Critical Perspectives, Theoretical Foundations, Practical Teaching, Technology Integration, Assessment and Feedback, and Hands-on Practices in Science Education

Krisel M. Anoling^1, , Charmaine Ruth G. Abella², Peter Paul S. Cagatao³ and Romiro G. Bautista⁴

¹Records Office, Isabela State University-Jones Campus, Jones, Isabela, Philippines

²College of Teacher Education, Quirino State University-Maddela Campus, Maddela, Quirino, Philippines

³Dean, Graduate School, University of La Salette, Inc., Santiago City, Philippines

⁴International Relations Officer, Quirino State University-Main Campus, Diffun, Quirino, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Krisel M. Anoling, Charmaine Ruth G. Abella, Peter Paul S. Cagatao and Romiro G. Bautista. Critical Perspectives, Theoretical Foundations, Practical Teaching, Technology Integration, Assessment and Feedback, and Hands-on Practices in Science Education. American Journal of Educational Research. 2024; 12(1):20-27. doi: 10.12691/education-12-1-3

Abstract

Hands-on practices in science education are underscored in a constructivist lens, advocating for experiential learning and direct engagement with scientific concepts. This study aimed to determine the critical perspectives, theoretical foundations, practical teaching, technology integration, assessment and feedback, and hands-on practices in science education as evaluated by the science teachers in the basic and higher education. The Descriptive-Comparative Research design was employed since the study aimed at assessing the thesis as it occurs in its locale without manipulating any variable. The findings revealed a widespread consensus among respondents across various aspects of science education, suggesting promising opportunities for employment and seamless integration throughout different educational tiers. Both males and females generally aligned on critical perspectives, practical teaching methods, and technology integration. However, divergence surfaced in theoretical foundations, assessment, and hands-on practices, showcasing a proficiency gap where female teachers excel. While overall agreement existed among teachers regarding critical aspects of science education, disparities in practical teaching methods persisted among elementary, secondary, and tertiary educators. Respondents from various educational levels showcased uniformity, yet those holding Bachelor's degrees tended to express lower agreement compared to their counterparts with Master's or doctoral degrees. Notably, distinctive views emerged in technology utilization and practical teaching experiences in science education, particularly among Special Science Teachers and Teacher holders when contrasted with Master Teachers, Head Teachers, and Teacher-Educators. These differences emphasized the need for collaborative efforts to bridge gaps and enhance teaching methodologies in science education.

