Preparedness of Filipino Math Teachers for Generation Alpha: Development and Validation of a Readiness Scale

Peter John M. Melchor^1, and Jennifer O. Parcutilo¹

¹University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Peter John M. Melchor and Jennifer O. Parcutilo. Preparedness of Filipino Math Teachers for Generation Alpha: Development and Validation of a Readiness Scale. American Journal of Educational Research. 2025; 13(4):148-155. doi: 10.12691/education-13-4-1

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a readiness scale designed to assess the preparedness of Filipino mathematics teachers to teach Generation Alpha students, employing a mixed-method exploratory sequential design. The qualitative phase utilized a descriptive phenomenological approach to explore Generation Alpha students' perceptions of effective mathematics instruction. This exploration revealed three key themes: Positive and Supportive Teacher-Student Relationship, Student-Centered Learning through Games and Innovative Integration of Modern Technology, and Supportive and Non-Competitive Blended Learning Environment. Students emphasized the importance of teachers being empathetic, approachable, and engaging while integrating advanced technologies and fostering a supportive, non-competitive classroom. A 46-item readiness scale was developed based on these qualitative findings. The scale underwent expert review, pre-testing, and validation through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA, conducted on 250 responses, confirmed sample adequacy (KMO = 0.900, Bartlett’s test: p < 0.05) and identified a two-factor structure explaining 52.0% of the variance. The scale was refined to 31 items, with Factor 1, "Compassionate Learning Environment" (22 items), and Factor 2, "Engaging and Advanced Technology-Driven Teaching" (9 items). CFA, conducted on an independent sample (N = 202), validated the structure, yielding strong fit indices (SRMR = 0.055, CFI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.018, χ²(461) = 433, p = 0.173). The validated scale provides a reliable tool for assessing Filipino mathematics teachers’ readiness for Generation Alpha students, highlighting the need for compassionate, engaging, and advanced technology-driven teaching approaches.

Keywords:
Confirmatory factor analysis exploratory factor analysis Filipino mathematics teachers Generation Alpha readiness scale

