The Impact of Prior Exposure to Calculus

Matthew R. Schraeder^1, , Laura J. Pyzdrowski¹ and David A. Miller¹

¹Department of Mathematics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States

Cite this paper:
Matthew R. Schraeder, Laura J. Pyzdrowski and David A. Miller. The Impact of Prior Exposure to Calculus. American Journal of Educational Research. 2019; 7(3):237-243. doi: 10.12691/education-7-3-8

Abstract

Many students who take calculus in high school opt to retake the course in college. This study investigated the impact of that prior exposure. Students were invited to complete a survey about their experiences with calculus, with eight being interviewed afterwards. While students nearly unanimously agreed that prior experience with calculus was a benefit, none felt that it was a necessity to succeed in a college calculus course. Also, a few students identified some detriments to having taken calculus in high school, mostly stemming from an inadequate high school class. Despite the students’ perceptions, Pearson’s Chi Square Tests identified a significant difference in both the students’ success (pass/fail) and letter grades based on the method of placement into Calculus I (testing in via a placement test did better than taking the pre-requisite courses), but not based on either prior exposure to calculus or type of calculus taken during high school (AP and taking the test, AP and not taking the test, non-AP, or no calculus). A survey on student perceptions identified calculus as the most beneficial class to take before Calculus I, but interviews indicated algebra and trigonometry as the most beneficial.

Keywords:
calculus AP success prior experience algebra trigonometry placement

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Wieschenberg, A. A. (1994). Overcoming conditioned helplessness in mathematics. College Teaching, 42(2), 51-54.
[2]	McDonald, K. (1987). Science and mathematics leaders call for radical reform in calculus teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education, 34(10), A1, A23.
[3]	Bressoud, D., Rasmussen, C., Ellis, J., Larsen, S., Braddy, L., & Johnson, E. (2016). Progress through calculus: National survey summary. Retrieved from http://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/PtC%20Survey%20Report.pdf.
[4]	Bressoud, D. (2015, June 6). Calculus at crisis II: The rush to calculus [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://launchings.blogspot.com/2015/06/calculus-at-crisis-ii-rush-to-calculus.html.
[5]	Burton, M. B. (1989). The effect of prior calculus experience on" introductory" college calculus. American Mathematical Monthly, 350-354.
[6]	Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Gaudard, M. (1992). Secondary school calculus: Preparation or pitfall in the study of college calculus?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 56-71.
[7]	Pyzdrowski, L., Pyzdrowski, A., Ogden, L., & Walker, V. (2013). Indicators for success in first year calculus. Proceedings of The 11th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education, USA. Retrieved from http://www.hiceducation.org/proceedings_edu.htm
[8]	Pyzdrowski, L. J., Sun, Y., Curtis, R., Miller, D., Winn, G., & Hensel, R. A. (2013). Readiness and attitudes as indicators for success in college calculus. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 529-554.
[9]	Pyzdrowski, L., Ogden, L., Pyzdrowski, A., & Walker, V. (2016). A longitudinal study of students in a dual-enrollment mathematics program: A focus on preparation for calculus. American Journal of Educational Research. 4(2), 204-209.
[10]	Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.
[11]	Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. College Mathematics Journal, 362-372.
[12]	Hagedorn, L. S., Siadat, M. V., Fogel, S. F., Nora, A., & Pascarella, E. T. (1999). Success in college mathematics: Comparisons between remedial and nonremedial first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 261-284.