American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2022, 10(5), 282-287
DOI: 10.12691/education-10-5-3
Open AccessArticle

Integrity of Mathematics Classroom Assessment in the New Normal

Merly V. Pandan1, and Laila S. Lomibao2,

1Misamis Oriental General Comprehensive High School, Department of Education, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

2University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Lapasan Highway, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Pub. Date: May 07, 2022

Cite this paper:
Merly V. Pandan and Laila S. Lomibao. Integrity of Mathematics Classroom Assessment in the New Normal. American Journal of Educational Research. 2022; 10(5):282-287. doi: 10.12691/education-10-5-3

Abstract

All teachers and other stakeholders must be committed to evaluating students' learning in a genuine and honest manner. This study aimed to explore the teachers', students', parents', and school administrators’ perspectives on the integrity of mathematics classroom assessment in the new normal, as well as their experienced challenges and difficulties on the assessment of learning practices. A quantitative descriptive research design was undertaken in the study utilizing validated survey questionnaires. This was conducted to fourteen (14) Junior High Schools in the division of Misamis Oriental comprising large, medium, and small-sized secondary schools. Actual respondents of the study were 67 mathematics teachers; 1,481 G10 students; 1,037 G10 parents; and 24 school administrators. Descriptive statistics was used for the data processing. Analysis of the data revealed that under the new normal, teachers and parents’ perception on mathematics classroom assessment had a low level of integrity, whereas students and school administrators thought it had a high level of integrity. Parents believed that the majority of high school students do cheat. The findings suggested that the teachers' observations of low integrity were backed up by the parents' observations, as they are now the facilitators of learning at home. With regard to the experienced challenges and difficulties, the integrity of mathematics classroom assessment is a critical concern and a challenge for teachers, parents, and students. More research is needed to develop effective preventive measures to mitigate assessment dishonesty and to give a long-term alternative way to provide high-quality education especially during an emergency circumstance.

Keywords:
assessment integrity assessment challenges new normal distance learning cheating

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Lopez, S. R., Bruun, G. R., Mader, M. J., & Reardon, R. F. (2021). The Pandemic Pivot: The Impact of COVID-19 on Mathematics and Statistics Post-Secondary Educators. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education.
 
[2]  Gao, M. (2012). Classroom Assessments in Mathematics: High School Students’ Perceptions. International Journal of Business and Social Science.
 
[3]  Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2019). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education.
 
[4]  Clarke, M., & Luna-Bazaldua, D. (2021). Primer on Large-Scale Assessments of Educational Achievement. In Primer on Large-Scale Assessments of Educational Achievement.
 
[5]  ABS-CBN News, April 4, 2021. Gov’t urged to step up efforts vs ‘distance cheating’. https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/04/04/21/govt-urged-to-step-up-efforts-vs-distance-cheating
 
[6]  DepEd's Official Statement, September 22, 2021. On “Online Kopyahan”. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2021/09/22/on-online-kopyahan/
 
[7]  Mokdad, M., & Aljunaidi, S. (2020). Whither plagiarism in distance learning academic assessment during COVID-19? Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Learning, ICEL.
 
[8]  Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., et al. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: teachers’ perspectives. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x.pdf.
 
[9]  Proctortrack (article posted December 17, 2020). Preventing creative ways students cheat in an online exam. https://www.proctortrack.com/blog/article/preventing-creative-ways-students-cheat-in-an-online-exam/.
 
[10]  DiPietro, M. (2010). 14: Theoretical Frameworks for Academic Dishonesty. To Improve the Academy.
 
[11]  Rowland, A. (2007). “Descriptive Analysis of Georgia High School Teachers' Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty”. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 215. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/215.
 
[12]  Peled Y., Eshet Y., Barczyk C. & Grinautski K., (2018). Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among undergraduate students in online and face-to-face courses, Computers & Education.
 
[13]  Abante, A. S. (2021). A Comparative Analysis on the Challenges of Online Learning Modality and Modular Learning Modality: A Basis for Training Program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis.
 
[14]  Castroverde, F., & Acala, M. (2021). Modular distance learning modality: Challenges of teachers in teaching amid the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research Studies in Education.
 
[15]  Stone, T., Jawahar, I. M. & Kisamore, J. (2010): Predicting Academic Misconduct Intentions and Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Personality, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32: 1, 35-45.
 
[16]  Gardner, W. M., & Melvin, K. B. (1988). A scale for measuring attitude toward cheating. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society.
 
[17]  Bolin, A. U. (2004). Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied.
 
[18]  Hayes, A. (2021). Stratified Random Sampling. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/stratified_random_sampling.asp.
 
[19]  Pornel, J. B., & Saldaña, G. A. (2013). Four Common Misuses of the Likert Scale. Philippine Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities University of the Philippines Visayas.
 
[20]  Meccawy, Z., Meccawy, M., and Alsobhi, A. (2021). Assessment in ‘survival mode’: student and faculty perceptions of online assessment practices in HE during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity.