Developing Attitudes on Global Awareness Instrument of Senior High School’s Students

Aman Abadi Nugraha¹, Yetti Supriyati¹ and Awaluddin Tjalla^1,

¹Department of Educational Research and Evaluation, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Cite this paper:
Aman Abadi Nugraha, Yetti Supriyati and Awaluddin Tjalla. Developing Attitudes on Global Awareness Instrument of Senior High School’s Students. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(8):1213-1228. doi: 10.12691/education-6-8-22

Abstract

This study developed the attitudes on global awareness instrument of senior high school’s students. It used Research and Development (R&D) design which consisted of preliminary phase, product development, and product implementation (field test). The data were collected from 20 panels, the first phase of field test which consist of 250 students, and the second phase of field test which consist of 265 students. The data were analyzed by using factor analysis with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) method. The result of this study indicated that the standardized attitudes on global awareness instrument consist of 55 items with cognition, conation, and affection dimension with Composite Reliability (CR) was 0,933 and Variance Extracted (VE) was 0,824.

Keywords:
attitude global awareness the 21st Century Learning CFA instrument development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Azizy, A.Q. (2004). Melawan globalisasi: reinterpretasi ajaran Islam persiapan SDM dan terciptanya masyarakat madani. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[2]	Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[3]	BSNP. (2010). Paradigma Pendidikan Nasional Abad XXI. Versi 1.0. Jakarta: Author.
[4]	Burnouf, L. (2004). Global awareness and perspectives in global education. Canadian Social Studies, 38(3), 1-12.
[5]	Crawford, E. O., Kirby, M. M. (2008). Fostering students’ global awareness: technology applications in social teaching and learning. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction (JoCI), 2(1), 56-73.
[6]	DiStefano, C., Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: an empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(3), 225-241.
[7]	Izadi, P. (2012). World citizenship as an historical imperative: should global education be a compulsory element in teacher training?. International Journal of Global Education, 1(1), 75-82.
[8]	Kelly, A. (2017). Review of global perspective on higher education. Educational Review Journal, 24, 1.
[9]	Le, H. (2014). Vietnamese higher education in the context of globalization: qualitative or quantitative targets?. The International Journal Education Journal: Comparative Perspective, 13(1), 17-29.
[10]	Mary, L. K. (2016). Language issue and global education: a dilemma to Kenya. International Journal of Global Education, 5(2), 46-54.
[11]	Parkhouse, H., Glazier, J., Wagner, A. T., Cain, J. M. (2015). From local to global: making the leap in teacher education. International Journal of Global Education, 4(2), 10-29.
[12]	Trilling, B., Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
[13]	Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 685-701.
[14]	Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., Stewart, R. A. (2017). Worplace innovation: exploratory and corfirmatory factor analysis for construct validation. Management and Production Engineering Review, 8(2), 57-68.