English Language Learning in a Community Setting: Creating Pathways for Civic Engagement

Melissa Lavitt¹ and Diane Boothe^2,

¹Academic Affairs, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA

²Literacy, Language and Culture, Boise State University, Boise, USA

Cite this paper:
Melissa Lavitt and Diane Boothe. English Language Learning in a Community Setting: Creating Pathways for Civic Engagement. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(1):43-48. doi: 10.12691/education-3-1-9

Abstract

Actively engaging community members and incorporating a problem-based learning (PBL) model in a community setting strengthens English language acquisition. This transformational learning strategy is based on three elements; achieving success in English language learning (ELL) through innovative pedagogy, creating hands-on PBL real world activities to empower students, and supporting learning by building community partnerships and fostering collaboration. Community members actively engaged in robust ELL contribute economic, societal and cultural benefits and create new avenues to inspire creativity and enthusiasm for learning. By utilizing PBL methods that empower critical thinking and incorporate real world experiences and pathways for civic engagement, ELL becomes a collaborative effort rewarded by communication with community leaders who will challenge students and strengthen learning. Implementation of this innovative PBL multi-dimensional model engages and motivates all learners, including those from underserved populations, and provides the opportunity to build relationships and connect with community members in ways that they never thought possible. Integrated technologies can also be utilized to improve ELL instruction and build workplace skills across the spectrum of community responsibilities. Examples of ways to leverage a variety of community resources and professionals to transform ELL are provided. This approach can also be expanded to myriad contexts and disciplines incorporating content across the curriculum. The pedagogical potential including meaningful research opportunities and analytics, as well as strategies for ELL educators to frame best practices focused on the diverse learning needs of the students is discussed.

Keywords:
english language learning civic engagement problem-based learning community collaboration

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Othman, N. & Shah, M. (2013). Problem-Based Learning in the English Language Classroom. English Language Teaching. 6(3), 125-134.
[2]	Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning (PDF). Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[3]	Thomas, J.W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. http://bie.org/research/study/review_of_project_based_learning_2000
[4]	Neville, Alan J. (2009). "Problem-Based Learning and Medical Education Forty Years on". Medical Principles and Practice 18 (1): 1-9.
[5]	Purce, Thomas L (2014). "The Habit of Civic Engagement" in Civic Engagement, Civic Development, and Higher Education by Jill N. Reich (Ed.) Bringing Theory to Practice Series Washington, DC ©2014 by Bringing Theory to Practice.
[6]	Henk G Schmidt, Jerome I Rotgans, and Elaine HJ Yew. August 01, 2011. “The process of problem-based learning: what works and why.” History: from those who wrote it.
[7]	Julie Mathews-Aydinli. April 2007. “Problem-Based Learning and Adult English Language Learners.” Center for Applied Linguistics Brief.
[8]	Friedman, R. A., & Podolny, J. (1992). Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (1), 28-47. (cited in Weerts & Sandmann).
[9]	Klaudia M. Rivera. 1999. “Popular and Social Transformation: A Community-Based Approach to Critical Pedagogy.” A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
[10]	David J. Weerts, Lorilee R. Sandmenn (2010), "Community Engagement and Boundary-Spanning Roles at Research Universities. The Journal of Higher Education, Volume 81, Number 6, November/December, pp. 702-727.
[11]	Lynet Uttal. 2006. “Organizational Cultural Competency: Shifting Programs for Latino Immigrants from a Client-Centered to a Community-Based Orientation.” American Journal of Community Psychology.
[12]	Dana Frye. “Participatory Education as a Critical Framework for an Immigrant Women’s ESL Class.”
[13]	AASCU 2002, Stepping forward as Stewards of Place, American Association of State Colleges and Universities 1307 New York Avenue, NW • Fifth Floor • Washington, DC 20005-4701.
[14]	Furco, A. (2003). Self-assessment rubric for the institutionalization of service learning in higher education. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
[15]	Holland, B. A. (1997). Analyzing institutional commitment to service: A model of key organizational factors. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 30-41.
[16]	Cantor, Nancy & Englot, Peter (2014), "Civic Renewal of Higher Education through Renewed Commitment to the Public Good," in Civic Engagement, Civic Development, and Higher Education Edited by Jill N. Reich Bringing Theory to Practice Series Washington, DC ©2014 by Bringing Theory to Practice.
[17]	Donna Moss and Carol Van Duzer. 1998. “Project-Based Learning for Adult English Language Learners.” National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education.
[18]	David J. Weerts, Lorilee R. Sandmenn (2010), "Community Engagement and Boundary-Spanning Roles at Research Universities The Journal of Higher Education, Volume 81, Number 6, November/December, pp. 702-727.