Embedding Proof-Writing in Phenomenon-based Learning to Promote Students’ Mathematical Creativity

Remelyn L. Asahid^1, and Laila S. Lomibao¹

¹University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Lapasan Highway, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

Cite this paper:
Remelyn L. Asahid and Laila S. Lomibao. Embedding Proof-Writing in Phenomenon-based Learning to Promote Students’ Mathematical Creativity. American Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 8(9):676-684. doi: 10.12691/education-8-9-9

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the significant impact of phenomenon-based learning and embedding proof writing to this new teaching strategy on students’ mathematical creativity in tertiary education. The study used a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. There were 2 experimental groups, one exposed to phenomenon-based learning alone and the other was exposed to phenomenon-based learning with classroom proof-writing activities, and one control group exposed to the conventional method. Multiple solution tasks were used to measure students’ level of creativity. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and ANCOVA. The analysis revealed that students exposed to phenomenon-based learning with proof writing had the highest posttest creativity score. Students in this group had a significantly higher level of creativity among the three groups. Further, students exposed to phenomenon-based learning alone may not outperform students exposed to phenomenon-based learning with proof writing, but they still had significantly higher posttest mean scores compared to students exposed to the conventional type of teaching. The researchers recommend to teachers in tertiary education to use phenomenon-based learning with proof writing in teaching mathematics and its related courses since this instructional approach engages students in learning that is more focused to real-life issues, apply skills and knowledge from different subjects, and enhance important skills like creativity, problem-solving, communication, and teamwork.

