Functional Continuity in Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings: Evaluating a Studio Experience

Nilüfer Sağlar Onay¹ and Deniz Ayşe Yazıcıoğlu^1,

¹Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Interior Architecture, Taşkışla, 34437 Taksim, Istanbul/Turkey

Cite this paper:
Nilüfer Sağlar Onay and Deniz Ayşe Yazıcıoğlu. Functional Continuity in Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings: Evaluating a Studio Experience. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(6):674-682. doi: 10.12691/education-3-6-2

Abstract

Interior architecture is mainly concerned with adapting existing buildings to new uses and requirements. While determining the extent of intervention, the historic and cultural background of the building plays a very important role. Therefore in adaptive reuse, before starting to develop design proposals, buildings of cultural significance need to be analyzed carefully in order to determine architectural and spatial potentials. This paper aims to evaluate the process and results of a design studio, which was realized during 2014-2015 Fall Semester in the ITU Department of Interior Architecture. The main purpose of the studio experience was to create adaptive reuse proposals for a historic commercial building by focusing on the theme of “functional unity”. In the first phase of the study, course program was organized in three basic steps: analyzing spatial potential, determining compatible use and developing project proposals. At the end of every step there was a jury to evaluate each phase. Every step had its own priorities and criteria for the jury. After evaluations project proposals were classified according to their main foci as well as advantages and disadvantages of different approaches in terms of functional unity. As a result it was observed that in historic buildings there are different ways of maintaining functional unity based on the intention of the intervention. While identifying compatible use or uses for a historic building, functional unity needs to be evaluated as one of the basic design criteria in order to retain its cultural significance. This is mainly because a historic building can fully reveal it’s potential only if it is experienced and evaluated as a whole.

Keywords:
historic buildings reuse spatial analysis spatial potentials functional continuity compatible use

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Aksu, D., Çorlulu Ali Paşa Hanı'nın Restorasyon Projesi, Master Thesis, ITU Graduate School of Science, Engineering and Technology, 1999.
[2]	Cezar, M., Typical Commercial Buildings of the Ottoman Classical Period and the Ottoman Construction Systems, Türkiye Iş Bankası Cultural Publications, Istanbul, 1983.
[3]	Gülenaz, N., Batılılaşma Dönemi İstanbul’unda Hanlar ve Pasajlar, İTO Yayınları, Istanbul, 2011.
[4]	Sağlar Onay, N., "Orjinal Drawings", 2015.
[5]	Weeks, K.D. and Grimmer, A.E., The Secretary of the Interior’s standards for the treatment of historic properties: with guidelines for preserving, rehabilitating, restoring & reconstructing historic buildings, A.E. U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships Heritage Preservation Services Washington, D.C., 1995.
[6]	Sağlar Onay, N., "A Framework to Analyse Historic Buildings and Interiors", 2015 Stremah, Coruba, Spain, on publication process.
[7]	ICOMOS, “The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance-The Burra Charter”, 2013, [Online] Available: http://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Burra-Charter-2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf [Accessed March.15, 2015].
[8]	Jenkins, E., Drawn to Design: Analyzing Architecture through Freehand Drawing, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2012.
[9]	Akpınar, O., “The Conceptual Diagram of A Student Work”, ITU Interior Architecture Project III, 2014-2015 Fall Semester.
[10]	Ertuğrul, E., An Inquiry Into Architectural Scenario, Master Thesis, METU Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara, 2005.
[11]	Cetin, A., “The Conceptual Representation of The Scenario” ITU Interior Architecture Project III, 2014-2015 Fall Semester.
[12]	ICOMOS, “The Venice Charter-1964”, 2nd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice.
[13]	Van Balen, K., E. P., Ercan, A.S. and Patricio, T.C., Compatibility and Retreatability Versus Reversibility: A Case Study at the Late Hellenistic Nymphaeum of Sagalassos in The Use and the Need for Preservation Standarts in Architectural Conservation, Fredericksburg: ASTM Publications, 1999.
[14]	Winter, J., Conserving Buildings of the Modern Movement In Understanding Historic Building Conservation, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2007.
[15]	Sağlar Onay, N., “Evaluating Partial Reuse of Historical Buildings as Commercial Interiors: A Case Study in Florence”, The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial and Environmental Design, Volume 7, 2014.
[16]	Forsyth, Michael. 2007. “The past in the Future.” In Understanding Historic Building Conservation edited by Michael Forsyth, 1-8. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[17]	Szczepińska,D., “Student Proposal, Section-Elevation From Courtyard”, ITU Interior Architecture Project III, 2014-2015 Fall Semester.
[18]	Dadakoğlu, R., “Student proposal, ground floor plan”, ITU Interior Architecture Project III, 2014-2015 Fall Semester.
[19]	Sağlar Onay N., "Spatial Potentials and Functional Continuity in Historic Buildings", 2015 Re-Cond, Istanbul, Turkey, on publication process.
[20]	Sima, Z., “Student Proposal, Ground Floor Plan and Section”, ITU Interior Architecture Project III, 2014-2015 Fall Semester.
[21]	McCallum, Duncan. 2007. “Regeneration and the Historic Environment.” In Understanding Historic Building Conservation edited by Michael Forsyth, 35-45, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.