Using Interactive Whiteboard in Teaching Islamic Education and Its Effect on Some Variables

Mahmoud J. Al-Salkhi^1,

¹Department of Educational Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan

Cite this paper:
Mahmoud J. Al-Salkhi. Using Interactive Whiteboard in Teaching Islamic Education and Its Effect on Some Variables. American Journal of Educational Research. 2019; 7(3):249-257. doi: 10.12691/education-7-3-10

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of using Interactive Whiteboard in teaching Islamic Education on the achievement and learning motivation of the 7^th grade students. The empirical method was used in this study. The study sample consisted of 89 participants who were selected randomly. The achievement test and learning motivation scales were used as study tools. The results have shown statistically significant differences in post-achievement due to the method of teaching, and were in favor of Interactive Whiteboard, and also in favor of male students. In addition, some statistically significant differences were indicated between the average scores of the experimental group on the pre - and post-motivational scale as shown in the post-application. Also, significant differences were indicated between the average performance of the two groups on the learning motivation scale of the Islamic Education, and was in favor of the experimental group. The absence of a statistically significant effect on students' achievement and learning motivation were attributed to the interaction between the teaching method and the gender of the students.

Keywords:
Islamic education interactive whiteboard study achievement learning motivation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Clark, R. & Mayer, R. (2003). E- Learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco. John Wiley and sons Inc.
[2]	Grabowski، B. L. (2004). Generative learning contributions to the design of instruction and learning. In D. H. Jonassen & Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed. pp. 719-743). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[3]	Marzano, R& Hayst. (2009). Final report on the evaluation of the promethean technology. Englewood coi Marzano Research laboratory.
[4]	Mazen, H. (2014). Educational Technology. Introduction to information technology, Dar Alolom, Cairo.
[5]	Ishtaiwa, F. & Shana, Z. (2011). The use of interactive whiteboard (IWB) by pre-service teachers to enhance Arabic language teaching and learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 8(2), 1-18.
[6]	Jubeli, I (2014). The Effectiveness of Integrating Smart Board and Metacognitive Skills on Knowledge Achievement Related to Instructional Courseware Production Skills among Instructional Technology Students. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences. 10(1). 121-132.
[7]	Al- Muwalla, J. (2012). The Effect of using the interactive board of fourth grade student's achievement in mathematics and their verbal interaction during the teaching process in Jordan.
[8]	Mata, L., Lazar, G., Lazar, I., (2016). Effects of study levels on students' attitudes towards interactive whiteboards in higher education, Computer in Human Behavior, 54, C, 278-289.
[9]	Alrasheed, S. (2014). The effect of using the interactive whiteboard on the achievement of eleventh grade students in the biology course and their attitudes towards it as a teaching tool in Kuwait.
[10]	Taskin, E. (2013). Teachers' Perceptions of professional development for the use of interactive whit board in Turkey. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Northern Iowa.
[11]	Ozerbas, M. (2013). The Effect of the Use of Interactive Whiteboard on Students’ Motivation, African Journal of Business Education. 1(5): 120-125.
[12]	Al-Asmari, T (2011). The impact of teaching using traditional interactive whiteboard and blackboard on the prompt collection and survival impact student learning in sixth grade. Journal of the development of university performance.
[13]	Riska، (2010). The Impact of Smart Board technology on Growth in mathematics achievement of gifted learners, school of Education, North Carolina.
[14]	Jordan Education Initiative (2010). Promethean interactive white boards in the /discovery schools. Retrieved April 18, 2012, from: http://www.jei.org.jo.
[15]	Aljwair, A. (2009): The effect of using multimedia computerized programme teaching science using the smart board on the primary stage students' performance and cognitive skills. Master thesis, unpublished. Faculty of Education, Literary Departments, Prince Noura bint Abdulrahman University.
[16]	Paino, T. (2009). Effect of Technology on student Achievement and motivation in mathematics. Unpublished Master Thesis. Caldwell College.
[17]	Swan, K., kratcoski, A., Schenker, J& Van, M. (2009(. Interactive whiteboards and student Achievement: Practices that enhance efficacy. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association .San Diago. USA.
[18]	Smith, F. Hardman, F. and Higgins S. 2006: The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies, British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.
[19]	[19]Zittle, F. (2004). Enhancing Native American Mathematics Learning: The Use of Smart board-generated Virtual manipulative for Conceptual Understanding. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 2004 (pp. 5512-5515). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[20]	Alsalkhi, M. (2014). Difficulties of Teaching Islamic Education As Viewed By the Female Teachers of the Lower Basic Stage In Amman. Journal of Education / Kuwait University, N.113, 47-54.