Leadership and Competence Development in Higher Education: Reconstituting the Human – Machine Interfaces in the Space of Digital Systems

Milan Jaros^1,

¹Philosophical Studies, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom

Cite this paper:
Milan Jaros. Leadership and Competence Development in Higher Education: Reconstituting the Human – Machine Interfaces in the Space of Digital Systems. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(10):898-905. doi: 10.12691/education-2-10-8

Abstract

It is an outstanding intellectual and leadership challenge in higher education to develop effective ‘competence’ delivery and evaluation practices complementary to and building upon the traditional programs. The key obstacle is the growing generic gap between systems of thought and organization governing the established curriculum and those required for decision making conditioned by the radical changes in the divisions of labor. It is argued that this decision making takes place in an open problem space in which success depends on being able to recognize and make use of the pathways imposed upon us by digitalization of knowledge systems and work practices. These are the highways along which the current thoughts and material exchanges travel and collide, and which condition the much needed synergy of inputs spanning disparate knowledge and power systems. Two aspects of this structural problem are of particular interest here. Firstly, the boundary separating human and machinic contributions have become blurred beyond repair. Secondly, the failure to recognise fully the impact of new work practices amounts to de facto abdication by humans from taming runaway complexification. This rapidly reduces the space in which to make efforts required to ensure that the human condition - and the standing of higher education as a guardian of the consititutive role of human –human engagenment in particular - remain open for debate and perpetual re-positioning in rapidly changing circumstances. The aim here is to establish pedagogy for a fresh re-appraisal of this constitutive process in the liminal space of human and machinic contributions, and one capable of engendering the human-centered character of University without depriving staff and students of benefits brought by the maturing post-mechanical culture.

Keywords:
leadership and methodology in higher education competence development and evaluation human-centred pedagogy in the space of digital systems interdisciplinarity

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Jaros, M., “Leadership and Methodology Challenges in Higher Education: Developing Competence in the Digital Age”, Global Education Review 2, 64-89, 2014.
[2]	Luhmann, N., Social Systems, transl. Bednarz, J. Jr. and Baecker, D., Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1995.
[3]	Sornette, D. (2003). Why Stock Markets Crash. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003.
[4]	Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R., Nudge. Yale University Press, Yale, 2008.
[5]	Instructive and accessible examples, from low to high levels of sophistication, can be found in Kelly, K., Out of Control, Fourth Estate, London, 1994, Lovink, G., Ed. Uncanny Networks. Cambridge: MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004, Crary, J., Kwinter, S., Eds., Incorporations, MIT Zone, New York, 1992, Pearson, K.A., Viroid Life, Routledge, London, 1997, Raunig, G. A Thousand Machines, Semiotext(e) (Intervention Series 5), Los Angeles, 2010.
[6]	Lyotard, J-F., The Postmodern Condition, trans. G.Bennington, G., Massumi, B., Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1986.
[7]	Standish, P., “Heidegger and the Technology of Further Education”, J. Philos. of Education of Great Britain 31, 439-460, 1997.
[8]	Zizek, S., First as Tragedy, Then as Farce, Verso, London, 2009
[9]	Mirowski, P., Never Let a Serious Crisis Go To Waste, Verso, London, 2013.
[10]	Blömeke, S., Zlatkin-Troitchanskaia, O., & Fege, J., Eds., Modeling and Measuring Competences in Higher Education, Sensepublishers, Rotterdam, 2013.
[11]	Shavelson, R.J., “An Approach to Testing & Modelling Competence”, in Blömeke at. al., Eds., Modeling and Measuring Competences in Higher Education, Sensepublishers, Rotterdam, 2013, 29-44.
[12]	Inns, T., Ed.,Designing for the 21st century, Glover, London, 2010.
[13]	Castells, M., The Rise of the Networked Society, Blackwell, London, 2000.
[14]	Harvey, D., The Enigma of Capital, Profile Books, London, 2010.
[15]	Westra, R., The Evil Axis of Finance, Clarity Press Inc., Atlanta, 2010.
[16]	ref. 10, p.1.
[17]	Wilson, A., Knowledge Power: Interdisciplinary Education for a Complex World, Routledge, London, 2010, 114.
[18]	Grafton, A.T., “Can the College be Saved?”, The New York Review of Books LIX, 22-24, May 22, 2012.
[19]	Ryan, A., “One Virtue at a Time, Please”, The New York Review of Books LIX, 54-55, June 21, 2012.
[20]	Bromwich, D., “The High-Tech Mess of Higher Education”, The New York Review of Books, LXI, 50-52, August 14, 2014.
[21]	Palmer, J.A. (Ed.), Fifty Modern Thinkers in Education, Routledge, Oxford, 2001.
[22]	Blömeke, S., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Eds., Modeling and Measuring Competences in Higher Education: 23 research projects on engineering, economics and social sciences, education and generic skills of higher education students, KoKoHs Papers 3, www.kompetenzen-im-hochschulsektor.de, November 2013.
[23]	Benjamin, W., The Arcades Project, transl. Eiland, H., McLoughlin, K., Harvard, Cambridge, Mass., 1999.
[24]	Buck-Morss, S., The Dialectics of Seeing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1989.
[25]	Hanssen, B., Walter Benjamin’s Other History, University of California Press, London, 2000.
[26]	Jaros, M., Deakin-Crick, R., “Personalised Learning for the Post-Mechanical Age”, Journal of Curriculum Studies 39, 423-440, 2007.
[27]	Jaros, M., “Towards Re-definition of Space-ness in the Post-mechanical Age: Methodological Notes”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 84-89, 2007.
[28]	Eshun, K., “Everything Was To Be Done. All Adventures Are Still There.” In Lovink, G., Ed., Uncanny Networks, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2004, 348-359.
[29]	Smith, B.C., On the Origin of Objects, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996, 36.
[30]	Morris, I., Why the West Rules – For Now, Farrah, Strauss and Giroux, New York, 2010.
[31]	Fuller, S., “Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies”, in Science as Practice and Culture, Pickering, A., Ed., Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1992, 390-428.
[32]	Fukuyama, F., The End of History and The Last Man, Avon Books, New York, 1992.