American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2025, 13(10), 474-484
DOI: 10.12691/education-13-10-5
Open AccessArticle

Mediating Role of Self-Esteem in the Relationship Between Teacher Pedagogical Practices and Student English Language Proficiency

Eunice S. Villegas1 and Joel D. Potane1,

1Graduate School, Capitol University, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Pub. Date: November 10, 2025

Cite this paper:
Eunice S. Villegas and Joel D. Potane. Mediating Role of Self-Esteem in the Relationship Between Teacher Pedagogical Practices and Student English Language Proficiency. American Journal of Educational Research. 2025; 13(10):474-484. doi: 10.12691/education-13-10-5

Abstract

This study examined the role of students’ self-esteem as a mediating variable in the relationship between Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices (TPP) and English Language Proficiency (ELP), and whether demographic profiles influence the strength or direction of this relationship. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from 270 students enrolled in English-related programs at selected higher education institutions in Misamis Oriental during Academic Year 2024–2025. Validated survey tools and a standardized English proficiency test were used, with statistical analyses including descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, multiple regression, mediation, and moderation. Results showed that most respondents were female, single, and aged 18 to 20. Teachers' Pedagogical Practices (TPP) were reported as highly practiced, and students exhibited high levels of self-esteem; however, their English Language Proficiency was low. Regression analysis indicated that neither Teachers' Pedagogical Practices (p = 0.635) nor self-esteem (p = 0.177) significantly predicted students' English Language Proficiency. However, pedagogical practices significantly influenced students’ self-esteem (β = .211, p < .000). Mediation analysis revealed that self-esteem did not mediate the relationship between pedagogical practices and English Language Proficiency (indirect effect = -0.006, p = .266). Likewise, the moderating variables; age, sex, and civil status, did not significantly moderate the relationship (p > .05 for all interaction terms). The study concludes that although Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices enhance students’ self-esteem, they did not significantly predict or mediate improvements in English Language Proficiency. Thus, there is a need to create holistic instructional strategies and policies that address factors beyond pedagogy and psychological aspects.

Keywords:
English Language Proficiency (ELP) Pedagogical Practices Self-Esteem Mediation Analysis Moderation Analysis

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Alamer, A., & Lee, J. (2021). A motivational process model explaining the L2 achievement of Saudi EFL learners. System, 99, 102496.
 
[2]  Matsumoto, D., & Ando, H. (2020). The relationship between English language proficiency, self-confidence, and academic performance. Journal of Language and Education, 34(2), 58–72.
 
[3]  Grabe, W., & Yamashita, J. (2022). Reading and syntactic knowledge: The role of vocabulary and grammar in English language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 98–113.
 
[4]  Oktaviani, L. (2022). An analysis of students’ English proficiency test results: A focus on grammar, syntax, listening, and reading components. English Language Teaching Educational Journal (ELTEJ), 3(2), 89–97.
 
[5]  OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
 
[6]  Education First. (2022). EF English Proficiency Index: A ranking of 111 countries and regions by English skills. https:// www.ef.com/wwen/epi/.
 
[7]  Professional Regulation Commission. (2021–2024). Licensure examination for teachers (LET) results. https://www.prc.gov.ph. [Accessed: 04.20.2025].
 
[8]  The Summit Express. (2022 – 2024). LET result: Performance of secondary_schools. https:// www.thesummitexpress.com/ 2022/11/ october-2022-let-result-performance-of-schools-secondary.html. https:// www.thesummitexpress.com/2023/11/september-2023-let-result-performance-of-schools-secondary.html. https:// www. thesummitexpress.com/ 2024/11/ september-2024-let-result-performance-of-schools-secondary.html .[Accessed: 04.15.2025].
 
[9]  Martinez, L., & Sanz, I. (2021). Impact of learner-centered and project-based approaches on language acquisition. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 456–468.
 
[10]  Zhao, L. (2023). Self-esteem and academic success: The mediating role of teacher support and student engagement. Teaching and Teacher_Education,_92,_103087.
 
[11]  MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2023). The role of affective factors in second language learning: Implications for pedagogy and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research,_27(1),_42–58.
 
[12]  Chacón, C. T. (2021). Self-esteem and foreign language learning: The mediating role of task self-efficacy. International Journal of Language_Studies,15(2),_1-20. https:// www.ijls.net/ 2018 /vol15num2.html.
 
[13]  Serquina, A. (2021). Demographic and psychological factors affecting English proficiency among ESL students. International Journal of English Language Studies, 9(2), 45–60.
 
[14]  Gultom, A. (2021). The correlation between students’ self-esteem and their English proficiency test result. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning - Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, 2(2), 111-122.
 
[15]  Utami, D. (2022). Does self-esteem influence student English proficiency test scores?. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning - Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, 3(1), 18-27.
 
[16]  Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. https://books.google.com/books/about/Social_Foundations_of_Thought_and_Actio.html?id=HJ7wAAAAMAAJ.
 
