There’s Aha! in Haha: Unraveling the Serious Side of Humor in the Classroom

Arben Gibson G. Camayang¹, Jocelyn D. Natividad², Jamina G. Camayang¹ and Romiro G. Bautista^1,

¹College of Teacher Education, Quirino State University-Main Campus, Philippines

²Cabarroguis National School of Arts and Trades, Department of Education-Quirino, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Arben Gibson G. Camayang, Jocelyn D. Natividad, Jamina G. Camayang and Romiro G. Bautista. There’s Aha! in Haha: Unraveling the Serious Side of Humor in the Classroom. American Journal of Educational Research. 2021; 9(3):142-145. doi: 10.12691/education-9-3-8

Abstract

In a fast-changing classroom setting, one must consider the importance of knowing the qualities of who occupy the four corners of the classroom - the 21^st century learners who have distinct personalities specifically in a dynamic learning environment. This study is designed to explore the experiences of three high school students from Cabarroguis National School of Arts and Trades who experienced humor as a strategic tool in teaching. Qualitative data were gathered from the informants’ interview. Data were processed through document trail among the informants to confirm the veracity of their claims based on the transcriptions. Thematic analysis unraveled four themes on the experiences of the informants: (1) Distinguishing the Ideals, (2) Strict and Serious: A No-No for the Young Learners, (3) To Laugh is to Remember: Humor Aids Recall, and (4) To Laugh is to Connect: Humor Magnets Attention. It is concluded that 21^st century learners are idealistic learners who easily get bored with strict and serious classroom atmosphere but aroused with instructional humor which attracts their attention, maintains their discipline, and improves their performances.

Keywords:
instructional humor 21^st Century Learners action research CNSAT-Quirino philippines

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Banas, JA., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S-J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60:1, 115-144.
[2]	Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 20(2), 198-205.
[3]	Miller, JL., Wilson, K., Miller, J., & Enomoto, K. (2017). Humorous materials to enhance active learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(4), 791-806.
[4]	Wanzer, MB., Frymier, AB., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor’s humor and student’ learning: Instructional Humor Processing Theory. Communication Education, 59 (1), 1-18.
[5]	Deckers, L. & Kizer, P. (1975). Humor and the incongruity hypothesis. The Journal of Psychology, 90, 215-218.
[6]	Monaco, M. & Martin, M. (2007). The millennial student: A new generation of learners. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2, 42-46.
[7]	Segrist, D.J. & Jupp, S.D. (2015). Class is a joke! Humor as a pedagogical tool in the teaching of Psychology. Psychology Teacher Network: American Psychology Association, 25(3), 14-15.
[8]	Schmidt, S.R. (2002). The humour effect: Differential processing and privileged retrieval. Memory, 10, 127-138.
[9]	Berlyne, D.E. (1972). Affective Aspects of Aesthetic Communication. New York: Academic Press.
[10]	Berlyne, D. (1972). Humor and its Kin. New York: Academic Press.
[11]	Aylor, B. & Oppliger, P. (2003). Out-of-Class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style. Communication Education, 52 (2), 122-134.
[12]	Wanzer M., Frymier A., & Irwin J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor’s humor and student learning: Instructional Humor Processing Theory. Communication Education, 59 (1), 1-18.