Keywords:
assessment educational technology hands-on science science education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Guerrero, JS., & Bautista, RG. (2023). Inquiry-based teaching in secondary science. International Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 8(2), 146-154.
[2]	Bagay, MC., Ursua, RRR., Abellera, MAA., Baldovino, RJG., Concepcion, RAP., Galapon, VS., & Bautista, RG. (2023). Problem-based learning in teaching science. Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 7-14.
[3]	Vallerio, ZV., Tobias, JCZ., Tillay, JN., Dumangeng, AP., Pumihic, VT., & Bautista, RG. (2023). Science teaching and learning conceptions towards teachers’ sense of efficacy. American Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 79-83.
[4]	Libao, NJP., Sagun, JJB., Tamangan, EA., Pattalitan, APP., Dupa, MED., & Bautista, RG. (2016). Science learning motivations as correlate of students’ academic performances. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(3), 209-218.
[5]	Legaspi, JME., Perhilliana, CO., Camayang, JG., Garingan, EG., Velasco, MKGT., Ursua, JC., & Bautista, RG. (2020). Scientific Learning Motivations as Predictors of Pre-service Elementary Grade Teachers’ Authentic Assessment Practices in Science. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 150-154.
[6]	Discipulo, LG., & Bautista, RG. (2022). Students’ cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies towards hands-on science. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(2), 658-664.
[7]	Ligado, FNG., Guray, ND., & Bautista, RG. (2022). Pedagogical beliefs, techniques, and practices towards hands-on science. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(10), 584-591.
[8]	Yang, I., Park, S., Shin, J., & Lim, S. (2017). Exploring Korean Middle School Students’ View about Scientific Inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3935-3958.
[9]	Karışan, D., Bilican, K., & Şenler, B. (2017). The Adaptation of the Views about Scientific Inquiry Questionnaire: A Validity and Reliability Study. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(1), 326-343.
[10]	Aragón, L.; Gómez-Chacón, B. Promoting Enquiry Skills in Trainee Teachers within the Context of the University Ecological Garden. Educ. Sci., 12, 214.
[11]	Baykara, H., & Yakar, Z., (2020). Preservice Science Teachers’ Views about Scientific Inquiry: The Case of Turkey and Taiwan. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 161-192.
[12]	Concannon, J. P., Brown, P. L., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2020). Investigating the development of secondary students’ views about scientific inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 906-933.
[13]	Gaigher, E., Hattingh, A., Lederman, J., & Lederman, N. (2022). Understandings About Scientific Inquiry in a South African School Prioritizing STEM. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 26(1), 13-23.
[14]	Gyllenpalm, J., Rundgren, C. J., Lederman, J., & Lederman N. (2022). Views About Scientific Inquiry: A Study of Students’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry in Grade 7 and 12 in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(2), 336-354.
[15]	Khishfe, R. (2017). Consistency of nature of science views across scientific and socio-scientific contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 403–432.
[16]	Bautista, RG. (2015). Online learning community: Is it a boon or a bane? QSU Research Journal, 4, 1-8.
[17]	Apostol, EMM., Apolonio, AM., Jose, BR., Garingan, EG., & Bautista, RG. (2016). Optimizing classroom instruction through online instructional delivery technique. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 302-306. DOI:10.12691/education-4-4-2
[18]	Bautista, RG. (2017). Welcome to my e-learning group. The efficacy of online scaffolding. Journal of Global Management, 37-45.
[19]	Kwon, H., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). Nurturing problem posing in young children: Using multiple representation within students’ real-world interest. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0648.
[20]	Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and Learning of Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Capacity through Systematic Research-Based Professional Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 737-762.
[21]	Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartels, S., and Jimenez, J. (2019). An international collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students' understandings of scientific inquiry: Establishing a baseline. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 486-515.
[22]	Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartels, S., Jimenez, J., Acosta, K., Akubo, M., Aly, S., Andrade, M. A. B. S. D., Atanasova, M., Blanquet, E., Blonder, R., Brown, P., Cardoso, R., Castillo-Urueta, P., Chaipidech, P., Concannon, J., Dogan, O. K., El-Deghaidy, H., Elzorkani, A., ... Wishart, J. (2021). International collaborative follow-up investigation of graduating high school students’ understandings of the nature of scientific inquiry: Is progress being made? International Journal of Science Education, 43(7), 991– 1016.
[23]	Özer, F., & Sarıbaş, D. (2023). Exploring Pre-service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Practices Through a Laboratory Course. Sci & Educ., 32, 787–820.
[24]	Ozturk, E. (2021). The effect of STEM activities on the scientific inquiry skills of pre-service primary school teachers. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 7(4), 296-308.
[25]	Penn, M. & Ramnarain, U.D. (2022). South African grade 12 science students’ understandings of scientific inquiry. Science and Education, 31, 635–656.
[26]	Šmida, D., Čipková, E., & Fuchs, M. (2023). Developing the test of inquiry skills: measuring the level of inquiry skills among pupils in Slovakia. International Journal of Science Education, 1-36.
[27]	Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: a systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 1-59.
[28]	Stylos, G., Christonasis, A., & Kotsis, K.T. (2023). Pre-service primary teachers’ views about scientific inquiry. International Journal of Studies in Education and Science, 4(2), 100-112.
[29]	TEMİZ, B. (2020). Assessing skills of identifying variables and formulating hypotheses using scenario-based multiple-choice questions. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 1-17.
[30]	Yakar, Z., & Baykara, H. (2014). Inquiry-Based Laboratory Practices in a Science Teacher Training Program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2).