Investigation of Physicochemical and Mechanical Property of UTAN Granites for Building Applications

Dare Victor Abere^1, , Grace Modupe Oyatogun², Azeez Lawan Rominiyi³, Abiodun Ayodeji Abioye⁴, Ifeoluwa Emmanuel Akinwole², Igbonwelundu Magnus T.¹, Oyeniran Amos Oyatogun⁵, Clive Na'andur Dagwai⁶ and Oluwabunmi Pamilerin Abioye⁴

¹Department of Metal Processing and Production, National Metallurgical Development Centre, Jos, Nigeria

²Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile ¨C Ife, Nigeria

³Department of Research and Development, Prototype Engineering Development Institute, Ilesa, Nigeria

⁴Department of Mechanical Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

⁵Department of Materials Analysis and metal Testing, Metallurgical Development Centre, Jos, Nigeria

⁶Department of Material Analysis and Metal Testing, National Metallurgical Development Centre, Jos, Nigeria

Cite this paper:
Dare Victor Abere, Grace Modupe Oyatogun, Azeez Lawan Rominiyi, Abiodun Ayodeji Abioye, Ifeoluwa Emmanuel Akinwole, Igbonwelundu Magnus T., Oyeniran Amos Oyatogun, Clive Na'andur Dagwai and Oluwabunmi Pamilerin Abioye. Investigation of Physicochemical and Mechanical Property of UTAN Granites for Building Applications. American Journal of Mining and Metallurgy. 2017; 4(1):37-44. doi: 10.12691/ajmm-4-1-3

Abstract

The granite formation for production of dimension stone blocks at Utan was investigated in three different locations A, B and C in a view to examine the physical properties of Utan granite using saturation and Buoyancy technique; evaluate some of its mechanical properties; determine its rate of emission of radioactive elements with Geiger Muller Counter; examine its polish-ability; and carry out chemical analysis of the granite samples with the aid of energy dispersive x-ray florescence (ED-XRF). The average porosity obtained is 0.53, 1.08; and 0.86 while the respective average density of 2.58, 2.62 and 2.60 g/cm³ were obtained for A, B and C. The compressive strength of 207.5, 204.6 and 203.4 MPa; and tensile strength of 13.86, 13.68 and 13.60 MPa were obtained for A, B and C respectively. Rockwell hardness values obtained are 89.0, 89.9 and 86.6 while the morh¡¯s hardness values are 6.90, 6.96 and 7.03 respectively for sample A; B and C. The impact values obtained are 0.089, 0.092 and 0.094 for A, B and C respectively. The radioactive rates of samples A, B and C are 6.42, 8.86 and 8.16 Mrem respectively. Sample B is observed to be more radioactive. Both samples are polish able. Conclusively, the three tested granite rocks have suitable physical and mechanical properties that meant the requirement for building purposes; from the polish-ability test, it shows that the three (3) granite outcrops are suitable for the production of granite tiles; countertops; slabs. The chemical analysis revealed that the granite is dominated by quartz (SiO₂) which contributes greatly to the hardness of the rock. Also from the radioactive test, the granite samples proved conclusively that the rate of radiation found occasionally in a slab of granite is not harmful to humans when exposed to it. Hence, granite the formation of Utan will be a good building stone material.

