Application of Type Cooperative Learning Models Missouri Mathematics Project (Mmp) to Increase Learning Results Math

Riska Novalia^1, , Makmuri¹, Ajat Sudrajat¹ and Adi Apriadi Adiansha¹

¹Department of Primary Education, State University of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

Cite this paper:
Riska Novalia, Makmuri, Ajat Sudrajat and Adi Apriadi Adiansha. Application of Type Cooperative Learning Models Missouri Mathematics Project (Mmp) to Increase Learning Results Math. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018; 6(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.12691/education-6-8-4

Abstract

This study aims to improve student learning outcomes fourth grade MI At-Taqwa 50 Mandala Jaya Tarumajaya Bekasi Regency. This research is an action research. The subjects of this study are all students of class IV which amounted to 28 students. Factors studied in the form of improved student learning outcomes. Instruments at each cycle. The data collected at each activity result of learning from cycle implementation, analyzed by using the mean of student learning result and percentage of student learning result which counted by descriptive percentage. The results showed that the average of students in the first cycle of 74.28 with 82% classical completeness increased average in cycle II to 83.92 with 93% classical completeness. When viewed from these results, the model of learning type of Missouri Mathematics Project to improve student learning outcomes in learning mathematics.

Keywords:
missouri mathematics project learning outcomes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Indonesia, P. R., Government Regulation No. 19 of 2005 on national education standards. (Ministry of National Education Republic of Indonesia, 2005).
[2]	OECD, PISA 2015 Results: What Students Know and Can Do-Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading, and Science (PISA: OECD Publishing, 2016).
[3]	TIMSS, Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced 2015 Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Students in Grades 4 and 8 and in Advanced Courses at the End of High School in International Context (Washington: NCES, IES, U.S. Department of Education Potomac Center Plaza, 2016).
[4]	Neal Shambaugh, and Susan G Magliaro, Instructional Design. (Boston: Person, 2006), p. 88
[5]	Kusnandar, Authentic Assessment. (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013), p. 62.
[6]	Nana Sudjana. Assessment of Learning Outcomes Teaching and Learning Process (Bandungremaja Rosda Karya, 2009). p. 22.
[7]	Aswin Saputra., Comparison of RBL and PBL on Student Learning Mathematics Learning Outcomes at MAN 12 Jakarta. (Research and Development Journal of Education Vol 2 No. 1 October 2015 ISSN 2406-9744: Lecturer of Informatics Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics, and Science University Indraprasta PGRI, 2015, p.6.
[8]	Muhammad Irwan Nur, Moh. Salam, Hasnawati., Effect of applying cooperative learning model type numbered heads together (NHT) to the results of learning mathematics students of class VII SMP Negeri 1 Tongkuno. (Journal of Mathematics Education Research Volume 4 No. 1 January 2016: Department of Mathematics Education FKIP Halu University Ole) p. 103-104.
[9]	Husnul Khotimah, the influence of quantum teaching model with the method of discussion on mathematics learning outcomes, Proceedings of Panel Discussion "Being a Learning Teacher" (Alumni Family of Indraprasta PGRI University Jakarta, April 8, 2017: Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and IPA Universitas Indrapasta PGRI, 2017), p. 79
[10]	Rachma Hanan Tiasto., Elly Arliani., Missouri Mathematics Project Learning Model with Two Stay Two Stray Method (National Seminar on Mathematics and Mathematics Education: UNY, 2015)
[11]	I Handayani., RL Januar., SE Purwanto., The effect of the Missouri mathematics project on student learning mathematical problem-solving abilities (ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education, Journal of Physics: Department of Mathematics Education, University Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka, Indonesia, 2018).
[12]	Winardi., Dwijanto., Mathematical Literacy Capability Analysis through the Missouri Mathematics Project Model with the Open-Ended Approach (Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research: Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2017).
[13]	N. Riski Utami Sari., N. Dantes., I M. Ardana., The Influence of Missouri Mathematics Project's Learning Model to Ability to Solve Mathematical Stories from Verbal Ability (Journal of Graduate Program of Ganesha University of Education: Ganesha Singaraja University of Education, Indonesia, 2014)
[14]	Tatik Wulandari., Hidayah Ansori., Influence of Missouri Mathematics Project Learning Model to Students' Ability in Solving Problems (EDU-MAT Journal of Mathematics Education: Mathematics Education FKIP Universitas Lambung Mangkura, 2013).
[15]	Indra Setyawan., Budiyono., Isnandar Slamet., The Comparison of Missouri Mathematics Project and Teams Games Tournament from Emotional Quotient Eight Grade Student of Junior School (The 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science: American Institute of Physics, 2017).
[16]	David Hopkins, A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Research translations Achmad Fawaid (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011), p. 87.
[17]	Wijaya Kusumah and Dedi Dwitagama, Know Your Classroom Action Research (Jakarta: Index, 2011), p. 121
[18]	Suroso, Classroom Action Research (Jogjakarta: Pararalon, 2009).
[19]	Trianto, Complete Class Action Research Guide (Jakarta: Achievement of Library, 2011), p. 11.