American Journal of Cancer Prevention
ISSN (Print): 2328-7314 ISSN (Online): 2328-7322 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajcp Editor-in-chief: Nabil Abdel-Hamid
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2023, 10(1), 1-4
DOI: 10.12691/ajcp-10-1-1
Open AccessArticle

Effect of Perioperative Period Nursing on Quality of Life of Patients with Breast Reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap

Ya-qi Wang1, , Yu Wang2, Jian-hui Gan3, Yan Li2, Xue Yun2 and Mo-nan Li2

1Department of Surgical Oncology, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China

2Department of Surgical Nursing, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China

3Department of Anesthesiology, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China

Pub. Date: February 24, 2023

Cite this paper:
Ya-qi Wang, Yu Wang, Jian-hui Gan, Yan Li, Xue Yun and Mo-nan Li. Effect of Perioperative Period Nursing on Quality of Life of Patients with Breast Reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap. American Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2023; 10(1):1-4. doi: 10.12691/ajcp-10-1-1

Abstract

To investigate the effect of perioperative period nursing on the quality of life of patients with breast reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap. A total of 90 patients with breast reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap were enrolled from January 2018 to November 2019. Grouped by digital table method, 90 cases patients were divided into experimental group and control group, with 45 cases in each group. The control group received clinical routine nursing, the observation group received targeted nursing intervention measures during perioperative period. The satisfaction and the occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. The average length of hospital stay and postoperative upper limb rehabilitation training compliance; upper limb function score and quality of life score before and after nursing; incidence of upper limb numbness and scar contracture. The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was statistically significant compared with the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly less than that of the control group, and the postoperative upper limb rehabilitation training compliance was higher than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was little difference in quality of life score and upper limb function score between the two groups before treatment. The difference was not statistically significant. After nursing, the quality of life score and upper limb function score of the experimental group patients. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of upper limb numbness and scar contracture in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of rehabilitation nursing after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer is effective in the treatment of modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. It can effectively improve the upper limb function, reduce the incidence of upper limb complications, and improve the quality of life and satisfaction of patients. Perioperative nursing intervention in patients with I stage of latissimus dorsi flap after breast modified radical mastectomy can effectively prevent the occurrence of serious complications and improve the satisfaction of breast reconstruction and the success rate of operation.

Keywords:
perioperative period nursing breast reconstruction with Latissimus Dorsi Flap effect of intervention

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  LIN X, CAI Y, CHEN X, et al. Analgesia and stress attenuation of ultrasound‐guided modified pectoral nerve block type‐II with different volumes of 0.3% ropivacaine in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer: A prospective parallel randomized double‐blind controlled clinical trial [J]. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 2022, 47(10): 1676-83.
 
[2]  THAKUR M, SHARMA R, MISHRA A K, et al. Psychological distress and body image disturbances after modified radical mastectomy among breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care centre in North India [J]. The Lancet Regional Health-Southeast Asia, 2022, 7(5): 100077.
 
[3]  REN T, WU J, QIAN L, et al. Comparison of Efficacy and Psychology of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy on Patients with Early Breast Cancer under Graded Nursing [J]. Computational & Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, 6(40): 1-7.
 
[4]  QIU J, WEN N, XIE Y, et al. Novel technique for endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with endoscopic-assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvest through a single axillary incision: a retrospective cohort study of comparing endoscopic and open surgery [J]. Gland Surgery, 2022, 11(8): 1383-94.
 
[5]  MA J-X, LI B, XIA Y-C, et al. Latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer through endoscopic approach combined with the implant after tissue expansion for breast reconstruction of mastectomy patients [J]. BMC surgery, 2022, 22(1): 1-10.
 
[6]  MA J X, LI B, XIA Y C, et al. Latissimus dorsi muscle flap transfer [J]. BMC surgery, 2022, 22(10): 2-10.
 
[7]  HUANG J, YU Y, WEI C, et al. Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery dissection in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(11): e0142271.
 
[8]  HSU S-C, WANG H-H, CHU S-Y, et al. Effectiveness of informational and emotional consultation on the psychological impact on women with breast cancer who underwent modified radical mastectomy [J]. Journal of Nursing Research, 2010, 18(3): 215-26.
 
[9]  SOOD R, EASOW J M, KONOPKA G, et al. Latissimus dorsi flap in breast reconstruction: recent innovations in the workhorse flap [J]. Cancer Control, 2018, 25(1): 1073274817744638.
 
[10]  ESCANDóN J M, ESCANDóN L, AHMED A, et al. Breast reconstruction using the Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Immediate Fat Transfer (LIFT): A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2022, 75(11): 4106-16.
 
[11]  TAGHIZADEH R. Invited Discussion on: Identifying Preoperative Factors Associated with the Volume Discrepancy in Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction with the Extended Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap Coverage [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2019, 43(6): 1497-9.
 
[12]  LEUZZI S, STIVALA A, SHAFF J, et al. Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction with or without implants: A comparison between outcome and patient satisfaction [J]. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2019, 72(3): 381-93.
 
[13]  KAT C, DARCY C, O’DONOGHUE J, et al. The use of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap for immediate correction of the deformity resulting from breast conservation surgery [J]. British journal of plastic surgery, 1999, 52(2): 99-103.
 
[14]  BONDE C T, HøJVIG J B, JENSEN L T, et al. Long-term results of a standardized enhanced recovery protocol in unilateral, secondary autologous breast reconstructions using an abdominal free flap [J]. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2022, 75(3): 1117-22.
 
[15]  FUFA D, OSEI D, ANTONIETTI S, et al. Acute Care Rehabilitation Following Upper and Lower Extremity Free Flap Surgery: A Review of Best Practices and Case Reports [J]. Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy, 2022, 13(2): 92-100.
 
[16]  LIU L, ZHANG L, LUO Y, et al. Inverted T-Shaped Flap Nursing after the Reverse Double V-Shaped Mastoconstriction Suspension for Breast Cancer [J]. Advances in Breast Cancer Research, 2021, 10(4): 165-72.
 
[17]  EASTON J, ROBERTO A, LAX E, et al. Using a Business Model (the 4 Disciplines of Execution) to Improve Consistency, Efficiency, and Length of Stay in Microvascular Autologous Breast Reconstruction [J]. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2022, 89(5): 532-7.