Quality of Implementation of the School Health Program in Oyo State, South-West Nigeria: A Rural-Urban Comparative Survey

Ayodeji Matthew Adebayo^1, and Eme T. Owoaje²

¹Department of Community Medicine, P.O. Box 1517, UI Post Office, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

²UI Post Office, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Cite this paper:
Ayodeji Matthew Adebayo and Eme T. Owoaje. Quality of Implementation of the School Health Program in Oyo State, South-West Nigeria: A Rural-Urban Comparative Survey. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(4):307-313. doi: 10.12691/education-4-4-3

Abstract

Background: The implementation of the School Health Program (SHP) is core to the realization of the goal of National Policy on Education. Despite the formulation and adoption of the National School Health Policy (NSHPo) in Nigeria in 2006, no study has been conducted to evaluate the quality of its implementation. This study was carried out to appraise the quality of implementation of the program in public primary schools in rural and urban Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Oyo State, Nigeria. Methodology: The study utilized a comparative cross-sectional design. A two-stage sampling technique was used to select 49 public primary schools; 26 rural and 23 urban, from two selected LGAs. Observational checklist (OC) was used to assess the SHP in the selected rural and urban schools from the LGAs. The checklist comprised of 4 sections; the school administrative information and implementation items for each of the three main components of the SHP as listed below i.e. School Health Services (SHS), School Health Education (SHE) and Healthful School Environment (HSE). The overall quality of implementation was measured by assessing the availability, appropriateness and functionality of basic health, sanitation and education facilities on a 79-point scale (SHS-21, SHE-10, HSE-48). Scores of <40%, 40-49% and ≥50% were categorized as poor, fair and good quality of implementation of the SHP respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22. Results: All the schools in both the urban and rural public primary schools had functional Parent Teacher Association. Neither the rural nor the urban public primary schools had trained first aiders, school health assistants or school health nurses. Even though most (87.8%) of the schools had first aid boxes (rural-100% versus urban-73.9%), 56.5% and 23.1% of the first aid boxes in the urban and rural public schools contained nothing. Only 8.7% of the urban schools had a sick bay. None of the public primary schools in both the rural and urban locations had major communicable health problems, HIV/AIDS education and use and abuse of drugs in their health instruction curriculum. Majority of the schools in the rural locations (88.5%) had sources of water supply compared with 10 (43.5%) of the schools in urban LGAs. Some (38.8%) of the schools had refuse bins located either on the corridors or at the corners of the classrooms. Higher proportions of schools in the urban areas (27.8%) had dustbins compared with (20.7%) of the rural schools. Overall, (59.2%) schools had poor quality of implementation of the SHP (rural-65.4% versus urban- 52.2%). Conclusion: The study revealed poor quality of implementation of the school health program in the selected rural and urban public primary schools in Oyo State as various essential equipment/items for effective school service delivery were either inadequate or lacking. There is a need for concerted efforts to improve/upgrade the standard of the program in both rural and urban public primary schools in the State.

Keywords:
quality of implementation school health program rural-urban public primary school

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Okeahialam TC. The school health program in Nigeria: A Paediatrician’s perspective. Keynote address: 34th Annual General Meeting and Scientific Conference of the Paediatric Association of Nigeria 2003.
[2]	Federal Ministry of Education, Nigeria. The national school health policy. Federal Ministry of Education, Abuja, Nigeria 2006, pp 10-13.
[3]	Ogundele BO. School Health Program. In Moronkola OA, ed. Essentials of Human Kinetics and Health Educationn Ibadan, Nigeria: Codat Publications 1999: 178-193.
[4]	Fajewonyomi BA and Afolabi JS, Administration of school health program in Nigeria. Nig. Sch. Jr., 1993; 8(1): 40-45.
[5]	Ademuwagun ZA and Oduntan SO. A School Health Education Handbook Ibadan: University Press Limited, 1986.
[6]	Akinteye JO. An appraisal of the school health program in public secondary schools in Ibadan metropolis. MPH thesis, 2005:135.
[7]	Agusiegbe GO. Teacher preparation for health teaching in primary schools: Primary Health Care Strategy for All in the Year 2000. Nig Schl Hlth J 1988; 7:61-8.
[8]	Eke AN. School education: a neglected primary healthcare component. Nig Schl Hlth J 1988; 7: 105-9.
[9]	Connel DR, Torner RR, Manson EF. Summary of funding of the school health education evaluation. Health promotion affection implementation and costs. Journal of School Health, 1985; 55(8): 316-321.
[10]	Allansmith M, Mead O. The Economic Impact of AIDS: “Shocks, Responses, Outcomes”. Technical working paper 1. World Bank, Africa Technical Department, Human Resources and Poverty Division, Washington DC.
[11]	Kolbe KJ. Developing a plan of action to institutionalize comprehensive school health education program in the United States. Journal of School Health 1993; 63(91): 12-13).
[12]	Nigerian Educational Research Development Council. 9-year Basic Education curriculum, Physical and Health Education 2007
[13]	Focusing Resources on Effective School Health. Core Intervention 3: Skill Based Health Education. Available at: http//www.freshschools.org/education.htm (Last accessed on 11th July, 2015).
[14]	Ofovwe GE, Ofili AN. Knowledge, attitude and practice of school health program among head teachers of primary schools in Egor Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria [abstract]. Ann Afri Med 2007 Sep; 6(3): 99-103.
[15]	Esrey SA, Potash JB, Roberts L, Schiff C. Effects of Improved Water Supply and Sanitation (Excreta disposal) on ascariasis, diarrhea, drancunculiasis, hookworm, schistosomiasis and trachoma. “Bulletin of the World Health Organization”; 65(5): 602-21.
[16]	O'Reilly CE, Freeman MC, Ravani M, Migele J, Mwaki A, Ayalo M, Ombeki S, R. M. Hoekstra RM, Quick R. The impact of a school-based safe water and hygiene program on knowledge and practices of students and their parents: Nyanza Province, western Kenya, 2006. Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Jan; 136(1): 80-91.
[17]	UNICEF, Progress of Nations 1997, p. 13.
[18]	Focusing Resources on Effective School Health. Core Intervention 2: Provision of Safe Water and Sanitation School. Available at: http//www.freshschools.org/education.htm (Last accessed on 10th July, 2015).