Effect of Frequent Testing On Female Students Performance in Some Selected Physics Concepts at the Senior High School in Ghana

Daniel Nti^1, , Jacob Nene Nanor¹, Obed Baa-Yanney¹, Saviour Victor Kwabla Adjibolosoo¹ and Isaac Prosper Agbeko¹

¹Department of Science, Presbyterian Women’s College of Education, Ghana

Cite this paper:
Daniel Nti, Jacob Nene Nanor, Obed Baa-Yanney, Saviour Victor Kwabla Adjibolosoo and Isaac Prosper Agbeko. Effect of Frequent Testing On Female Students Performance in Some Selected Physics Concepts at the Senior High School in Ghana. International Journal of Physics. 2020; 8(1):21-28. doi: 10.12691/ijp-8-1-4

Abstract

Educational assessment is considered as one of the most important aspects of higher education and most educational institutions rely on tests to determine students’ performance, achievements and certification. However, extensive literature reviewed indicates that no study has been conducted to determine the effects of frequent testing on female students’ performance in Physics. This study investigated the effect of frequent testing on the performance of female students in some selected Physics concepts. The study used quantitative research approach and action research design. Fifty (50) second year female science students formed the study participants. Data was collected using tests. The experimental data collected were analysed using descriptive statistics and one-sample t-test. The mean score for each student for the six week-period was determined. The overall mean score for the entire students was determined to give an idea of students’ general performance in the frequent tests after both reading assignments and teaching of concepts. The results of the study showed that the mean scores obtained by students after teaching concepts (μ=6.35) was better than mean scores of students after reading assignment (μ=2.74). In addition, the results clearly showed a statistically significant difference in the performance of students after the teaching concepts (p<0.05). These results further suggest that frequent testing after teaching constitutes an effective way of improving the performance of female students in Physics. The study recommends that science teachers in general, and Physics teachers in particular, should employ frequent testing in their teaching and learning process as testing makes students learn ahead which in effect affect their performance in Physics positively.

