American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2024, 12(2), 59-69
DOI: 10.12691/education-12-2-6
Open AccessArticle

Impact of Student Generated Exam Aids on Academic Performance, Stress and Learning Approach

Israa Ihab1, Elaina B.K. Brendel1, Camille Law1, Kelsey Van1, Jamie L.A. Martin1 and Jennifer M. Monk1,

1Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

Pub. Date: February 22, 2024

Cite this paper:
Israa Ihab, Elaina B.K. Brendel, Camille Law, Kelsey Van, Jamie L.A. Martin and Jennifer M. Monk. Impact of Student Generated Exam Aids on Academic Performance, Stress and Learning Approach. American Journal of Educational Research. 2024; 12(2):59-69. doi: 10.12691/education-12-2-6

Abstract

The permitted use of exam aids has the capacity to decrease examination stress and positively impact student learning and academic performance. The purpose of this study was to develop an exam aid assessment rubric to evaluate the inclusion of critical organization and course content integrative elements included on single page student-generated exam aids. The exam aids were used as both a learning and examination preparation tool that were also used as a supportive aid during the final exam of a fourth-year nutrition and disease pathophysiology course. Student-generated exam aids (n=167) were assessed according to two rubrics for exam aid assessment scores, namely the exam aid general score and exam aid content integration score developed by the research team. Subsequently, the relationship between students’ exam aid assessment scores and academic performance (e.g., final exam grade, final grade in the course), learning approach (namely deep and surface approaches, motives, and strategies) and perceived stress scale (PSS) scores were determined using online survey data collected at the end of the academic semester prior to the final exam. Higher exam aid assessment scores were positively correlated with higher academic performance outcomes, including both final exam grade and overall final grade in the course (P<0.05). Students’ surface learning approach scores and surface learning motive scores were both inversely correlated with their exam aid content integration score (P<0.05), whereas PSS scores were negatively correlated with final grade, exam aid general score, and exam aid content integration score (P<0.05). Conversely, PSS scores were positively correlated with surface learning approach and surface learning motive scores (P<0.05). This demonstrates the negative impact of stress on academic performance and engagement in examination preparation activities and learning approach. Collectively, this study demonstrates the positive impact of student-generated exam aids but highlights that their potential benefits to support student learning and academic performance is limited in students still experiencing higher stress levels and/or surface learning approaches.

Keywords:
exam aid student stress anxiety learning approach academic performance rubric

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  May RW, Casazza SP. Academic Major as a Perceived Stress Indicator: Extending Stress Management Intervention. College Student Journal. (2012); 46(2): 264–73.
 
[2]  Reisberg L. Student stress is rising, especially among young women. Chronicle of Higher Education. (2000); 46(21): 49–50.
 
[3]  Misra R, McKean M, West S, Russo T. Academic stress of college students: Comparison of student and faculty perceptions. College student journal. (2000); 34(2): 236–45.
 
[4]  Abouserie R. Sources and Levels of Stress in Relation to Locus of Control and Self Esteem in University Students. Educational Psychology. (1994); 14(3): 323–30.
 
[5]  Hembree R. Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test Anxiety. Review of Educational Research. (1988); 58(1): 47–77.
 
[6]  Imose R, Barber LK. Using undergraduate grade point average as a selection tool: A synthesis of the literature. Psychologist-Manager Journal. (2015); 18(1): 1–11. 10.1037/mgr0000025.
 
[7]  Vogelweid CM, Kitchel T, Rice AH. Veterinary Students’ Use of Crib Sheets in Preparing for Learning and Reducing Stress. NACTA Journal. (2014); 58(14): 137–41.
 
[8]  Krispenz A, Dickhäuser O. Effects of an inquiry-based short intervention on state test anxiety in comparison to alternative coping strategies. Frontiers in Psychology. (2018); 9(FEB): 201.
 
[9]  Hyseni Duraku Z, Hoxha L. Self-esteem, study skills, self-concept, social support, psychological distress, and coping mechanism effects on test anxiety and academic performance. Health Psychology Open. (2018); 5(2).
 
[10]  Yıldırım FB, Demir A, Barutçu F. Education and School Psychology Self-Handicapping Among University Students: The Role of Procrastination, Test Anxiety, Self-Esteem, and Self-Compassion. Psychological Reports. (2020); 123(3): 825–43.
 
[11]  Monk J, M. Beauchamp D, K. von Holt R, Van K. Effectiveness of Literature Critique Peer Discussions to Build Scientific Literacy Skills, Engagement and Improve Learning-Related Emotions during COVID-19-Associated Online Learning. American Journal of Educational Research. (2023); 11(5): 303–15.
 
[12]  Barrows J, Dunn S, A. Lloyd C. Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and College Exam Grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research. (2013); 1(3): 204–8.
 
