Sustainable Leadership: Impact of an Innovative Leadership Development Program for School Principals in Palestine

Louis Cristillo¹, Nuha Iter^2, and Alia Assali³

¹Teacher Education Department, AMIDEAST, Ramallah, Palestine

²Teacher Qualification Program, Palestine Technical University - Khadorie, Tulkarem, Palestine

³Faculty of Educational Sciences and Teacher Training, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine

Cite this paper:
Louis Cristillo, Nuha Iter and Alia Assali. Sustainable Leadership: Impact of an Innovative Leadership Development Program for School Principals in Palestine. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(2A):37-42. doi: 10.12691/education-4-2A-6

Abstract

Since its establishment in 1994 following the Oslo Accords between Israel and the PLO, Palestine’s Ministry of Education and Higher Education has undertaken the formidable task of developing a full-fledged educational system. From its beginnings, and with funding support from international and bilateral donors, a key pillar of the Ministry’s policymaking has been the ongoing professional development of school principals. In 2008, the Ministry launched the Palestinian Education Development Strategic Plan/2008-2012 (EDSP), a comprehensive reform package aimed at shoring up gaps in the educational system, with a particular emphasis on improving the quality of school leadership and instruction. USAID, in response to the EDSP, contracted AMIDEAST, a US-based nonprofit organization with a long history of cultural exchange and educational development in the MENA region, to pilot a teacher and principal professional development program, the Model Schools Network (MSN). The program began with 17 private schools in the West Bank and then expanded in 2009 to 40 public schools, and a year later added 12 private schools in Gaza. The program ended in 2012. The centerpiece of MSN’s leadership training was the Leadership Diploma Program, a 340-hour school-based professional development initiative comprised of monthly face-to-face sessions and learning circles, job-embedded assignments linked to authentic issues facing principals in their daily work, and reflective inquiry through action research. The program was framed by knowledge and competences grounded in principles of shared leadership and international standards aligned with research on effective schools. Now three years after the close-out of MSN, our study sought to find out whether MSN has had a sustainable impact on the attitudes and practices of principals as leaders of their school communities in general and as instructional leaders in particular. Results from a survey and in-depth interviews with former MSN principals offer promising evidence that the MSN model of shared leadership appears to have had a sustained impact on the attitudes and practices of principals in three key domains: technology and community building; results-based decision-making; and, instructional supervision.

Keywords:
principal school leadership professional development model schools network effective school Palestine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Shinn, C. (2012). Teacher Education Reform in Palestine: Policy Challenges amid Donor Expectations. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 608-633.
[2]	Cristillo, L. (2010). Struggling for the center: Teacher-centered vs. learner-centered practices in Palestinian higher education. Higher Education and the Middle East, 2, 37-40.
[3]	Mahshi, K. (2001). Developing education in Palestine: a continuing challenge. International Institute for Educational Planning Newsletter, XIX(3), 3-4.
[4]	MOEHE. (1996). First Palestinian Curriculum Plan. Ramallah: Ministry of Education and Higher Education.
[5]	Mahshi, K. (2001). Developing education in Palestine: a continuing challenge. International Institute for Educational Planning Newsletter, XIX(3), 3-4.
[6]	Shinn, C. (2012). Teacher Education Reform in Palestine: Policy Challenges amid Donor Expectations. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 608-633.
[7]	Shinn, C. (2012). Teacher Education Reform in Palestine: Policy Challenges amid Donor Expectations. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 608-633.
[8]	Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times: McGraw-Hill International.
[9]	Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581-584.
[10]	Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The Seven Principles of Sustainable Leadership. Educational leadership, 61(7), 8.
[11]	MOEHE. (2010). Improvement School Guide Based on Effective School Standards. Ramallah: Ministry of Education and Higher Education.
[12]	Cortez-Rucker, V., Adams, N., & Cortez-Rucker, S. (2013). Effective Schools: A Brief Review after Forty Years. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(5).
[13]	Peterson, K. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213-232.
[14]	Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership project. New York: The Wallace Foundation.
[15]	Lezotte, L. W. (1991). Correlates of effective schools: The first and second generation. Okemos, MI: Effective Schools Products, Ltd.
[16]	Williams, T., Kirst, M., & Haertel, E. (2005). Similar Students, Different Results: Why Do Some Schools Do Better? A Large-Scale Survey of California Elementary Schools Serving Low-Income Students. Initial Report of Findings. EdSource.
[17]	Leskiw, S.-L., & Singh, P. (2007). Leadership development: learning from best practices. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(5), 444-464.
[18]	Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr, M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs (Vol. 6): Stanford Educational Leadership Institute Stanford, CA.
[19]	Leithwood, K., & Seashore-Louis, K. (2011). Linking leadership to student learning: John Wiley & Sons.
[20]	Ndiga, B., Mumuikha, C., Flora, F., & Ngugi, M. (2014). Principals’ Transformational Leadership Skills in Public Secondary Schools: A Case of Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions and Academic Achievement in Nairobi County, Kenya. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(9), 801-810.
[21]	Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
[22]	Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
[23]	The authors wish to thank Dr. Mohammed Matar, Director, Assessment & Evaluation Department of the Ministry of Education, Ramallah, Palestine, and Mr. Robert Davidson of the USAID West Bank and Gaza (WBG) Mission for bringing this information to our attention.
[24]	Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications.
[25]	Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451.
[26]	Hargreaves, A. (1997). Cultures of teaching and educational change. International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1297-1319): Springer.
[27]	Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times: McGraw-Hill International.
[28]	Peterson, K. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213-232.
[29]	DuFour, R. (2003). Building a professional learning community. School Administrator, 60(5), 13-18.
[30]	Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2000). The Three Dimensions of Reform. Educational leadership, 57(7), 30-33.
[31]	Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451.
[32]	Schlechty, P. C. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse: How to support and sustain educational innovation: Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA.
[33]	Earl, L., & Fullan, M. (2003). Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 383-394.
[34]	Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581-584.
[35]	Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). Effective instructional leadership Teachers' perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130-141.