Keywords:
frequent testing female students’ performance physics concepts senior high schools Ghana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Meyer, L. H., Davidson, S., McKenzie, L., Rees, M., Anderson, H., Fletcher, R., & Johnston, M. P. (2010). An investigation of tertiary assessment policy and practice: Alignment and contradictions. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 331-335.
[2]	Bangert-Drowns, L. R., Kulik, A. J., & Kulik, C. C. (2013). Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 10-25.
[3]	Phelps, P. R. (2012). The effect of testing on student achievement, 1910-2010. International Journal of Testing, 22(1), 21-43.
[4]	Zarei, A. A. (2010). Course performance: the effect of quiz frequency on course performance and its relationship with class attendance of Iranian university learners of English. Journal of Persian Language and literature, 26, 52-69.
[5]	Gholami, V., & Morady, M. M. (2013). The effect of weekly quizzes on students' final achievement score. Modern Education and Computer Science, 1, 36-41.
[6]	Momeni, A., & Barimani, S. h. (2012). The effects of testing frequency on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners' language achievement. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 2(10), 76-87.
[7]	Sterlling, S. (2015). The difference between assessment and testing. Retrieved March 10, 2017, from http://blog.learningsciences.com/2015/01/13/the-difference-between-assessment-and-testing/.
[8]	Siedlecki, J. (2012). Education testing: Assessment of learning versus assessment for learning. Retrieved January 24, 2016, from https://www.msdf.org/blog/2012/05/education-testing-assessment-of-learning-versus-assessment-for-learning/.
[9]	Overton, T. (2012). Testing, assessment and evaluation definition. Retrieved January 5, 2017, from http://www.slideshare.net/norazmi3003/testing-assessment-measurement-and-evaluation-definition.
[10]	National teachers institute. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2017, from http://www.nti-nigeria.org/nti-pgde/PGDE6.pdf.
[11]	Oslon, L. (2005). Benchmark assessment offers regular achievement. Education week. Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/11/30/13benchmark.h25.html.
[12]	Lahey, J. (2014). Students' should be tested more, not less. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from http://www.theatlantic.com.
[13]	National Council of Teachers of English. (2014). How standardized tests shape and limit students learning. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/CC/0242-nov2014/CC0242PolicyStandardized.pdf.
[14]	Adkins, J. K., & Linville, D. R. (2017). Testing frequently an introductory computer programming course. Information Systems Education Journal, 15(3), 22-26.
[15]	Kleeman, J. (2012). Ten benefits of quizzes and tests in educational practice. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from https://blog.questionmark.com/ten-benefits-of-quizzes-and-tests-in-educational-practic.
[16]	Goodblar, D. (2014). Retrieved January 5, 2017, from http://www.chroniclevitae.com.
[17]	Smith, M., & Weinstein, Y. (2016). The many benefits of retrieval practice. Retrieved May 9, 2017, from http://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2016/5/5-1.
[18]	Vaessen, B. E., Beemt, A., watering, G., Meeuwen, L. W., Leemens, L., & Brok, P. (2016). Students' perception of frequent assessment and its relation to motivation and grades in a statistics course: A pilot study. Retrieved May 20, 2017, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2016.1204532.
[19]	Alade, M. O., & Kuku, O. O. (2017). Impact of frequency of testing on Study habits and achievement in mathematics among secondary school Students in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7(1), 1-18.
[20]	Vinz, S. (2015). The theoretical framework of a thesis: What and how. Retrieved February 11, 2017, from https://www.scribbr.com/thesis/the-theoretical-framework-of-a-thesis-what-and-how/.
[21]	Hoque, R. (2013). Effects of reinforcement on teaching-learning. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 13-16.
[22]	McLeod, S. A. (2015). Skinner operant conditioning. Retrieved February 7, 2017, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.htm.
[23]	Vlach, A. H., Catherine, M. S., & Nate, K. (2012). Spacing effect in children's memory and category induction. Franz Hall, Los Angeles, CA90095: University of Califonia.
[24]	Carpenter, S. K. (2014). Spacing and interleaving of study and practice. Retrieved January 10, 2017, from https://public.psych.iastate.edu/sharp/carpenter_2014_science_of_learning.pdf.
[25]	Sharma, A. (2016). Essay on forgetting: Causes and theories. Retrieved April 23, 2017, from http://www.psychologydiscussion.net/essays/essay-on-forgetting-causes-and-theories/600.
[26]	Kim, A. J. (2012). Explainer: What is forgetting. Retrieved February 5, 2017, from http://theconversation.com/explainer_what_is_forgetting_9109.
[27]	Blakstad, O. (2008). Research design. Retrieved July 19, 2017, from Explorable.com:https://explorable.comresearch-designs.
[28]	George D, Mallery P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 update. 4. Allyn & Bacon; Boston: 2003. p. 231.
[29]	Awanta, E. K., & Aseidu-Addo, S. K. (2008). Essential Statistical Technique in Research: For University in Education. Accra: Salt 'N' Light Publication.
[30]	Leeming, F. C. (2002). The exam-a day procedure improves performance in psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 29(3), 210-212.
[31]	Cronbach, L. J., & Richard, J. S. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor Procedures. The Regents of the University of California.
[32]	Pallant, J. (2011). A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program: Survival Manual, (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill, Berkshire.
[33]	Vaessen, B. E., Beemt, A., watering, G., Meeuwen, L. W., Leemens, L., & Brok, P. (2016). Students' perception of frequent assessment and its relaton to mlotivation and grdes in a statistics course: A pilot study. Accessed on Novermber 20, 2019.
[34]	Stenger, M. (2014). Frequent testing improves academic preparation and performance. Retrieved August 31, 2017, from http://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/other/frequent-testing-improves-academic-performance/.
[35]	Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (2010). Effective grading (2nd ed.). San Francisco: CA: Jossey Bass.