[13]  Chapell MS, Benjamin Blanding Z, Takahashi M, Silverstein ME, Newman B, Gubi A, et al. Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology. (2005); 97(2): 268–74.
 
[14]  England BJ, Brigati JR, Schussler EE. Student anxiety in introductory biology classrooms: Perceptions about active learning and persistence in the major. PLoS ONE. (2017); 12(8): 1–17.
 
[15]  Gloria CT, Steinhardt MA. Relationships among Positive Emotions, Coping, Resilience and Mental Health. Stress and Health. (2016); 32(2): 145–56.
 
[16]  Kahu ER, Nelson K. Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development. (2018); 37(1): 58–71. 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
 
[17]  Hancock DR. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without. The Journal of Educational Research. (2001); 94(5): 284–90.
 
[18]  Rogowska AM, Kusnierz C, Bokszczanin A. Intensity of physical activity and depressive symptoms in college students: Fitness improvement tactics in youth (fityou) project. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. (2020); 13: 797–811.
 
[19]  Hamouda S, Shaffer CA. Crib sheets and exam performance in a data structures course. Computer Science Education. (2016); 26(1): 1–26. 10.1080/08993408.2016.1140427
 
[20]  Dickson KL, Bauer JJ. Do Students Learn Course Material during Crib Sheet Construction? Teaching of Psychology. (2008); 35(2): 117–20.
 
[21]  Drake VK, Freed P, Hunter JM. Crib sheets or security blankets? Issues in Mental Health Nursing. (1998); 9(3): 291–300.
 
[22]  Johanns B, Dinkens A, Moore J. A systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: Evaluating effects on development of critical thinking skills. Nurse Education in Practice. (2017); 27: 89–94. 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.018.
 
[23]  Yu B, Tsiknis G, Allen M. Turning exams into a learning experience. SIGCSE’10 - Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 2010. p. 336–40.
 
[24]  Rice AH, Vogelweid CM, Kitchel T. The Influence of Crib Sheets on Veterinary Students Exam Performance, Perceived Stress, and Retention of Subject Matter Knowledge. NACTA Journal. (2017); 61(1): 66–72.
 
[25]  Nsor-Ambala R. Impact of exam type on exam scores, anxiety, and knowledge retention in a cost and management accounting course. Accounting Education. (2020); 29(1):32–56. 10.1080/09639284.2019.1683871.
 
[26]  Feldhusen JF. An evaluation of college students’ reactions to open book examinations. Educational and Psychological Measurement. (1961); 21(3): 637–46.
 
[27]  Naveh-Benjamin M, McKeachie WJ, Lin Y guang, Holinger DP. Test anxiety: Deficits in information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology. (1981); 73(6): 816–24.
 
[28]  Weimer M. Crib sheets help students prioritize and organize course content. The Teaching Professor Blog. (2013).
 
[29]  Tussing L. A consideration of the open book examination. Educational and Psychological Measurement. (1951); 11(4): 597–602.
 
[30]  Hindman CD. Crib notes in the classroom: Cheaters never win. Teaching of Psychology. (1980); 7(3): 166–8.
 
[31]  Erbe B. Reducing Test Anxiety While Increasing Learning: The Cheat Sheet. College Teaching. (2007); 55(3): 96–8.
 
[32]  Oliveira AW, Brown AO, Day K, Saviolli R, Campbell SJ, Potkins H, et al. Authorised cheat sheets in undergraduate biology: Using pictographic organisers to foster student creative cognition. Review of Education. (2022); 10(3): 1–26.
 
[33]  Danielian SA, Buswell NT. Do support sheets actually support students? A content analysis of student support sheets for exams. American Society for Engineering Education. (2019).
 
[34]  Yamarik S. Does cooperative learning improve student learning outcomes? Journal of Economic Education. (2007); 38(3): 259–77.
 
[35]  De Raadt M. Student created cheat-sheets in examinations: Impact on student outcomes. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series. (2012); 123: 71–6.
 
[36]  Dorsel TN, Cundiff GW. The cheat-sheet: Efficient coding device or indispensable crutch? Journal of Experimental Education. (1979); 48(1): 39–42.
 
[37]  Gharib A, Philips W, Mathews N. Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety. Journal of Psychology Research. (2012); 2(8): 469–78.
 
[38]  Cannonier C, Smith K. Do crib sheets improve student performance on tests? Evidence from principles of economics. International Review of Economics Education. (2019); 30(August 2018): 100147. 10.1016/j.iree.2018.08.003.
 
[39]  Dickson L, Miller M. Effect of Crib Card Construction and Use on Exam Performance. Teaching of Psychology. (2006); 33(1): 39–40.
 
[40]  Whitley BEJ. Does “cheating” help? The effect of using authorized crib notes during examinations. College Student Journal. (1996); 30(4): 489–93.
 
[41]  Burns KC. Security Blanket or Crutch? Crib Card Usage Depends on Students’ Abilities. Teaching of Psychology. (2014); 41(1): 66–8.
 
