance Evaluation and Modeling in Wired and Wireless Networks (PEMWN), pages 1-7. IEEE.
 
[39]  Qamar, M. S., ul Haq, I., Munir, M. F., Roslee, M. B., Awan, A. A., and Waseem, A. (2024). Enhancing energy efficiency in WSNs with hybrid LEACH-D and ANN. In 2024 Multimedia University Engineering Conference (MECON), pages 1-6. IEEE.
 
[40]  Abdoulaye, I., Belleudy, C., Rodriguez, L., and Miramond, B. (2024). Semi-decentralized prediction method for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Letters, 8(4): 1-4
 
[41]  Roopashree, H. et al. (2024). Robust wireless sensor network using enhanced trust-based secure and energy-efficient rout- ing algorithm (ETBSEER) to prevent malicious nodes. In 2024 Second International Conference on Advances in Information Technology (ICAIT), volume 1, pages 1–6. IEEE.