Critical Perspective on Language Teaching to Establish Indonesian Society that Have Critical Language Awareness

Anang Santoso^1,

¹Faculty of Letter, State University of Malang, Indonesia

Cite this paper:
Anang Santoso. Critical Perspective on Language Teaching to Establish Indonesian Society that Have Critical Language Awareness. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(3):273-282. doi: 10.12691/education-4-3-8

Abstract

This paper aims to provide an alternative paradigm of language teaching which is expected to form the students to have a critical language awareness. Indonesian society is still dealing with the dominance of various public discourse that does not enlighten the public. After "consuming" the dominant discourse generated by Soeharto's New Order regime within 32 years, the people of Indonesia are still faced with many viewpoints tend not to enlighten are produced by the mass media editors, genders activists, political elites, advertising producers, and religious leaders. People are increasingly confused and even frustrated at not being able to understand well the various public discourse. There are no rights and obligations in generating and interpreting public discourse. Consumers are especially disadvantaged in the various public communications. This condition should be the concern of education, particularly language teaching. Students should be taught critical perspective from an early age so that they are sensitive to the use of language that seem "innocent", but actually oppressive. Unfortunately, the conditions that have not been addressed properly by the designer of Indonesian language teaching (ILT). ILT in the curriculum 1984, 1994, and 2006 using a communicative approach that aims to achieve the student's ability to communicate through four language skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. The ILT is still not able to produce students or people who have a critical language awareness, as a condition to form a civil society. Students are no longer sensitive to the details in respect of the use of language in communication: effectiveness, politeness, ideology, and power. Therefore, there must be a paradigm shift in language teaching, the prioritization of critical perspectives in developing the language curriculum to achieve emancipation. It is suitable for a nation-state that had experienced a very long colonization by other nations, in this case, Indonesia. The spirit of this emancipation can be tracked on the Frankfurt school of sociology, systemic functional linguistics, and critical linguistics or critical discourse studies. Since the beginning of the student should be introduced and naturalized to the role and function of language as a semiotic instrument in shaping human culture.

Keywords:
critical perspectives indonesian language teaching critical language awareness

