Availability of Manipulatives in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in Colleges of Education in Ghana

Evelyn Agyei^1, , Dennis Cornelius Agamah¹ and Gideon Entsie²

¹St Vincent College of Education, Yendi - Northern Region, Ghana

²Swedru Senior High School, Agona Swedru – Central Region, Ghana

Cite this paper:
Evelyn Agyei, Dennis Cornelius Agamah and Gideon Entsie. Availability of Manipulatives in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics in Colleges of Education in Ghana. American Journal of Educational Research. 2022; 10(4):188-193. doi: 10.12691/education-10-4-5

Abstract

One of the many strategies by which students can bring meaning to abstract mathematical ideas is through the use of manipulatives. Manipulatives have the ability to help students learn new concepts and relate new concepts to what they have already learned. However, students’ ability to use them depends on their availability in schools. This study therefore examine the availability of manipulatives in Colleges of Education in Northern Ghana. By doing so 291 pre-service teachers who were randomly selected were presented with checklist to complete, while 8 college staff were interviewed of which 2 were the Heads of the mathematics and ICT department. The results revealed that concrete non-geometry manipulatives were available to pre-service teachers than the concrete geometry manipulatives. Geogebra emerged as the common virtual manipulatives readily available to pre-service teachers. The results further indicated that even though some concrete manipulatives were available, they were inadequate to enhance pre-service teachers’ learning of mathematics. In concluding, the paper suggests that pre-service teachers’ knowledge in mathematics can be enhanced if efforts are made by school authorities and other stakeholders to acquire concrete manipulatives while students are encouraged to purchase virtual manipulatives on their own.

Keywords:
concrete manipulatives virtual manipulatives geometry Teaching and Learning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Sherman, H., & Richardson, L., (1995). Elementary School Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Related to Teaching Mathematics with Manipulatives. Educational Research Quarterly, June 1995, 18, 27-36.
[2]	Giok, L.L. (2008). The Use of Manipulatives in Teaching Primary Mathematics. Unpublished M.Ed. project thesis. University Brunei Darussalam.
[3]	Marshall, L., & Swan, P.(2008). Exploring the use of mathematics Manipulative materials: is it what we think it is?
[4]	Eshiwani,G. S. (1993). Education in Kanya sine independence. East Africa Publishers.
[5]	Yadar, K. (2007). The teaching of Life Sciences. New Delhi; Ammol Publication, Ltd India.
[6]	UNESCO, (2008). Challenges of Implementing Free Day Secondary Schools In Kenya. Experiences from District, Nairobi: UNESCO.
[7]	Chief Examiners Report- BECE Mathematics (2014; 2015; 2016; 2017). West African Examination Council, Accra. Ghana.
[8]	Chief Examiners Report- WASSCE Core Mathematics. (2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018). West African Examination Council, Accra. Ghana.
[9]	Chief Examiners Report- CoE Geometry (2015; 2016; 2017; 2018). West African Examination Council, Accra. Ghana.
[10]	U.E.W. / MoE. (2004). Results from Ghanaian Junior Secondary 2 Pre-service teachers’ participation in TIMSS-2003 in Mathematics and Science. Inspectorate Division, Accra, Ghana: MoEYS.
[11]	Jancas, M. (2007). “TIMSS 2007 sample design”. TIMSS, 77-92.
[12]	Steen, K., Brooks, D. & Lyon, T. (2006). The impact of virtual manipulatives on first grade geometry instruction and learning. Journal in Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25 (4), 373-391.
[13]	Kelly, C. A. (2006). Using Manipulatives in Mathematical Problem Solving: A performance-based analysis. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(2), 184.
[14]	McClung, L. (1998). A study on the use of manipulatives and their effect on student achievement in high school algebra I class. Masters Thesis. Salem-Teikyo University.
[15]	Oyugi, N. L & Nyaga, M, M. (2010). Introduction to Contemporary Issues Affecting Education. Kenya Institute of Special Needs.
[16]	Makokha RN, Wanyonyi KM (2015). The Utilization of Instructional Resources in Teaching Kiswahili Poetry in Secondary Schools in Kenya. Intl J. of Academic Res. in Business and Soc. Sci, 5(8), 10-18.
[17]	Mudulia, A., 2012. The relationship between availability of teaching/learning resources and performance in secondary school science subjects in Eldoret Municipality, Kenya.. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPs), 3 (4), pp. 530-536.
[18]	Jurgenson, R.C., Brown, R.C., Jurgeren, J.W.(1992). Geometry. Bosten: Houghton-Mifflin Co.
[19]	Odili GA (1986): Teaching Mathematics in the Secondary Schools. Enugu, Anambra state Anach-Uma Educational Books.
[20]	Ebo, S.S. (2017). Assessment of factors influencing achievement of geometry among senior high schools (SHS) students. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Education, Winneba).
[21]	Mereku, D. K. (2010). Five decades of school mathematics in Ghana. Mathematics Connections, 9 (8), 73-86.
[22]	Battista, M. T. (2007). Geometry results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 367-373.
[23]	Idris, N. (2006). Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Making Sense and Developing Cognitive Ability. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
[24]	Fletcher, J. A., & Anderson, S. (2012). Improving Pre-service teachers’ Performance in Mensuration at the Senior High School Level using the Geometer’s Sketchpad. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 63-79.
[25]	Tay, M. K., & Wonkyi, T. M. (2018). Effect of using Geogebra on senior high school students’ performance in circle theorems. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 14, 1-18.
[26]	Johnston-Wilder, S., & Mason, J. (2005). Developing Thinking in Geometry. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
[27]	Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitemire, A. (2011). Using manipulatives to teach 135 elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1), 1-6.
[28]	Moyer P 2001 Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics Educ. Stud. Math. 47 175
[29]	Moyer-Packenham, S. P., &. Bolyard, J. J. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics. Research Gate.
[30]	Wales, J. (1975). The place of teaching aids in Nigerian Education. West African Journal of Education, 3(2), 23-29.
[31]	Ekwueme, I. & Igwe, R. (2001): Introduction to the teaching profession, Lagos: JAS Publishers.
[32]	Kocaman, N. B. (2015). the effect of manipulatives on mathematics and attitudes of secondary school students . Journal of Education and Learning. Adiyaman University Press, Adiyaman- Turkey, 5(10), 20-10.
[33]	Gökmen, A. (2012). İlköğretimmatematikvesınıföğretmenlerininmatematikeğitimindemateryal (manipülatif) kullanmayayönelikinançlarıilekullanımdüzeyleriarasındakiilişki (Yayımlanmamışyükseklisanstezi). Konya: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
[34]	Agyei, E. & Yakubu, M. (2020). College pre-service teachers’ perception of the Use of Phones to learn Mathematics. Unpublished
[35]	Agyei, E. (2020). College pre-service teachers’ achievement in mathematics through the use of manipulatives. Thesis. University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast. Unpublished
[36]	Tunç, M. P., Durmuş, S., & Akkaya, R. (2014). İlköğretimmatematiköğretmenadaylarınınmatematiköğretimindesomutmateryal lerivesanalöğrenmenesnelerinikullanmayeterlikleri. MatematikEğitimiDergisi, 1(1), 13-20.
[37]	Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sports, exercise and health. 14 (11). 589-597.
[38]	Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteriafor good measuremants in research: validity and reliability. Ananals of Spiru Haret University. Economics Series. 17 (4), 59-82.
[39]	Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurements, 30 (3), 607-610.