Apprenticeship Model in Reading: Impeccable Strategy, Excellent Practice

Rebecca Florence Kirunda^1,

¹Languages and Communication Department, Kyambogo University, P. O. Box 1, Kampala, Uganda

Cite this paper:
Rebecca Florence Kirunda. Apprenticeship Model in Reading: Impeccable Strategy, Excellent Practice. American Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 8(2):112-121. doi: 10.12691/education-8-2-7

Abstract

Human survival depends on the ability to acquire and use knowledge to one’s advantage. One avenue of acquiring knowledge is reading. But what is reading? Definitions are numerous and complex. Reading and understanding a text involves a nexus of perceiving the words, evoking memories, ideas and plenty of knowledge. This complexity seems responsible for variations among learners’ reading abilities and their differential academic performances. Basing on data from a quasi-experimental design using pre- and post-tests done by secondary school learners, lesson observations, interviews and focus group discussions, and guided by Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development and The Apprenticeship Model, this study analyses the interplay between the personal, the social, the cognitive and the knowledge building dimensions, scrutinizes the roles played by the internal and external meta-cognition processes to explore possibilities of providing pleasant and gainful reading experiences among Ugandan learners. It establishes that scaffolding is fundamental in teaching reading and suggests strategies for enlivening the reading experience, enhancing the reading culture, and highlights the pedagogical implications on learners’ academic achievements.