Keywords:
granite building radioactive impact strength

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	O. O. David; O. A. Noah and S. A. Agbalajobi ¡®An Empirical Analysis of the Contribution of Mining Sector to Economic Development in Nigeria' Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Volume 19, Number 1, 2016.
[2]	T. R. Ajayi, Modern Research Methods and Tools for Estimation and Economic Evaluation of Ore Endowment and Resources. Paper presented at the International Conference on Modern Trends in Mineral Processing held at RMRDC, Abuja, 23 rd June, 2010.
[3]	D. Alison-Madueke, Opportunities in Nigeria's Minerals Sector. Ministry of Mines and Steel Development, Abuja, Nigeria, 22nd April 2009.
[4]	G. Bridge, Economic geography: natural resources. In: International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography. Eds. Kitchin and Thrift. Elsevier. 2008.
[5]	J.I.D. Adekeye, Solid Minerals Development: Nigeria's Economic Mirage. Earth Sciences Research Communications 1(1): pp. 10-24. Published by Research Communications, Lagos. 1999.
[6]	X. S. Martin and A. Subramanian "Addressing the Natural Resource Curse: An Illustration from Nigeria" International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2003
[7]	W. R. Fitches, A.C Ajibade, I.G. Egbuniwe, R.W. Holt and J.B. Wright. Late Proterozoic schist belts and plutonism in N.W. Nigeria. J. Geol. Soc. London 1985, 142: 319-337.
[8]	G. A. Anikoh, P. A. Adesida and O. C. Afolabi, ¡®Investigation of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Selected Rock Types in Kogi State Using Hardness Tests' Journal of Mining World Express (MWE) Volume 4, 2015.
[9]	B. Adebayo and E. C. Umeh, ¡®Influence of some Rock Properties on Blasting Performance', J. Eng. Applied Sci, 2(1), 2007, pp 41-44.
[10]	S. Kahraman, N. Bilgin and C. Feridunoghi, Dominant Rock Properties Affecting the Penetration Rate of Percussive Drills. Int. J. Rock Mechanics Mining Sci. (40), 2003, pp. 711©\723.
[11]	O. Ojo and B. M. Olaleye, ¡®Classification of Ondo State Intact Rock for Engineering Purposes'. Journal of Sci. Eng. and tech., (11) 3, 2004, pp. 5753-5759.
[12]	D. U. Deere and R. P. Miller,¡®Engineering Classification and Index Properties for Intact Rock'. Tech. Report. Air Force Weapons Lab., New Mexico, 1966 No. AFWL©\TR©\65©\116.
[13]	R. Altindag and A. Guney, Predicting the Relationships between Brittleness and Mechanical Properties (UCS, TS and SH) of Rocks. Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 5(16), 2010, pp. 2107-2118.
[14]	ISRM. Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring ISRM Commission on Testing methods, E. T. Brown Edition. Pergamon Press Oxford 211p. 1981.
[15]	ASTM. Annual Book of ASTM Standard Construction Soil and Rocks. ASTM Publication, Vol. 04, No. 08 1994, p. 975.
[16]	DeWiest, R. J, M., Ed., 1969. Flow through Porous Media, Academic Press, New York.
[17]	The Institution of Structural Engineers (ISE). Manual for the Design of Plain Masonry in Building Structures to Eurocode 6; the Institution of Structural Engineers: London, UK, 2008
[18]	N. Jackson, R. Dhir, Civil Engineering Materials; Macmillian Press: London, UK, 1996
[19]	B. Olusola, O. Akintayo, An Assessment of failure of building component in Nigeria. J. Build. Apprais. 2009, 4, 279-286.
[20]	http://www.genuinestone.com/about_granite.php Common Stone Types and Technical Stone Research Results .Building Stone Institute.
[21]	B.K. Baiden, M. Tuuli, Impact of quality control practices in sandcrete blocks production. J. Arch. Eng. 2004, 10, 55-60.
[22]	ASTM C 117 Standard Test Method for Materials finer than 75-um (No. 200) sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing. American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohocken. 1995.
[23]	The Nigerian Industrial Standards (NIS). Draft Code of Practice for Sandcrete Blocks; Federal Ministries of Industries, NIS: Lagos, Nigeria, 1975.
[24]	D. J. Harrison and A. J. Bloddworth, Construction Materials, Industrial Minerals Laboratory Manual. Technical Report WG/94/12, Nottingham. 1994.
[25]	United States Environmental Protection Agency, Health Physics Society, Radiation Protection 2016.