Role-play Activities as a Framework for Developing Argumentation Skills on Biological Issues in Secondary Education

Angeliki Maniatakou¹, Issidora Papassideri¹ and Martha Georgiou^1,

¹Section of Cell Biology & Biophysics, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Cite this paper:
Angeliki Maniatakou, Issidora Papassideri and Martha Georgiou. Role-play Activities as a Framework for Developing Argumentation Skills on Biological Issues in Secondary Education. American Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 8(1):7-15. doi: 10.12691/education-8-1-2

Abstract

Argumentation is a necessary skill for every citizen in a modern democratic society. Although in recent years many countries have incorporated it into their science curricula, students have been experiencing difficulties in developing argumentative skills. Socio-scientific issues (SSI) and role-playing activities, are thought to constitute ideal frameworks for helping students overcome these difficulties. The purpose of this study is to examine the degree of which a role-playing activity created by 10th grade’s Greek State school students and relevant to an SSI from the field of Biology can enhance their argumentation skills. Students answered five open-ended questions, and their arguments were evaluated based on the Toulmin’s model. The results showed that despite the general low level of arguments provided by the students, there was an indicative improvement in the argumentation level of question number 3. This indicates that a creative role-playing activity which actively involves students can have a positive impact on the development of students’ argumentation skills. The increase in argumentation level was also reflected in the students' ability to construct stronger arguments during the activity, which has a promising interpretation.

Keywords:
argumentation socioscientific issues science education biology education creative role-playing vaccination

