Assessing the Impact of Algebra Tiles as Visual and Manipulative Aids on Students’ Algebraic Understanding

Haruna Abdul-Karim¹, Osman Kasimu^2, , Awal Adul Rahaman¹, Yaaba Samuel Kanimam¹, Majeed Imoro¹ and Mohammed Emmanuel Dokurugu³

¹Department of Mathematics and ICT, Gambaga College of Education, Gambaga, Ghana

²Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia

³Department of Mathematics and ICT, E.P. College of Education, Bimbilla, Ghana

Cite this paper:
Haruna Abdul-Karim, Osman Kasimu, Awal Adul Rahaman, Yaaba Samuel Kanimam, Majeed Imoro and Mohammed Emmanuel Dokurugu. Assessing the Impact of Algebra Tiles as Visual and Manipulative Aids on Students’ Algebraic Understanding. American Journal of Educational Research. 2023; 11(10):705-711. doi: 10.12691/education-11-10-9

Abstract

This action research study aims to explore the effectiveness of algebra tiles as a visual and manipulative tool in improving Junior High School students' understanding of algebraic concepts. The research was conducted over a period of six weeks and involved a total of 30 grade 7 students. The study utilized pre- and post-assessments of students' algebraic knowledge to record changes in students understanding of basic algebra. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 12 software was used for the data analysis, and the data were analysed using percentages and paired sample tests. The results revealed a significant enhancement in students’ algebra understanding and achievement (X=7.4667; p<0.05) after the intervention activity using algebra tiles. The Junior High School students exhibited a favorable perception of algebra tiles as tangible tools for mastering algebraic concepts. These findings emphasize the importance of mathematics educators improving their pedagogical knowledge in algebra instruction and incorporating visual and tactile aids like algebra tiles to foster a deeper understanding of abstract mathematical concepts.

Keywords:
action research algebra tiles algebraic understanding junior high school manipulative aid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Kasimu, O., and Imoro M. (2017) Students attitudes towards mathematics: the case of private and public Junior High Schools in the East Mamprusi District, Ghana. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(5), 38-43.
[2]	Star, J. R., Caronongan, P., Foegen, A., Furgeson, J., Keating, B., Larson, M. R., Lyskawa, J., McCallum, W. G., Porath, J., & Zbiek, R. M. (2015). Teaching strategies for improving algebra knowledge in middle and high school students. US Department of Education.
[3]	Osei, W., & Agyei, D m. D. (2023). Teaching knowledge and difficulties of In-field and Out-of-field Junior High School mathematics teachers in algebra. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2232240.
[4]	Wilmot, E. M. (2008). An investigation into the profile of Ghanaian high school mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching algebra and its relationship with students’ performance. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Michigan State University.
[5]	Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a Classroom Practice That Promotes Algebraic Reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034944.
[6]	Windsor, W. (2010). Algebraic thinking: A problem solving approach. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education (pp. 665- 672). MERGA.
[7]	Fletcher, J. A. (2008). Developing Algebraic Thinking Through Group Discussion Mathematics Connection, 7(3), 25‐34.
[8]	Wilmot, E. M., Yarkwah, C., & Abreh, M. K. (2018). Conceptualizing TEacher knowledge in domain spe-cific and measurable terms: validation of the expanded kat framework. British Journal of Education, 6(7), 31–48.
[9]	Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
[10]	WAEC. (2015). Chief Examiners’ report BECE Retrieved from http://www.waecgh.orgex aminers-report.
[11]	WAEC. (2017). Chief Examiners’ report BECE Retrieved from http://www.waecgh.orgex aminers -report.
[12]	WAEC. (2018). Chief Examiners’ report BECE Retrieved from http://www.waecgh.orgex aminers -report.
[13]	WAEC. (2020). Chief Examiners’ report BECE Retrieved from http://www.waecgh.orgex aminers -report.
[14]	Salifu, A. S. (2022). The Effects of Balance Model and Algebra Tiles Manipulative in Solving Linear Equations in One Variable. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(2), ep 22012.
[15]	Larbi, E., & Okyere, M. (2016). The use of manipulatives in mathematics education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(36), 53-61.
[16]	Heddens, J. W. (1997). Improving Mathematics Teaching by Using Manipulatives.
[17]	Satsangi, R., Bouck, E. C., Taber-Doughty, T., Bofferding, L., & Roberts, C. A. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 240-253.
[18]	National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
[19]	Kaput, J. (2008). What is Algebra? What is Algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher& M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 235-272). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[20]	Brahier, D. (2016). Teaching Secondary and Middle School Mathematics (5th ed.). Routledge.
[21]	Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. M. (2009). Teaching mathematics to middle school students with learning disabilities: Addressing the needs of a diverse student population. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 68-78.
[22]	Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390-419). Macmillan.
[23]	Ergene, B., & Haser C. (2021). Students’ algebra achievement, algebraic thinking and views in the case of using algebra tiles in groups. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi.
[24]	Bartolini, M. G., & Martignone, F. (2020). Manipulatives in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 487-494.
[25]	Sobol, M. Z. (1998). The effect of algebra tiles on student achievement in the factoring of quadratic trinomials. School Science and Mathematics, 98(1), 32-38.
[26]	Schoen, R. C., & Henny, R. A. (2003). The effect of the use of manipulatives on the mathematical achievement of students with disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(3), 150-159.
[27]	Elliott, J. (1991), Action Research for Educational Change, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
[28]	Gürbüz, R., & Toprak, Z. (2014). Designation, Implementation and Evaluation of Activities to Ensure Transition from Arithmetic to Algebra.
[29]	Uysal-Kog, O. & Baser, N. (2012). The role of visualization approach on students’ attitudes towards and achievements in mathematics. Elementary Education Online, 11(4), 945-957.
[30]	Saraswati, S. (2016). Supporting students’ understanding of linear equations with one variable using algebra tiles. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 19-30.