Keywords:
phenomenon-based learning proof writing creativity mathematics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Azmidar, A., Darhim, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017, September). Enhancing Students’ Interest through Mathematics Learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012072). IOP Publishing.
[2]	Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537.
[3]	Meissner, H. (2000). Creativity and mathematics education. In meeting of the International Congress on Mathematics Education, Tokyo, Japan.
[4]	Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2011). Creative mathematics teaching in the eye of the beholder: focusing on teachers' conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 17-32.
[5]	Savic, M., Karakok, G., Tang, G., El Turkey, H., & Naccarato, E. (2017). Formative assessment of creativity in undergraduate mathematics: Using a creativity-in-progress rubric (CPR) on proving. In Creativity and giftedness (pp. 23-46). Springer, Cham.
[6]	Gilat, T., & Amit, M. (2014). Revealing Students' Creative Mathematical Abilities through Model-Eliciting Activities of" Real-Life" Situations. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
[7]	Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (2016). Phenomenon-based teaching and learning through the pedagogical lenses of phenomenology: The recent curriculum reform in Finland. In Forum Oświatowe (Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 31-47).
[8]	Karlsson, P. (2017). Teachers' perspective on the national core curriculum of basic education 2016-Finding leverage in supporting upper-comprehensive school teachers with phenomenon-based learning and co-design.
[9]	De Villiers, M. (2010). Experimentation and proof in mathematics. In Explanation and Proof in Mathematics (pp. 205-221). Springer, Boston, MA.
[10]	Luo, W., Hogan, D., Tan, L. S., Kaur, B., Ng, P. T., & Chan, M. (2014). Self‐construal and students’ math self‐concept, anxiety and achievement: An examination of achievement goals as mediators. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 184-195.
[11]	Kattou, M., Christou, C., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2015, February). Mathematical creativity or general creativity?.
[12]	Kroesbergen, E. H., & Schoevers, E. M. (2017). Creativity as predictor of mathematical abilities in fourth graders in addition to number sense and working memory.
[13]	Dougherty, K. (2015). Global Trends in Project Based Learning: From the UK, to Finland and Beyond! Education Insider.
[14]	Borja, M. (2011). Mathematical Creativity on Students’ Solutions to Open-Ended Problems. Unpublished Master’ s Thesis. Philippine Normal University.
[15]	Tough, P. (2016). Helping children succeed: What works and why. Random House.
[16]	Al Kilani, M., & Kobziev, V. (2016). An Overview of Research Methodology in Information System (IS). Open Access Library Journal, 3(11), 1-9.
[17]	Hovorka, D. S., Rees, M. J., & Alkilani, A. H. (2010). A design framework for researching collaborative learning environments.
[18]	Wollack, J. A., Young, M., Klein, E., & Westphal-Johnson, N. (2011). An assessment of writing outcomes in the first semester of college at the University of Wisconsin-Madison: a pilot study.
[19]	Bleiler-Baxter, S. K., & Pair, J. D. (2017). Engaging students in roles of proof. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 16-34.
[20]	Airaksinen, T., Halinen, I., & Linturi, H. (2017). Futuribles of learning 2030-Delphi supports the reform of the core curricula in Finland. European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1), 2.
[21]	Bobrowsky, M., Korhonen, M., & Kohtamäki, J. (2014). Using physical science gadgets and gizmos, grades 6-8: Phenomenon-based learning (Vol. 1). NSTA Press.
[22]	Guswinda, G., Yuanita, P., & Hutapea, N. M. (2019). Improvement of Mathematical Problem Solving and Disposition Ability of MTs Students through Strategies. Think Talk Write in Cooperative Learning in Kuantan Singingi Regency. Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 377-389.
[23]	Yaniawati, P., Kariadinata, R., Sari, N., Pramiarsih, E., & Mariani, M. (2020). Integration of e-Learning for Mathematics on Resource-Based Learning: Increasing Mathematical Creative Thinking and Self-Confidence. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(6), 60-78.
[24]	Stylianides, A. J., Bieda, K. N., & Morselli, F. (2016). Proof and argumentation in mathematics education research. In The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 315-351). Brill Sense.
[25]	Silander, P. (2015). Phenomenon based learning. Retrieved August, 1, 2018.
[26]	Nguyen, H. P. (2018). Phenomenon-based Learning in Finnish and Vietnamese Upper Secondary School Curriculum for English as a Foreign Language.
[27]	Abdel Halim, A. A., Abrahamson, E., Abrahamson, E., Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., Ackroyd, S., & Adams, J. S. (2016). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. In Misbehavior in Organizations: A Dynamic Approach (Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. ii-xvi). London: Bloomsbury.
[28]	Hanna, G. (2000). A critical examination of three factors in the decline of proof. Interchange, 31(1), 21-33.
[29]	Valanne, E., Al Dhaheri, M. R., Kylmalahti, M. R., & Heidi, M. (2017). Phenomenon based learning implemented in abu dhabi school model. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(3), 1-17.
[30]	WAKIL, K., RAHMAN, R., HASAN, D., MAHMOOD, P., & JALAL, T. (2019). Phenomenon-based learning for teaching ict subject through other subjects in primary schools. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(13), 205-212.
[31]	Basu, S., Sengupta, P., & Biswas, G. (2015). A scaffolding framework to support learning of emergent phenomena using multi-agent-based simulation environments. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 293-324.
[32]	Yuliati, L., & Parno, P. (2018, August). Exploration of Physics Problem-Solving Skills Within Phenomenon-Based Learning In Senior High School Students. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 97-103).
[33]	Hemmi, K., & Löfwall, C. (2010). Why do we need proof. In CERME 6, Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Institut National de Recherche Pedagogique.
[34]	Fortes, E. C., & Andrade, R. R. (2019). Mathematical Creativity in Solving Non-Routine Problems. The Normal Lights, 13(1).
[35]	Finnish National Board of Education (FNBE). (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
[36]	Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2015). Examining learning through modeling in K-6 science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2-3), 192-215.
[37]	Chen, M. H., Chang, Y. Y., & Lo, Y. H. (2015). Creativity cognitive style, conflict, and career success for creative entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 906-910.
[38]	Jaimangal-Jones, D., Robertson, M., & Jackson, C. (2018). Event futures: innovation, creativity and collaboration. International Journal of Event and Festival Management.
[39]	Kozlowski, J. S., Chamberlin, S. A., & Mann, E. (2019). Factors that influence mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1), 505-540.
[40]	Hofstein, A., Kipnis, M., & Kind, P. (2008). Enhancing Students'meta-Cognition and Argumentation Skills. Science education issues and developments, 59.
[41]	Marušić, M., & Sliško, J. (2012). Influence of three different methods of teaching physics on the gain in students' development of reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 301-326.
[42]	Kaewkhong, K., Mazzolini, A., Emarat, N., & Arayathanitkul, K. (2010). Thai high-school students’ misconceptions about and models of light refraction through a planar surface. Physics Education, 45(1), 97.
[43]	Yuliati, L., & Mufti, N. (2020, January). Acquisition of projectile motion concepts on phenomenon based physics’ experiential learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1422, No. 1, p. 012007). IOP Publishing.
[44]	Rav, Y. (1999). Why do we prove theorems? Philosophia mathematica, 7(1), 5-41.
[45]	Salleh, F., & Zakaria, E. (2009). Non-routine Problem-solving and Attitudes toward Problem-solving among High Achievers. International Journal of Learning, 16(5).
[46]	Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45-75.
[47]	Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007, July). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In Proceedings of the 31st international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161-168). Seoul, Korea: The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.