Citation Practices in Selected Science and Humanities Dissertations: Implications for Teaching

Geoffrey Mokua Maroko^1,

¹Department of English and Linguistics, Kenyatta University, P.O. Nairobi, Kenya

Cite this paper:
Geoffrey Mokua Maroko. Citation Practices in Selected Science and Humanities Dissertations: Implications for Teaching. American Journal of Educational Research. 2013; 1(4):126-136. doi: 10.12691/education-1-4-3

Abstract

The citation feature provides justification for arguments and demonstrates the novelty of one’s position in research writing. It shows how a piece of research arises out of, and is grounded in the current state of disciplinary knowledge. As such, research supervisors encourage the candidates under their guidance to make citations especially when writing literature reviews and discussion sections of their dissertations. This requirement plunges many a student in confusion on how to go about this integral undertaking without written citation norms in their disciplines. The question that emerges is: On which benchmarks should dissertation writers base their citations when writing dissertations in their disciplines? Put in other words, on which benchmarks should research supervisors base their judgement on the quality of citations in their students’ dissertations? The aim of this paper therefore is to uncover citation practices in selected Humanities and Science dissertations from Kenyan public universities. The paper analyses the citation types and reporting verbs of choice employed in Humanities dissertations and compares them with those in the Science dissertations. Consequently, the paper proposes a set of citation norms that can inform the writing of the Humanities and Sciences dissertation and suggests a genre-based approach for raising students’ consciousness to the citation norms during the drafting stage of their dissertations.

Keywords:
citation integral and non-integral citations norms communities of practice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Thomas, S. and Hawes, T, “Citation as persuasion in research articles.” Language Forum, 3 (1 & 2). 92-111. 1995.
[2]	Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin. T, Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, 1995.
[3]	Hyland, K. “Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge,” Applied Linguistics, 20. 341-67. 1999.
[4]	Charles, M, “Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines.” English for Specific Purposes, 25. 310-331. 2006b.
[5]	Swales, J. “Citation analysis and discourse analysis.” Applied linguistics, 7 (1). 40-56. 1987.
[6]	Pecorari, D, “Good and original: Plagiarism and patch writing in academic second-language writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12. 317-345, 2003.
[7]	Harwood, N, “Citation analysis: A multidisciplinary perspective on academic literacy,” In M. Baynham, A. Deignan, & G. White (Eds.), Applied linguistics at the interface (pp. 79-89), BAAL and Equinox, London, 2004.
[8]	Thompson, P., and Tribble, C, “Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes,” Language Learning and Technology, 5 (3). 91-105. 2001.
[9]	Swales, J. & Feak, C.B, English in today’s research world: A writing guide, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 2000.
[10]	White, H., D. “Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited.” Applied linguistics, 25 (1). 89-116. 2004.
[11]	Swales, J, Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
[12]	Coe, R., Lingard, L., & Telsenko, T. (Eds.), The Rhetoric and ideology of genre. Hampton Press, USA Inc., 2002.
[13]	Bhatia, V. K., “A generic view of academic discourse,”In J. Flowerdew (Ed.) Academic Discourse, Longman, London, 2002.
[14]	Tadros, A, Prediction in text, The University of Birmingham, English Language Research, Birmingham, UK:, 1985.
[15]	Parry, S, “Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses.” Higher Education, 36 (3). 273-299. 1998.
[16]	Thompson, P, “Exploring the contexts of writing: Interviews with PhD supervisors,” In P. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in EAP writing research and instruction, CALS, Reading UK. 37-54. 1998.
[17]	Becher, T, Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines, The Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1989.
[18]	Myers, G, Writing Biology: Texts in social construction of scientific knowledge, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1990.
[19]	Becher, T., & Trowler, P, Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.), The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham, 2001.
[20]	Weissberg, R. & Buker, S. Writing up research. London: Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited. 1990.
[21]	Kelly, G. J., & Bazerman, C, “How students argue scientific claims, A rhetorical–semantic analysis,” Applied linguistics, 24 (1). 28-55. 2003.
[22]	Comrie, B, Tense, Cambridge University Press. London, 1987.
[23]	Malcolm, Lois, “What rules govern tense usage in scientific articles?” English for Specific Purposes, 6. 31-44, 1987.
[24]	Salager-Meyer, F, “Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse,” English for Specific Purposes, 13. 149-170. 1994.
[25]	Hyland, K., Hedging in scientific research articles, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1998.
[26]	Skelton, J, “The care and maintenance of edges.” ELT Journal, 42 (1). 37-43. 1988.
[27]	Samraj, B. “A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introduction”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7: 55-67. 2008.
[28]	Hyland, K. “Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation. Language teaching, 46(1). 53-70. 2013.
[29]	Mason, O., & Pennington, M.C. “Semi-automated analysis of a thesis”. Writing & Pedagogy. 1(2). 303-326. 2009.
[30]	Ivanič, R. Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1998.
[31]	Harwood, N. & G. Hadley, “Demystifying institutional practices: Critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing,” English for Specific Purposes, 21(4). 355-77. 2004.
[32]	Harwood, N, “We do not seem to have a theory … The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing,” Applied linguistics, 26(3). 343-375. 2005.