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Patronis, T., Potari, D. and Spiliotopoulou, V., “Students’ argumentation in decisionmaking on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching”, International Journal of Science Education, 21 (7), 745-754. 1999.
[2]	Driver, R., Newton, P. and Osborne, J. “Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms”, Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. 2000.
[3]	Dawson, V. and Venville, G., “Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics”, Research in Science Education, 40 (2), 133-148. 2010.
[4]	Sadler, T. D. and Zeidler, D. L., “The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas”, Science education, 88 (1), 4-27. 2004.
[5]	Dawson, V. M. and Venville, G., “High school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy?”, International Journal of Science Education, 11 (31), 1421-1445. 2009.
[6]	Zohar, A. and Nemet, F., “Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics”, Journal of research in science teaching, 39 (1), 35-62. 2002.
[7]	Erduran, S. J. and Jiménez-Aleixandre, MP., “Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview. S. Erduran, J. & MP Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.)", Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research, 3-28. 2007.
[8]	Osborne, J., Erduran, S. and Simon, S., “Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science”, Journal of research in science teaching, 41 (10), 994-1020. 2004a.
[9]	Newton, P., Driver, R. and Osborne, J. “The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science”, International Journal of Science Education, 21 (5), 553-576. 1999.
[10]	Evagorou, M. and Osborne, J., “Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50 (2), 209-237. 2013.
[11]	Simon, S., “Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science”, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31 (3), 277-289. 2008.
[12]	Erduran, S., Simon, S. and Osborne, J., “TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse”, Science Education, 88 (6), 915-933. 2004.
[13]	Simon, S., Erduran, S. and Osborne, J., “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom”, International Journal of Science Education, 28 (2-3), 235-260. 2006.
[14]	Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. and Erduran S., Argumentation in Science Education. Perspectives from a classroom-based research, New York, Springer. 2008.
[15]	Georgiou, M. and Mavrikaki, E., “Greek students’ ability in argumentation and informal reasoning about socioscientific issues related to biotechnology. In C.P. Constantinou, N Papadouris, & A Hadjigeogiou (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), pp. 1158-1166, Nicosia Cyprus. 2013.
[16]	Georgiou, M. and Mavrikaki, E., “Do greek students argument? The case of socio-scientific issues from the field of biotechnology, Themes in Science and Technology Education, 9 (3), 137-149. 2017. (in greek)
[17]	Georgiou, M., “The ability of students to develop scientific arguments in biological issues with social implications. Focused teaching intervention on the issue from the field of biotechnology”, Doctoral Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2016. (in greek)
[18]	Simonneaux, L., “Role-play or debate to promote students’ argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis”, International Journal of Science Education, 23 (9), 903-927. 2001.
[19]	Duschl, R. A. and Osborne, J. “Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education”, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72. 2002.
[20]	Simonneaux, L., “Analysis of classroom debating strategies in the field of biotechnology”, Journal of Biological Education, 37 (1), 9-12. 2002.
[21]	Erduran, S., and Osborne, J., “Developing Arguments”, In S. Alsop, L. Bencze, & E. Pedretti (Eds.), Analysing exemplary Science Teaching: Theoretical Lenses and a Spectrum of Possibilities for Practice, Philadelphia: Open University Press. 2005.
[22]	Agell, L., Soria, V. and Carrió, M., “Using Role Play to Debate Animal Testing”, Journal of Biological Education, 49 (3). 309-321. 2015.
[23]	McSharry, G. and Jones, S., “Role-play in science teaching and learning”, School Science Review, 82 (298), 73-82. 2000.
[24]	Belova, N., Eilks, I. and Feierabend, T., “The Evaluation of Role-Playing in the Context of Teaching Climate Change”, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13 (1). 165-190. 2013.
[25]	Phillips, B.S., The effects of role-play on concept understanding and critical thinking skills of middle school students, Master Thesis, Montana State University. 2013.
[26]	Duveen, J. and Solomon, J., “The great evolution trial: Use of role play in the classroom”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (5), 575-582. 1994.
[27]	Kolstø, S. D. and Ratcliffe, M., Social aspects of argumentation. In Argumentation in science education (pp. 117-136). Springer Netherlands. 2007.
[28]	Cakici, Y. and Bayir, E., “Developing Children’s Views of the Nature of Science Through Role Play”, International Journal of Science Education, 34 (7), 1075-1091. 2012.
[29]	Zeidler, D. L. and Sadler, T. D., The role of moral reasoning in argumentation: Conscience, character, and care, S. Erduran, J. and MP Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research, 201-216. 2007.
[30]	Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P. and Howe, A., “Creative learning environments in education-A systematic literature review”, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8 (1), 80-91. 2013.
[31]	Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R.A. and Runco, M.A., Theories of Creativity. In: Kaufman, J.C. and Sternberg, R.J., Eds., Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 20-47. 2010.
[32]	Zeidler, D.L. and Nichols, B. H., “Socioscientific Issues: Theory and Practice”, Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21 (2), 49-58. 2009.
[33]	Holmbeck, G. N., Williams, P. G. and Greenley, R. N. Adolescent health psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70 (3), 828-842. 2002.
[34]	Woodgate, R. and Leach, J., “Youth’s perspectives on the determinants of health”, Qualitative Health Research, 20 (9), 1173-1182. 2010.
[35]	Michaelson, V., McKerron, Μ. and Davison, C., “Forming ideas about health: A qualitative study of Ontario adolescents”, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 10 (1). 2015.
[36]	World Health Organization, “Situation report #2, August 2019”. 2019. [Online]. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/communicable-diseases/measles-and- rubella/publications/situation-reports-measles-in-the-european- region/situation-report-2,-august-2019 [Accessed Sept. 15, 2019].
[37]	Toulmin, S. E., The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition, Cambridge University Press. 2003.
[38]	Novak, J. D. and Cañas, A. J. “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008”, Florida, Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2008. [Online]. Available at: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf [Assessed July, 9, 2018].
[39]	Mavrikaki, E., Gouvra, M. and Kabouri, A., Biology Highschool Textbook, CTI Diophantus, Athens. 2012. (in greek)
[40]	Tsartsiotou, Z. “Argumentation as a teaching strategy of the Nature of Science”, Doctoral Thesis, School of Primary Education, Thessaloniki. 2015. (in greek)
[41]	Dorion, K. R., “Science through Drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons”, International Journal of Science Education, 31 (16), 2247-2270. 2009.