School-University Collaboration Initiative: Benefits and Challenges in Uganda

Charles Opolot-Okurut^1, and Juliana Bbuye²

¹Department of Science, Technical and Vocational Education, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

²Department of Distance and Lifelong Learning, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

Cite this paper:
Charles Opolot-Okurut and Juliana Bbuye. School-University Collaboration Initiative: Benefits and Challenges in Uganda. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(10):843-849. doi: 10.12691/education-2-10-1

Abstract

This investigation examined academic staff, school administrators and school teachers’ perceptions of the university-school collaboration. A qualitative research paradigm was followed through a case study of Makerere University’s use of Teacher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa-(TESSA) project materials. The case study focused on gaining a wealth of detailed information on a small sample of academic staff, school administrators, and school teachers while addressing the research questions of the study. Twelve participants were used for data collection from the university (three) and the primary schools (nine). Data were collected using semi-structured interviews organized around the key research questions. Results indicated that the gap between university academics and school teachers is narrowing. Some school teachers have changed their practices that appear to have improved their methods of delivery of content to the learners. The use of TESSA materials is altering teachers’ teaching practices. But, the resources for university-school collaboration are varied and expensive. Teachers’ workload appears to leave them little time to be effectively involved in collaborative activities. Conclusions from these findings were that there are both merits and constraints to university school partnership to the advantage of each institution; teachers are incorporating TESSA materials into their teaching practices. The implications of these findings for the university-school partnership include the increased need for university and school administrators to support school teachers benefit from the collaboration; and to create more time for the involvement of all participating parties so that they can better implement the collaboration activities.

Keywords:
collaboration partnership schools teacher education Uganda university

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Broadbent, C. and Brady, J., Leading change in teacher education in Australia through university-school partnerships. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences (eISSN: 2301-2218). 687-703. 2013.
[2]	Gray, B., Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems, Jossey-Bass, London, 1998.
[3]	Clarken, R. H. University/school collaboration: A case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Washington, DC, 1999.
[4]	Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F. and Cherednichenko, B., Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals, Victoria University, Canberra, 2009.
[5]	Arsenault, J., Forging nonprofit alliances, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1998.
[6]	Clarken, R. H. Toward more effective education through university and school collaboration. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, 2001.
[7]	Wasonga, C. O., Rari, B. O. and Wanzare, Z. O. (2011). Re-thinking school-university collaboration: Agenda for the 21st century. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(22). 1036-1045. 2011
[8]	Whyte, A. and Ellis, N., The power of a network organization: A model for school-university collaboration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(2). 137-151. 2004.
[9]	Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Marrison, K., Research methods in education, (6th edn.). Taylor & Francis, London, 2007. [E-Book] Available netLibrary e-Library.
[10]	Patton, M.Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods, (3rd edn.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.
[11]	Merriam, S. B., Qualitative research and case study applications in education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1998.
[12]	Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, 1990.
[13]	Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 428-444, 1994.
[14]	Martin, J., Tett, L. and Kay, H., Developing collaborative partnerships: Limits and possibilities for schools, parents, and community education. International Studies in Sociology of education, 9(1). 59-75. 1999.
[15]	Konecki, L. PDS professor/coordinators and their practices: Beliefs emerging from critical incidents journaling. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. 1998, April.