Keywords:
reading apprenticeship model Metacognition classroom dimensions cognitive development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Harvey, S. and Goudvis, A., Strategies That Work: Teaching Comprehension for Understanding and Engagement. Stenhouse Publishers, Portland, 2007.
[2]	Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., Cziko, C. and Hurwitz, L. Reading for Understanding: A Guide to Improving Reading in Middle and High School Classrooms. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1999.
[3]	Dorn, L., French, C., and Jones, T., Apprenticeship in Literacy: Transitions across Reading and Writing, Stenhouse Publishers, York Maine, 1999.
[4]	Uwezo Uganda. http://www.uwezo.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/UwezoUganda2015ALAReport-FINAL- EN-web.pdf 2016 Accessed on 20/3/2018.
[5]	Uwezo Uganda. https://www.pmldaily.com/investigations/special-reports/2019/11/new-uwezo-report-reveals-decline-in-literacy- numeracy.html. Accessed on 28/12/2019.
[6]	Uganda Government. (1992). Government White Paper. Kampala: Government Printers.
[7]	Vygotsky, L, Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1978.
[8]	Warford, M. K., The zone of proximal teacher development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 252-258, 2011.
[9]	McLeod, S., Lev Vygotsky. www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html Accessed on 20/3/2018 2014.
[10]	Kendra, C., What is the zone of proximal development? An important component of the social learning process https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-zone-of-proximal-development 2019. Accessed on 24 July 2019
[11]	https://www.google.com/search?q=zpd&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source =univ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiLp7X8y93dAhUFbFAKHd4bAfsQ iR56BAgEEBI&biw=1366&bih=657 Accessed on 12/11/2019.
[12]	Ellis, R., Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press, China, 2003.
[13]	Fani, T., and Ghaemi, F., “Implications of Vygotsky's zone of proximal development in teacher education and self-scaffolding,” Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 29, 1549-1554, 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.lib.usf.edu Accessed on June 10, 2019.
[14]	Psychology Notes H Q., Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of cognitive 2017, https://www.psychologynoteshq.com/vygotsky-theory/evelopment Retrieved on 20/3/2018.
[15]	Calkins, L. M., The Art of Teaching Reading, Longman, New York, 2001.
[16]	Halliday, M., Learning How to Mean: Exploration in the Department of Language, Edward Arnold, London, 1975.
[17]	Clay, M., Becoming Literate: The Construction of Inner Control Heinemann, Portsmouth, 1991.
[18]	Banda, F., A survey of literacy practices in black and coloured communities in South Africa: Towards pedagogy of multiliteracy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(2), 106-129 (2003).
[19]	Barton, D., and Hamilton, M., Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in one Community, Routledge, New York, 1998.
[20]	Collins, J., “Literacy and literacies” in Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 1995, 75-93.
[21]	Finnegan, R., Literacy versus non-literacy: The great divide. In Horton, R & R Finnegan (eds), Modes of thought. Faber, London, 112-144, 1973.
[22]	Finnegan, R., Literacy and Orality. Blackwell, Oxford, 1988.
[23]	Gee, J. P., Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in discourse. Falmer Press, London, 1990.
[24]	Street, B. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.
[25]	Street, B, Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy Development, Ethnography and Education. Longman, London, 1995.
[26]	Street, B, Literacy events and literacy practices: theory and practice in the New Literacy Studies. In Martin-Jones, M. & K. Jones (eds), Multilingual Literacies: Reading and Writing Different Worlds. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 17-29, 2000.
[27]	Banda, F. and Kirunda, R., Factors affecting the initial literacy development of urban and rural learners in the Iganga District, Uganda in Per Linguam A Journal of Language Learning, Volume 21(2):1-23 2005
[28]	Nankindu, P., Kirunda, R. and Ogavu, T. Language in Education in Uganda: The policy, the actors and the practices. A case of the Urban District of Kampala. Paripex-Indian Journal of Research, 4(5) 2015.
[29]	Kirunda, R. and Nankindu, P., The language in education quandary Research journali’s Journal of Education Vol. 5 (9), 2017.
[30]	Atwell, N., In the Middle: A New Understanding about Writing, Reading, and Learning, Boynton/Cook Publishers, Portsmouth, 1998.
[31]	Flavell, J., Metacognitive dimensions of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.) The Nature of Intelligence, Erlbaum, Hillsdale. N. J. 1976.
[32]	Mills, K., Floating on the sea of talk: comprehension through speaking and listening. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 325-329, 2009.
[33]	Tovani, C., Do I Really Have to Teach Reading? Content Comprehension, Grades 6-12, ME: Stenhouse, Portland, 2004.
[34]	Kelley M. and Clausen-Grace, N., Facilitating engagement by differentiating independent reading. The Reading Teacher. 63(4): 313, 2009.
[35]	Guthrie , J., Van Meter, P., Mccann, A., Wingfield, L., Abennet, L. and Poundstone, C., Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivation and strategies during concept-oriented reading instructions. Reading Research Quarterly 3(3): 306-332, 1996.
[36]	Guthrie, J. and Wingfield, A. Engagement and motivation in reading, In M. Kamil, P. Monthesal, P Pearson and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook in Reading Research Vol. 3, 403-422: Erlbaum, Mahwah, 2000.
[37]	Source: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/mature-teacher-teaching-group-of-college-students-royalty-free- image/1060396774?adppopup=true Accessed on 12/11/2019.
[38]	Downing, M., “Beyond the information given: response to nonfiction”, In Holland, K., R Hungerford, and S. Ernest, (Eds), Journeying: Children Responding to Literature. Heinemann, United States of America, 1993.
[39]	Barton, D, The social nature of writing. In Barton D and R Ivanic (eds), Writing in the community, Sage, London, 1991.
[40]	Rogoff, B., Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.
[41]	Reyes, I. and Azuara. P., Emergent biliteracy in young Mexican immigrant children, Reading Research Quarterly, International Reading Association 43(4): 374-37, 2008
[42]	Lui, A., Zone of proximal development (ZPD) https://vygotskyetec512.weebly.com/zone-of-proximal-development.html 2012, Accessed on November 13, 2018.
[43]	Knestrick, J., Early learning: teacher and administrator benefits of teaching in the zone. https://www.nwea.org/blog/2013/early-childhood-learning-teacher-and-administrator-benefits-of- teaching-in-the-zone/#sthash.zZviaDa6 2013, Accessed on November 13, 2018
[44]	De Valenzuela, J., Socio-cultural views of learning, The SAGE Handbook of Special Education. Sage Publications, London, 2006.
[45]	Hirsch, E., Reading comprehension requires knowledge of words and the world. In American Educator 27, (1), 2003.
[46]	Vygotsky, L, Thoughts and Language, M A: MIT press Cambridge, 1962.
[47]	Faltis, C., and Coulter, C., Teaching English Learners I Immigrant Secondary Schools. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2008.
[48]	Hatch, J., Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings, University of New York Press, Albany, 2002.
[49]	Riazi, M., and Rezaii, M., Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviours: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. In A. Feryok (Ed.), CLESOL 2010: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Languages and ESOL, 55-63, 2011.
[50]	Roosevelt, F., Zone of Proximal Development. Encyclopaedia of Educational Psychology Sage Publication, 2008.
[51]	Shanahan, T. and Shanahan, C, Teaching disciplinary Literature to Adolescents: Rethinking Content Area Literacy. Harvard Educational Review: Harvard Educational Publishing Group, Spring 78, (1) 2008, 40-59.