[42]  Eysink THS, de Jong T. Does Instructional Approach Matter? How Elaboration Plays a Crucial Role in Multimedia Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. (2012); 21(4): 583–625. 10.1080/10508406.2011.611776.
 
[43]  Tripto J, Ben-Zvi Assaraf O, Snapir Z, Amit M. The ‘What is a system’ reflection interview as a knowledge integration activity for high school students’ understanding of complex systems in human biology. International Journal of Science Education. (2016); 38(4): 564–95. 10.1080/09500693.2016.1150620.
 
[44]  Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DYP. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology. (2001); 71: 133–49.
 
[45]  Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. (1983); 24(4): 385–96.
 
[46]  Bieleke M, Gogol K, Goetz T, Daniels L, Pekrun R. The AEQ-S: A Short Version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire. Contemporary Educational Psychology. (2020); 65: 101940.
 
[47]  Van K, Beauchamp DM, Rachid H, Mansour M, Buckley B, Choi D, et al. Impact of the COVID-19-induced shift to online dietetics training on PDEP competency acquisition and mental health. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research. (2022); 83(3): 144–6.
 
[48]  Beauchamp DM, Monk JM. Effect of Optional Assessments on Student Engagement, Learning Approach, Stress, and Perceptions of Online Learning during COVID-19. International Journal of Higher Education. (2022); 11(5): 87.
 
[49]  Teoh HC, Abdullah MC, Roslan S, Daud SM. Assessing students approaches to learning using a matrix framework in a Malaysian public university. SpringerPlus. (2014); 3(54): 1–11.
 
[50]  Rowe AD, Fitness J, Wood LN. University student and lecturer perceptions of positive emotions in learning. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. (2015); 28(1): 1–20. 10.1080/09518398.2013.847506.
 
[51]  Brubacher MR, Silinda FT. Enjoyment and Not Competence Predicts Academic Persistence for Distance Education Students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. (2019); 20(3).
 
[52]  Villavicencio FT, Bernardo ABI. Beyond Math Anxiety: Positive Emotions Predict Mathematics Achievement, Self-Regulation, and Self-Efficacy. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. (2016); 25(3): 415–22.
 
[53]  De La Fuente J, López-García M, Mariano-Vera M, Martínez-Vicente JM, Zapata L. Personal self-regulation, learning approaches, resilience and test anxiety in psychology students. Estudios Sobre Educacion. (2017); 32: 9–26.
 
[54]  Rozgonjuk D, Kraav T, Mikkor K, Orav-Puurand K, Täht K. Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning. International Journal of STEM Education. (2020); 7(46).
 
[55]  Putwain D, Sander P, Larkin D. Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology. (2013); 83(4): 633–50.
 
[56]  Larwin, K. H., Gorman, J., & Larwin, D. A. Assessing the Impact of Testing Aids on Post-Secondary Student Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Educational Psychology Review. (2013); 25(3): 429–443.
 
[57]  Wachsman, Y. , AccessEcon. (2002); 1(1): 1-11.
 
[58]  Yang Song, & Thuente, D. A quantitative case study in engineering of the efficacy of quality cheat-sheets. 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). (2015); 1–7.
 
[59]  Colthorpe, K., Gray, H., Ainscough, L., & Ernst, H. Drivers for authenticity: student approaches and responses to an authentic assessment task. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. (2021); 46(7)995–1007.
 
[60]  Salamonson, Y., Weaver, R., Chang, S., Koch, J., Bhathal, R., Khoo, C., & Wilson, I. (2013). Learning approaches as predictors of academic performance in first year health and science students. Nurse Education Today. (2013); 33(7): 729–733.
 
[61]  Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. Teaching to the Test...or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding. Educational Psychology Review. (2014); 26(2): 307–329.
 
[62]  Ozer, S. A convergent parallel mixed-method research into the use of the cheat sheet in teacher education: State test anxiety, exam scores and opinions of prospective teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (2021); 20(3): 101-113.
 
[63]  Ringeisen, T., Lichtenfeld, S., Becker, S., & Minkley, N. Stress experience and performance during an oral exam: the role of self-efficacy, threat appraisals, anxiety, and cortisol. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping. (2019); 32(1): 50–66.
 
[64]  Leblanc, V.R., Bandiera, G.W. The effects of exam stress on the performance of emergency medicine residents. Medical Education. (2007); 41(6): 556-564.
 
[65]  Roome, T. & Soan, C. A. GCSE exam stress: student perceptions of the effects on wellbeing and performance. Pastoral Care in Education. (2019); 37(4): 297-315.
 
[66]  Ng, V., Koh, D., & Chia, S.-E. Examination Stress, Salivary Cortisol, and Academic Performance. Psychological Reports. (2003); 93(3 suppl): 1133-1134.