Enhancing Student Achievement: School and Community Learning Partnership

Tony Trinick^1,

¹The University of Auckland Barbara Alaalatoa, Sylvia Park School Ariana Williams, Mutukaroa

Cite this paper:
Tony Trinick. Enhancing Student Achievement: School and Community Learning Partnership. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(2):126-136. doi: 10.12691/education-3-2-4

Abstract

In Aotearoa/New Zealand, there has been considerable disparity in student achievement between Māori (indigenous people of NZ) and Pasifika students and their European peers. Initially, the cause of this underachievement was generally attributed to a lack of parental interest in schooling. Therefore, many schools in New Zealand, particularly those with diverse communities, have been grappling with the challenge of engaging constructively with families for a number of years. Despite the best of intentions, many of the home/school partnership initiatives have failed to positively affect student achievement. Nonetheless, there are success stories. This paper reports on a successful home/school partnership project, Mutukaroa, initiated by Sylvia Park School in 2010 in consultation with its local school community. The elements that make up the intervention and the results are discussed. The research used a quasi-experimental design to investigate cause and effect relationships. The qualitative data indicates that parents and community members have developed very positive relationships with project team members and the school. Parents feel much more confident engaging in discussions with the teacher about their child’s learning and feel more capable of supporting learning at home. The longitudinal student achievement data in literacy show very positive longitudinal trends. The outstanding results of the initiative compelled the Ministry of Education to fund an expansion and adaptation of the Mutukaroa model into another 100 schools throughout New Zealand. The principal (Mrs. Alaalatoa) and project director (Ms. Williams) have had important leadership roles in the efforts to expand a localised grassroots initiative into a large-scale state education initiative. This paper discusses, from their perspective, the success and challenges of implementing the Mutukaroa model into different contexts with a variety of agencies involved.

Keywords:
student achievement partnership

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Bull, A., Brooking, K., & Campbell, R. (2008). Successful home-school partnerships. Report to the Ministry of Education by the New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
[2]	Biddulph, F., Biddulph, J., & Biddulph, C. (2003). The complexity of community and family influences on children’s achievement in New Zealand: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
[3]	Bishop, R. & Glyn, T. (1999). Culture Counts: Changing power relations in education. Auckland, NZ: Dunmore Press
[4]	Bishop, R., & Berryman, M. (2006). Culture Counts: Cultural relationships and classroom learning. Wellington, NZ: Huia
[5]	Chapple, S., Jefferies, R., & Walker, R. (1997). Maori participation and performance in education. A literature review and research programme. Report for the Ministry of Education. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Institute of Economic Research.
[6]	Coxon, E., Anae, M., Mara, D., Wendt-Samu, T., & Finau, C. (2002). Literature Review on Pacific Education Issues. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
[7]	Elley, W. (1992). How in the world do students read? The IEA study of reading literacy. The Hague, Netherlands: International Associations for the Evaluation of educational Achievement.
[8]	Garcia Coll, C. T., & Magnuson, K. (2000). Cultural differences as sources of developmental vulnerabilities and resources: A view from developmental research. In S .J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 94-111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[9]	Gorinski, R., & Fraser, C. (2006). Literature review on the effective engagement of Pasifika parents and communities in education (PISCPL). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
[10]	Green, J., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. (2006). Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[11]	Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
[12]	Hawe, E., Dixon, H., Williams, R. & and Tuck, B. (2003). School assessment tasks: Why do teachers use them or not? Set, 2, 18-21
[13]	Heinsman, D., & Shadish, W. (1996). Assignment methods in experimentation: When do nonrandomized experiments approximate the answers from randomized experiments? Psychological Methods, 1 (2), 154-169.
[14]	Hohepa, M. (1997). Equity issues in language/literacy education in New Zealand. In J. Biddulph (Ed.), Language/literacy education: Diversity and challenge (pp. 65-71). Waikato, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
[15]	Hoover-Dempsey, K., Bassler, O. & Brissie, J. (1987). Parental involvement L Contributions of teacher efficacy, school economic status, and other school characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 85, 289-294.
[16]	Hoover-Demsey, K. & Sandler, H. (1995). Parental Involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97 (2), 311-331.
[17]	Meaney, T. (2002). Symbiosis or cultural clash? Indigenous students learning mathematics. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23 (2), 167-187.
[18]	Martin-Kniep, G.O., Cunningham, D. & Feige, D. M. (1998). Why am I doing this?: Purposeful teaching through portfolio assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
[19]	Ministry of Education (1997). School Entry Assessment. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media
[20]	Ministry of Education (2005). Making a Bigger Difference for all Students: The Schooling Strategy 2005-2010. Wellington, NZ: Author
[21]	Ministry of Education. (2011). Engaging with families from diverse cultural and linguist backgrounds. NZ Curriculum Update 10. Wellington, New Zealand: Author
[22]	Minister of Education. (2013). $27 million investment in education initiatives aimed at priority children. Retrieved from
[23]	Mitchell, L., Wylie, C., & Carr, M. (2008). Outcomes of early childhood education: Literature review. A report by the New Zealand Council for Educational Research for the Ministry of Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
[24]	Neuman, S. & Dickinson, D. (2001). Introduction. In Susan B. Neuman & David K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 3-10). New York: Guilford Press
[25]	Phillips, G., McNaughton, S., & MacDonald, S. (2004). Managing the mismatch: Enhancing early literacy progress for children with diverse language and cultural identities in mainstream urban schools in New Zealand. Journal of Educational Psychology. 96 (2), 309-324.
[26]	Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[27]	Slavin, R. (2007). Educational research in an age of accountability. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
[28]	Snow, C.; Burns, S. & Griffin, Peg (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[29]	Timperly, H. & Earl, L. (2012). Learning and change networks. A background paper on Designing Networks to Make a Difference. Report to the Ministry of Education. Auckland, NZ: Uniservices
[30]	Tuafuti, P. (2010). Additive bilingual education: Unlocking the culture of silence. MAI Review, 1-14.
[31]	Wylie, C. (1999). Ten years on: How schools view educational reform. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
[32]	Wylie, C. (2001). Ten years old and competent: The fourth stage of the competent children project-A summary of the main findings. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.