The Influence of the Schools of Mathematical Thought to the Development of Mathematics Education

Michael Gr. Voskoglou^1,

¹Department of Mathematical Sciences, Graduate Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, Patras, Greece

Cite this paper:
Michael Gr. Voskoglou. The Influence of the Schools of Mathematical Thought to the Development of Mathematics Education. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(9):1283-1288. doi: 10.12691/education-6-9-7

Abstract

In this article the effects of the ideas of the main schools of mathematical thought are studied on the development of mathematics education. Crucial problems that occupy nowadays the interest of those working in the field are also discussed, such as the future role of computers for the teaching and learning of mathematics. It is concluded that, although none of the existing schools of mathematical thought has succeeded in finding a solid framework for mathematics, most of the recent advances of this science were obtained through their disputations about the absolute mathematical truth. On the contrary, these disputations have created serious problems in the sensitive area of mathematics education, the most characteristic being the failure of the introduction of the “New Mathematics” to school education that distressed students and teachers for many years. The required thing for those working in this area of mathematics education is, without abandoning their persona; ideas, to search for a proper balance among the several philosophical aspects of mathematics. This will bring the required tranquillity in the area, in order to be developed smoothly for the benefit of the future generations.

Keywords:
philosophy of mathematics platonism formalism intuitionism logicism mathematics education problem-solving mathematical modeling computers in the teaching and learning of mathematics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Ernest, P., Social Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
[2]	Voskoglou, M. Gr., “Studying the Wingers Enigma about the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences”, American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 5(3), 95-100, 2017.
[3]	Livio, M., Is God a Mathematician? Simon & Schuster, London, 2009.
[4]	Wikipedia, “Philosophy of Mathematics Education”, retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_mathematics_educatinon August 3, 2018.
[5]	Ma, Li, “Towards a Yin-Yang Balance in Mathematics Education”, Proceedings 4th Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education, Palermo, Italy, pp.685-689, 2005.
[6]	Turing, A., “On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problem”, Proc. of the London Math. Soc., Series 2, 230-265, 1936.
[7]	Davis, P.J. & Hersh, R., The Mathematical Experience, Birkhauser, Boston, 1981.
[8]	Verstappen, P. F. L., “The pupil as a problem – solver”, in Steiner, H. G. & Vermandel A. (Eds.): Foundation and methodology of the discipline mathematics education (Proceedings 2nd, m. t. e. Conference, 1988.
[9]	Galbraith, P., “Mathematics Education and the Future: A long wave view of Change”, For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(3), 27-33, 1988.
[10]	Mandelbrot, B. B., The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W. H. Freeman and Company, 1983.
[11]	Shapiro, S., Thinking about Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
[12]	Kline, M., Why Johnny can’t add, St. Martin’s Press Inc., 1973.
[13]	Voskoglou, M. Gr., “Problem Solving from Polya to Nowadays: A Review an Future Perspectives”, in A. R. Baswell (Ed.): Advances in Mathematics Research, Vol. 12, Chapter 1, pp. 1-18, Nova Publishers, NY, 2011.
[14]	Polya, G., How to solve it, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1945.
[15]	Schoenfeld, A., “Teaching Problem Solving skills”, Amer. Math. Monthly, 87, 794-805, 1980.
[16]	Pollak H. O., “The interaction between Mathematics and other school subjects”, New Trends in Mathematics Teaching, Volume IV, Paris: UNESKO, 1979
[17]	Voskoglou, M. Gr., “Mathematical modelling as a teaching method of mathematics”, Journal for Research in Innovative Teaching, National University, CA, 8(1), 35-50, 2015.
[18]	Brown, S. I. & Walters, M. I., The Art of Problem Posing, Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990.
[19]	Owen E. & Sweller J., “Should Problem Solving be used as a learning device in Mathematics?”, J. for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 322-328, 1989.
[20]	Lawson M., “The case of instruction in the use of general problem solving strategies in Mathematics teaching: A comment on Owen and Sweller”, J. for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 403-410, 1990.
[21]	Voskoglou, M. G., “The Application Orientated Teaching of Mathematics”, Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics Education, Svishtov, Bulgaria, pp. 85-90, 2005.
[22]	Wing, J. M., “Computational thinking”. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33-35, 2006.
[23]	Voskoglou, M. Gr., Buckley, S., “Problem Solving and Computers in a Learning Environment”., Egyptian Computer Science Journal 36(4), 28-4, 2012
[24]	Voskoglou, M. Gr., “Remarks on and Examples of Mathematical Modelling Problems”, ICTMA Newsletter, 7(1), 11-13, 2014.
[25]	Voskoglou, M. Gr., “Teaching Mathematics or Mathematical Modelling? An Answer to a Comment.”, ICTMA Newsletter, 8(1), 12-13, 2015.