Novel Descriptions of the Big Bang, Inflation, Galactic Structure and Energetic Quasars

Jay D. Rynbrandt^1,

¹Chevron Research, Richmond, CA, USA

Cite this paper:
Jay D. Rynbrandt. Novel Descriptions of the Big Bang, Inflation, Galactic Structure and Energetic Quasars. Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology. 2016; 2(1):24-34. doi: 10.12691/faac-2-1-4

Abstract

Black holes (BH) hold immense energy. In most cases, when BH collide, they release a sufficient pulse of energy that they do not combine. These collisions are supra elastic so that BH leave them with extra kinetic energy. With mutual BH rejection, new mechanisms emerge for the big bang (BB), inflation, galaxy formation and quasars. Mutual BH rejection also held separate, highly energetic, ultra-massive, (galaxy-acquired) black holes (UMBH), of a dying universe, as they accelerated their collapse into a universal black hole. However, an instant before complete collapse, UMBH reached a critical temperature/pressure and detonated the big bang (BB) to consume all UMBH. The BB released energy, mass and space constrained by billions of UMBH. The relativistic mass, that had been created with as galactic components fell into their UMBH, enlarged this succeeding universe. The freed space produced inflation, and the matter mass steered the new universe toward continued matter domination. But a few hundred billion, much smaller (and previously far more numerous) stellar BH (stBH) survived both the collapse and BB, aligned themselves at the intersections of inflation bubbles, grew to super-massive size (due to BB pressure) and then began building galaxies as continuing inflation converted accretion disk trajectories into galactic orbits, which were stabilized by rotating space. These galaxies retained filament associations, which their central BH had established earlier. In rare cases, super massive BH (SMBH) also survived the BB, grew into astoundingly massive black holes (~10⁺¹³ solar mass, AMBH) and then organized clusters of galaxies, like the Coma cluster, to orbit about themselves. Also rarely, the extreme differential energy/mass accretion pressures following the BB held some colliding BH together while they paired as intimately-coupled, binary SMBH. We see them today as ancient, energetic quasars spewing immense plasma radiation, or as younger, radio frequency, active galactic nuclei (AGN) -- depending their SMBH-orbital separation. Plasma quasars orbit each other within their reactive (surface disruptive) distance, and radio AGN exceed this distance. BH precursors needed to be present at the time of the BB to be pressure-joined as close-coupled, equal-mass, SMBH pairs, and the high efficiency of their plasma-based, light-generating mechanism suggests that current quasar size estimates may be high. Plasma quasars expire when their SMBH separation distance exceeds their surface-disruptive distance; and they leave behind energetic, radio frequency AGN. As this paired AGN whips their intense, intertwined magnetic fields through the narrow gap between them, their compressed fields tear electrons from their atomic nuclei and eject both as relativistic, radio frequency electrons and as extreme energy cosmic rays, respectively.

Keywords:
black hole big bang inflation galaxy formation galactic clusters dwarf galaxies gravity waves

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Reines, A. E. et al. An actively accreting massive black hole in a dwarf starburst galaxy Henise 2-10. Nature 470, 66-68 (2011).
[2]	Reines, A. E. et al. Gaint black hole in a stripped galaxy. Nature 513, 322-323 (2014).
[3]	Seth, A. C. et al. A supermassive black hole in an ultra-compact dwarf galaxy, Nature 513, 98-400 (2014).
[4]	Robert Quimby of Caltech, Nature online, June 8, 2011 – as referenced by, Ron Cowen, Science News, July 2 2011, vol180 no1, p10.
[5]	Physical Review Letters, February 11, 2016, as cited by, Andrew Grant, Science News, March 5, 2016, vol 189 no 5.
[6]	Volker Springel, Nature, June 2, 2005 – as referenced by, Ron Cowen, Science News, August 13, 2005, vol168, p104.
[7]	Cited in Ron Cowen, Science News, Jan. 22, 2005, v 167, p 56.
[8]	Tully, R. Brent, and J. R. Fischer, Atlas of Nearby Galaxies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987). As cited by E. J. Lerner, The Big Bang Never Happened (New York: Vintage Books, 1992).
[9]	Illustration cited by Ron Cowen, Science News, July 4, 2009, p5, attributed to Tim Jones, University of Texas at Austin, and K. Cordes and S. Brown/STSCI.
[10]	European Space Agency & Planck Collaboration / Rosat / Digitised Sky Survey.
[11]	Ron Cowen, Science News, Jan. 22, 2005, quoting Brian McNamara, Nature, Jan. 6 2005).
[12]	Daniel Mortlock of Imperial College London, Nature, June 30, 2011 – as cited by Nadia Drake, Science News, July 30, 2011, vol 180 no 3, p12.
[13]	Professor Adrian Lee of UC Berkeley ascribed the requirement for strong, intertwined magnetic fields to Professor Jon Arons UC Berkeley.
[14]	Roopesh Ojha et.al., Astronomy and Astrophysics, June 2011, – as referenced by, Ron Cowen, Science News, July 2, 2011, vol 180 no 1, p10.