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Alim, H.S., “Critical Language Awareness”, In Homberger, N.H. & McKay, S.L. (Eds), Sociolinguistics and Language Education, Multilingual Matters, Bristol UK, 2010, 205-231.
[2]	Allmann, P., Revolutionary Social Transformaion: Democratic Hope, Political Possibilities and Critical Education, Bergin & Garvey, London, 1998.
[3]	Bertens, K., Filsafat Barat Abad XX Jilid II: Prancis, Gramedia Publisher, Jakarta, 1985.
[4]	Bizzell, P., “Power, Authority, and Critical Pedagogy”, Journal of Basic Writing, 10 (2), 54-70, 1991.
[5]	Bolinger, D., Language-The Loaded Weapon: The Use and Abuse of Language Today, Longman Group Limited, London, 1980.
[6]	Block, D. & Cameron, D., “Introduction”, In Block, D. & Cameron, D. (Eds.), Globalization and Language Teaching, Routledge, London, 2002, 1-10.
[7]	Butt, D., Fahey, R., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C., Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide, Macquary University, Sydney, 1995.
[8]	Cameron, D., “Globalization and the Teaching of Communication Skills”, In Block, D. & Cameron, D. (Eds.), Globalization and Language Teaching, Routledge, London, 2002, 67-82.
[9]	Cavallaro, D., Teori Kritis dan Teori Budaya, Translated by Laily Rahmawati, SUFIBOOKS, Yogyakarta, 2004.
[10]	Crystal, D., A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Third Edition, Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, 1991.
[11]	Fairclough, N., Language and Power, Longman Group UK Limited, New York, 1989.
[12]	Fairclough, N., Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1992.
[13]	Fairclough, N., “Pendahuluan”, In Fairclough, N. (Ed.), Kesadaran Bahasa Kritis, Translated by Hartoyo, IKIP Semarang Press, Semarang, 1995a, 1-33.
[14]	Fairclough, N., Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, Longman Group Limited, Harlow-Essex, 1995b.
[15]	Fowler, R., Linguistic Criticism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986.
[16]	Fowler, R., “On Critical Linguistics”, In Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. & Coulthard, M. (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Reading in Critical Discourse Analysis, Routledge, London, 1996, 3-14.
[17]	Freire, P., Pedagogy of the Oppresed, Herder and Herder, New York, 1971.
[18]	Freire, P., Education for Critical Consciousness, Continuum, London & New York, 1974.
[19]	Freire, P., Politics and Education, University of California, UCLA Latin American Center Publications, LA, 1988.
[20]	Freire, P., “Tidak Ada Mengajar Tanpa Belajar”, Taken from Pedagogy of Freedom, Translated by Eka Kurniawan. Wacana: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Transformatif, 4 (15), 11-26, 2003.
[21]	Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity, Polite Press, Cambridge, 1990.
[22]	Giroux, H.A., Border Crossing: A Cultural Workers and Politics of Education, Routledge, New York, 1993.
[23]	Giroux, H. A. & Mclaren, P., “Teacher Education and the Politics of Engagement: The Case for Democratic Schooling”, In P. Leistyna, A. Woodrum, & S.A. Sherblom (Eds.), Breaking Free: The Transformative Power of Critical Pedagogy, Harvard Educational Review, Cambridge, MA, 1996, 301-331.
[24]	Goomansingh, R.V., Using Critical Pedagogy to Educate for Democracy in the Graduate Classroom, Unpublished Thesis, Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, 2009.
[25]	Halliday, M.A.K., Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, Edward Arnold, London, 1978.
[26]	Halliday, M.A.K., “The Act of Meaning”, In Webster, J. (Ed.), On Language and Linguistics Volume III: Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, Continuum, London, 2003, 375-389.
[27]	Halliday, M.A.K. & Mathhiessen, C.M.I.M., An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Third Edition. Hodder Arnold, London, 2004.
[28]	Hawkins, M., & Norton, B., “Critical Language Teacher Education”, In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.), Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009, 30-39.
[29]	Hodge, R. & Kress, G., Language as Ideology, Second Edition, ROUTLEDGE, London & New York, 1993.
[30]	Livingstone, D.W., “On Hegemony in Corporate Capitalist States: Materialist Structures, Ideological Forms, Class Consciousness and Hegemonic Acts”, Sociological Inquiry, 3 (4), 235-250, 1976.
[31]	Luke, A. & Dooley, K., “Critical Literary and Second Language Learning”, In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Second Language Teaching and Learning, Vol. 2, Routledge, New York, 2009.
[32]	McLaren, P., Life in School: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundation of Education, Longman, New York, 1998.
[33]	McLaren, P., “Critical Pedagogy: A Look at the Major Concepts”, In The Critical Pedagogy Reader, ROUTLEDGE Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2009, 61-83.
[34]	Nuryatno, M.A., “Teori Kritis dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Aliran Pendidikan Kritis”, Wacana, 4 (15), 27-60, 2003.
[35]	Nuryatno, M.A., Madzab Pendidikan Kritis: Menyingkap Relasi Pengetahuan Politik dan Kekuasaan, Resist Book, Yogyakarta, 2008.
[36]	Santoso, A., “Studi Wacana Kritis, Pengajaran Bahasa, dan Perspektif Emansipasi”, in International Conference on Applied Linguistics V (CONAPLIN V): Language Teacher Development in a Globalized World, Language Center and English Education Department, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung, 2012a, 28-35.
[37]	Santoso, A., Studi Bahasa Kritis: Menguak Bahasa, Membongkar Kuasa, Mandar Maju Publisher, Bandung, 2012b.
[38]	Santoso, A., Membongkar Keangkuhan Wacana Publik, Intrans Press, Malang, 2015.
[39]	Shor, I., When Students Have Power: Negotiating Authority in a Critical Pedagogy, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1996.
[40]	van Dijk, T., “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”, In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S.J. (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, SAGE Publications Ltd, London, 2001, 300-317.
[41]	Wodak, R., Disorders of Discourse, Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Harlow-Essex, 1996.