[17]  Bhandari, P. (2021). Descriptive-correlational design in research: Measuring variable associations and making informed predictions. International Journal of Research Methods, 12(3), 157–169.
 
[18]  Arbaoui, K. (2023). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ pedagogical practices in language learning. International Journal of Language and Education Studies, 12(3), 45–60.
 
[19]  Puangpunsi, N. (2021). Project-based learning in English language classrooms: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 9(2), 88–95. Silpakorn University. https:// files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ1304647.pdf. [Accessed: 03.10.2025].
 
[20]  García, J. A. (2019). Self-esteem levels vs global scores on the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Heliyon. Volume 5, Issue 3.
 
[21]  General Test of English Language Proficiency. G-TELP Level Test. https://www.g-telp.com/take/practice/glt. Accessed: 02.19.2025].
 
[22]  Dalawi, et al. (2023). Development of the Malay language of understanding, attitude, practice and health literacy questionnaire on COVID-19 (MUAPHQ C-19): content validity & face validity analysis. National Library of Medicine. PMC PubMED Central. PMCID: PMC10262113. https:// pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ articles/ PMC10262113/.
 
[23]  Yusoff MSB. (2019). ABC of response process validation and face validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal. 2019; 11(3): 55–61.
 
[24]  Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2021). Exploring the role of teaching strategies in promoting communicative competence among ESL learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12(1), 3–17.
 
[25]  Bernardo, A. B. I., & Estrellado, A. F. (2022). Academic Reading and Comprehension Challenges in Philippine Higher Education. Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(1), 213-229.
 
[26]  Lim, J., & Lee, M. (2019). The role of direct instruction and formative assessment in promoting learner achievement. TESOL Journal, 10(3), e00423.
 
[27]  Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Collective teacher culture: exploring an elusive construct and its relations with teacher autonomy, belonging, and job satisfaction. Educational Studies, 47(3), 268–281.
 
[28]  San Juan, R. (2019, December 3). The Philippines is lowest in reading comprehension among 79 countries.—Philstar--Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2019/12/03/1974002/philippines-lowest-reading-comprehension-among-79-countries
 
[29]  Chua, B. L., & Lin, L. H. (2020). English language learning in Southeast Asia: Current trends and challenges. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 8(1), 34–42.
 
[30]  Apiles, V. F. (2025). Building reading classrooms: Insights from educational service contracting schools in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies. Vol 6 (1). https:// philarchive.org/ archive/ APIBRC.
 
[31]  Majeed, S., & Memon, S. (2022). Integrating task-based learning and content-enriched instruction to enhance students' engagement and language proficiency. Journal of Language and Education, 36(2), 134-150.
 
[32]  Vasylyeva, N. (2024). Semilinear multi-term fractional in time diffusion with memory. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics.
 
[33]  Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (2020). Introduction: Language teacher education – a complex, dynamic and situated endeavor. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language teacher education (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
 
[34]  Chen, C. M., & Chiu, C. H. (2021). An empirical study of the effects of a digital game-based learning system on students' learning achievement and self-confidence in English vocabulary learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 26–37.
 
[35]  Mamaril, M. J. N., Sandoval, R. E., & Gomez, M. B. (2020). Project-based learning: Its impact on self-esteem and performance of students in technology and livelihood education. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 1(1), 16–29.
 
[36]  Dewaele, J. M., & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 347–365.
 
[37]  Manalastas, A. K. M., & Batang, B. L. (2024). Factors influencing the English language competency of Filipino university students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(6), 2671–2673.
 
[38]  Wang, J., & Zhang, L. (2021). The interaction of affective, cognitive, and contextual factors in language learning: A complex approach to understanding self-esteem's role. Language Learning Research Journal, 28(2), 154–169.
 
[39]  Gao, X., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). Investigating the role of learner self-esteem and classroom engagement in second language proficiency. System, 113, 102945.
 
[40]  Dabbagh, N., & Fakhrpour, A. (2020). Gender-neutral pedagogical effectiveness in language learning: The role of inclusive teaching methods. International Journal of Educational Research, 58(4), 315–330.
 
[41]  Cabanlit, R. G. (2022). Gender differences in academic performance: The impact of technological and project-based methods in Philippine higher education. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 45–58.
 
[42]  Ortega, L. M., & Chavez, D. A. (2022). Age-related adaptability in technology-mediated and task-based learning environments: A study of adolescent and early adult learners. Journal of Educational Technology and Pedagogy, 29(3), 202–216.
 
[43]  Demir, S., & Arslan, H. (2021). The role of demographic factors in academic performance: A focus on age, gender, and civil status. Educational Studies and Research Journal, 34(1), 78–92.
 
[44]  Villanueva, G. T., & Salazar, L. J. (2020). Gender differences in English language learning motivation: A study of college students in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 7(1), 45–52.
 
[45]  Lin, Y., Chen, M., & Huang, J. (2020). The impact of pedagogical approaches on student achievement across diverse demographics. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(3), 112–124.