American Journal of Educational Research
ISSN (Print): 2327-6126 ISSN (Online): 2327-6150 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/education Editor-in-chief: Ratko Pavlović
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Educational Research. 2013, 1(11), 512-516
DOI: 10.12691/education-1-11-9
Open AccessResearch Article

The Value-Motivational Criterion-Based Assessment of Graduate University Teacher Education Students’ Corporate Culture

Kira Gnyezdilova1,

1Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University at Cherkasy, Cherkasy, Ukraine

Pub. Date: November 15, 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ensuring the quality of higher education)

Cite this paper:
Kira Gnyezdilova. The Value-Motivational Criterion-Based Assessment of Graduate University Teacher Education Students’ Corporate Culture. American Journal of Educational Research. 2013; 1(11):512-516. doi: 10.12691/education-1-11-9

Abstract

An important component of professional culture of teachers employed within the Higher Education (HE) sector is their corporate culture. The effectiveness of corporate culture influences teaching effectiveness. Results show that there is a frequent connection between the institutional goals and corporate culture. The behavioral indicators of the faculty members and interaction with other colleagues and administration depend on the interactions of personal values with values that the university declares. Corporate culture is taught in the higher educational system. A survey conducted among prospective university teachers revealed the need to improve the teaching techniques to ensure training in corporate culture theory. The study confirmed its primary hypothesis: different universities have common features that characterize the effectiveness of corporate culture in future faculty members assessed using value-motivational criterion.

Keywords:
university lecturer faculty members’ corporate culture university corporate culture

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Clark, Burton R., Sustaining Change in Universities. Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts, The Society for Research into Higher Education Open University Press / SL6 2QL, England: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
 
[2]  Cameron, Kim S., Quinn Robert E., Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework, Jossey-Bass San Francisco, 2006, 242.
 
[3]  Beliaev, A., “University Corporate Culture: from Theory to Practice”, Higher Education in Russia, № 11, 62-65, 2007.
 
[4]  Andomin, O. V., Kosinova, S. N., “University Corporate Culture as Pedagogical Problem”, Book of Publications at SamSU, № 5/2 (64), 201-209, 2008.
 
[5]  Korotkov, E. M., Management of Quality Education, Academic Project: Peace, Moscow, 2006, 277.
 
[6]  Poholkov, Yu. P., Pushnyh, V. A., Mitrofanova, M. V., “Corporate Culture at Russian Technical Universities”, Book of University Publications, № 9, 66-71, 2011.
 
[7]  Gnyezdilova, K. N., “Study on Correlation Relationships between Components of University Lecturer’s Organizational Culture”, Scientific Dialogue. Pedagogy, № 8 (20), 52-64, 2013.
 
[8]  Khoruzhy, H. F., Academic Culture: Values and Principles in Higher Education, Navchal'na knyha – Bohdan, Ternopil, 2012, 320.
 
[9]  Andrushchenko, V., “Education: Tendencies in Changes”, Higher Education in Ukraine, № 2. 5-15, 2012.
 
[10]  Andrieeva, I. V., Betina, O. B., Kosheleva, S. V., “Sociocultural Approach to Assess Corporate Values”, Book of Publications SPbG, Ser. 8, Vol. 1. 77-95, 2008.