From Conceptualization to Reflection: Ensuring Robust Clinical Experiences While Meeting the Professional Standards for Elementary Special Education Teachers

Sheilah M. Paul^1,

¹School of Liberal Arts & Education, Medgar Evers College of CUNY, Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY

Cite this paper:
Sheilah M. Paul. From Conceptualization to Reflection: Ensuring Robust Clinical Experiences While Meeting the Professional Standards for Elementary Special Education Teachers. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(2):173-184. doi: 10.12691/education-3-2-10

Abstract

A major challenge for teacher candidates is meeting the demands of the clinical practice experience which assesses how they make connections between their theoretical knowledge base and the real classroom experience. The critical integration of knowledge of and pedagogy in academic subjects, the use of research-based, scientifically proven strategies and assessment practices, and the understanding of the culturally and linguistically diverse learning needs of students at various developmental levels based on specialty professional standards form the basis for successful teaching and learning. It is this foundation that aids teachers in meeting the multiple teacher licensure requirements across States. Guiding teacher candidates in thinking about, planning, implementing and reflecting on these elements require a systematic approach to clinical practice. This Conceptualization to Reflection Model provides a unique approach for clinical supervisors and cooperating teachers to preparing professional teachers to meet the rigors of the teaching profession. It also serves as a guide for teacher candidates to help them navigate the journey from student to practitioner. Since each teacher preparation program serves a distinct student population, this comprehensive model is presented for one specific degree program: Childhood Special Education (Dual Certificate – Grades 1-6), but can be easily adapted to meet the diverse needs and developmental levels of other student populations.

Keywords:
pre-service teacher education special education clinical practice student teaching

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Ansell, S. C., & McCabe, M. (2003). To close the gap, quality counts: Off target. Quality Counts-Education Week, Vol. 22 (17) p7, 57-58.
[2]	Association for Childhood Education International. (1998-2002). Position Paper: Preparation of Elementary Teachers. Author. Retrieved on October, 12, 2014 from http://www.acei.org.
[3]	Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is--or might be--the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8.
[4]	Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation [CAEP]. (2013). CAEP Accreditation Standards and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Authors.
[5]	Council for Exceptional Children. (2002). NCATE/CEC program standards, preparation of special education teachers. Arlington, VA: Authors.
[6]	Darling-Hammond, L., & Baratz-Snowden, J. (Eds.). (2005). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve, pp. 38-39. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[7]	Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Will 21st-century schools really be different? The Education Digest, 60, 4-8.
[8]	Elliott, E. (Ed.). (2003). Assessing education candidate performance: A look at changing practices. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
[9]	Gersten, R., Keating, T., Yovanoff, P., & Harniss, M. K. (2001). Working in special education: Factors that enhance special educators’ intent to stay. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 549-567.
[10]	Grimmet, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant Ed.), Review of Research in Education 18, pp. 59-74, Washington, DC: AERA.
[11]	Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159-165.
[12]	Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[13]	National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education [NCATE]. (2010). Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers. Washington, D. C.: Author.
[14]	New York City Department of Education. (2012). Raising the bar for all students: New York City’s special education reform. Author. Retrieved on October 3, 2014 from http://www.nycdoe.gov.
[15]	Ornstein, A. C., Thomas, J., & Lasley, I. (2000). Strategies for effective teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[16]	Ronfeldt, M. (2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach? Effects of field placement school characteristics on teacher retention and effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34:1, 3-26.
[17]	Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-22.
[18]	Shulman, L. (1992, September-October). Ways of seeing, ways of knowing, ways of teaching, ways of learning about teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 393-396.
[19]	Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[20]	University of Northern Iowa, Intime. (1999-2002). Retrieved September 27, 2014 http://www.intime@uni.edu.
[21]	Wiggins, G. P. (1998) Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.