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Amrit, K. J. (2020). Understanding Generation Alpha. OSF. https://osf.io/d2e8g/download.
[2]	McCrindle, M., & Fell. A. (2020). Understanding Generation Alpha. McCrindle Research.
[3]	Ngiwas, F. D. C. A., Mariano, D. L. F., Barsana, J. G., Cruz, M. P., & Elipane, L. (2022). Example–conclusion map in teaching simple interest: A lesson study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 377-384.
[4]	Tan, C. (2023). Generation Alpha — how much worse will this get? Medium.
[5]	Lee, H. R. (2020). New report on Generation Alpha – Characteristics of the youngest generation.
[6]	Kato, J. (2024). What Educators Need to Know about Generation Alpha. EdSurge.
[7]	Romero, A. (2017). Colleges need to prepare for Generation Alpha. CUNY Bernard M Baruch College Publications and Research.
[8]	Hill, H. C., & Chin, M. J. (2018). Connections Between Teachers’ Knowledge of Students, Instruction, and Achievement Outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 1076 - 1112.
[9]	Al-Sa'di, A., & Ahmad, E. (2023). The future of New Zealand tertiary education: Embracing online courses and AI tools. https://nzqri.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Future-of-Tertiary-Education-Embracing-Online-Courses-and-AI-Tools.pdf.
[10]	Arora, A., Jha, A. K., Alat, P., & Das, S. S. (2020). Understanding coronaphobia. Asian journal of psychiatry, 54, 102384.
[11]	Tootell, H., Freeman, M., & Freeman, A. (2014). Generation alpha at the intersection of technology, play and motivation. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 82-90). IEEE.
[12]	Apaydin, C., Kaya, F. (2020). An analysis of the preschool teachers’ views on alpha generation. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(11): 124-141.
[13]	Schawbel, D. (2014). Gen Z employees: The 5 attributes you need to know. Entrepreneur.
[14]	Fadlurrohim, I., Asmar Husein, L. Y., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2019). Understanding the development of Alpha Generation children in the industrial era 4.0. Focus: Journal of Social Work, 2, 178-186.
[15]	Jha, A. K. (2020, June 20). Understanding Generation Alpha.
[16]	Bonchiș, E. (2021). De la tradiționaliști la Generația Z [From traditionalists to Generation Z]. In E. Bonchiș (Ed.), Generația Z (pp. 17-82). Polirom.
[17]	Selvi, V., Bhuvaneswari, M., & Sandra, S. (2022). Stories: A tool to rejuvenate the culture of Generation Z and Generation Alpha. YMER Digital, 21(1), 267-276.
[18]	Barkowitz, D. (2016). 13 Things to know about the Alpha Generation: The newest generation has no purchasing power yet, but will soon take over the world. AdAge.
[19]	Glenn, M. (2008). The future of higher education: How technology will shape learning. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182088/.
[20]	Raja, R., Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(S1). 31-35.
[21]	McCrindle, M., Fell, A., & Buckerfield, S. (2021). Generation Alpha: Understanding our children and helping them thrive. Headline.
[22]	Cirilli, E., Nicoini, P., & Mandolini, L. (2019). Digital skills from silent to alpha generation: An overview. Proceedings of EDULEARN19 Conference, Palma, Mallorca, Spain.
[23]	Gatollari, M. (2023). The students are unteachable. Teachers warn that horrible parenting has rendered Gen Alpha hopeless. Distractify.
[24]	Oxford High School. (2024). Alpha generation learning cause for concern.
[25]	Mohamed, M. Z. B., Hidayat, R., Suhaizi, N. N. B., Sabri, N. B. M., Mahmud, M. K. H. B., & Baharuddin, S. N. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0694.
[26]	Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001.
[27]	Qiu, Y., Pan, J., & Ishak, N. A. (2022). Effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in improving pupils' deep learning in primary school mathematics teaching in Fujian Province. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 1362996.
[28]	Helbing, D. (2019). Societal, economic, ethical and legal challenges of the digital revolution: From big data to deep learning, artificial intelligence, and manipulative technologies. In Helbing D. (Ed.), Towards digital enlightenment (pp. 47–72). Springer.
[29]	Kerry, C. (2020). Protecting privacy in an AI-driven world. Brookings.
[30]	Fabito, B., Trillanes, A., & Sarmiento, J. (2021). Barriers and challenges of computing students in an online learning environment: Insights from one private university in the Philippines. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5, 441-458.
[31]	Roxas-Chua, G. (2019). Only 30% of Filipinos have basic digital skills - Google, Temasek study. BusinessWorld.
[32]	Estrellado, C. J. P., & Miranda, J. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the Philippine educational context: Circumspection and future inquiries. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(5), 16. ISSN 2250-3153.
[33]	Philippine Information Agency (PIA). (2021, July 25). UNP adopts smart campus concept; Receives P25M CHED grant.
[34]	Pigache, H. (2021). "Uncomfortable" Lessons for Generation Alpha. LinkedIn.
[35]	Harvard Catalyst (2023). Mixed methods research/basic mixed methods research design.
[36]	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
[37]	Price, L. R. (2017). Psychometric Methods: Theory into Practice. The Guilford Press.
[38]	Boateng, G. O., Collins, S. M., Mbullo, P., Wekesa, P., Onono, M., Neilands, T., & Young, S.L. (2018). A novel household water insecurity scale: Procedures and psychometric analysis among postpartum women in western Kenya. PLOS ONE.
[39]	Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806-838.
[40]	Suhr, D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? Proceedings of the 31st Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. (Paper Number: 200-31). SAS Institute Inc.
[41]	Walker, R. (2008). Twelve characteristics of an effective teacher: A longitudinal, qualitative, quasi-research study of in-service and pre-service teachers' opinions. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 61-68.
[42]	Mehrabian, F., Haji, A., Goudarzi, F., & Haghdoost, H. (2014). Characteristics of the capable teacher from the viewpoint of the students at Faculty of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2013. Educational Research Medical Sciences, 2(3), 26-29.
[43]	Pânişoară, I. O., Duţă, N., Pânişoară, G., & Tomoaica, E. (2014). Teacher profile in Romania: Defining features and priorities of the training programs in teaching career. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 396-400.
[44]	King, H. (2017). Teacher affective attitudes inventory: Development and validation of a Teacher self-assessment instrument. [Doctoral Dissertation, Antioch University].
[45]	Moore, K. D. (2007). Classroom Teaching Skills (5th ed.). Eastern New Mexico University Press, Inc.
[46]	National University. (n.d.). Constructivism in Education: What Is Constructivism?
[47]	Deyo, Z. M., Huynh, D., Rochester, C., Sturpe, D. A., & Kiser, K. (2011). Readiness for self-directed learning and academic performance in an ability laboratory course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(2), 1-6.
[48]	Prakash, J. (2012). Brief notes on the Thorndike’s laws of learning. Preserve Articles.
[49]	Ivory, A. (2022). Why is differentiated instruction important in the classroom? HMH Education Company.
[50]	Winter, D. (2023). Gen Alpha: Everything brands need to know in 2023. Shopify.
[51]	Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002.
[52]	Arranz, A. (2023). Math in the real world: everyday applications and example problems for your class. SOWISO.
[53]	Goulet-Lyle, M. P., Voyer, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2020). How does imposing a step-by-step solution method impact students’ approach to mathematical word problem-solving? ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(1), 139–149.
[54]	Kim, J., & Castelli, D. (2021). Effects of gamification on behavioral change in education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3550.
[55]	Klock, A. C. T., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M. S., & Hamari, J. (2020). Tailored gamification: A review of literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 144, 102495.
[56]	Holley, L., & Steiner, S. (2005). Safe space: Student perspectives on classroom environment. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 49-64.
[57]	Knowles, C., & Parsons, C. (2009). Evaluating a formalised peer mentoring programme: Student voice and impact audit. Pastoral Care in Education, 27(3), 205–218.
[58]	Al-Halwachi, A. (2023). The Power of Constructive Feedback in Education. LinkedIn.
[59]	Tala, J. (2022). How education should reward academic success. LinkedIn.
[60]	MindSage. (2021). Competition Culture in Schools: Healthy vs unhealthy competition + how to identify them in schools.
[61]	Watson, K. J. (2024). Secondary teachers’ perceived ability to support student mental health. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 35(1), 233-247.
[62]	Collopy, R. & Arnold, J. (2009). To blend or not to blend: online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18, 85-101.
[63]	Farley, A., Jain, A., & Thomson, D. (2011). Blended learning in finance: Comparing student perceptions of lectures, tutorials, and online learning environments across different year levels. Economic Papers, 30(1), 99-108.
[64]	Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.
[65]	Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
[66]	Field, A. (2013) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications Ltd.‏
[67]	Shrestha, N. (2020). Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 8(2), 39-42.