From Perceived Similarity of Ideals to Relationship Satisfaction: A Path Analysis Using Dyadic Data

Iulia-Diana Muraru^1, , Magdalena Iorga² and Nicoleta Turliuc³

¹Psychologist, Special School ¡°C. Paunescu¡±, Iasi, Romania

²Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ¡°Gr.T.Popa¡±, Iasi, Romania

³Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, University ¡°Al.I.Cuza¡±, Iasi, Romania

Cite this paper:
Iulia-Diana Muraru, Magdalena Iorga and Nicoleta Turliuc. From Perceived Similarity of Ideals to Relationship Satisfaction: A Path Analysis Using Dyadic Data. American Journal of Applied Psychology. 2017; 5(1):12-17. doi: 10.12691/ajap-5-1-3

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to develop, using the ideal standards model (with its five dimensions: warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, status-resources, intimacy-loyalty and passion) and dyadic data analysis, a complex model assessing the relationship between perceived ideal similarity and relationship satisfaction. Material and Methods: Couples completed measures about perceived ideal similarity, communication about ideals, importance of ideals, perception of the current partner/relationship, coping strategies used when the partner/relationship is less than ideal and relationship satisfaction. Results: The fit indices for the proposed models are very good (GFI > .90, AGFI > .90, CFI > .90, RMSEA < .08, NFI > .90, CFI>.90) with the exception of status-resources dimension. As a result, it was eliminated from the analysis. Perceived similarity of ideals led to own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, and passion) and partner (intimacy-loyalty) communication about those ideals. More communication about ideals led to own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, intimacy-loyalty) and partner (warmth-trustworthiness, passion) increased real-ideal discrepancy scores. These, in turn, motivated own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, intimacy-loyalty, passion) and partner (intimacy-loyalty) use of coping strategies to manage the discrepancies between actual and ideal partner/relationship. The use of coping strategies led to higher rate regarding own (warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, intimacy-loyalty, passion) and partner (intimacy-loyalty, passion) relationship satisfaction. Conclusions: Given the importance that ideal standards play in relationship/partner evaluation, it could be helpful to shed light on the processes that have an impact on relationships improving/deteriorating over time. Thus, the impact of perceived ideal similarity on marital satisfaction could be of particular interest.

Keywords:
ideal standards model dyadic data analysis perceived ideal similarity communication about ideals real-ideal discrepancies coping strategies relationship satisfaction

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Alexander, A. L., "Relationship resources for coping with unfulfilled standards in dating relationships: Commitment, satisfaction, and closeness", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(5), 725-747, 2008.
[2]	Bodenman, G., Meuwly, N. and Kayser, K., "Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being: A comparison", European Psychologist, 16 (4), 255-266, 2011.
[3]	Campbell L., Overall, N.C., Rubin, H. and Lackenbauer, S.D., "Inferring a partner's ideal discrepancies: accuracy, projection, and the communicative role of interpersonal behavior", J Pers Soc Psychol., 105 (2): 217-33, Aug 2013.
[4]	Campbell, L., Chin, K. and Stanton, S. C. E., "Initial Evidence that Individuals Form New Relationships with Partners that More Closely Match their Ideal Preferences", Collabra, 2(1): 2, 1-7, 2016.
[5]	Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A. and Fletcher, G. J. O., "Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447-462, 2001.
[6]	Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., Mathews, A. and Braitman, A. L., "Why does someone reveal highly personal information? Attributions for and against self-disclosure in close relationships", Communication Research Reports, 25 (2), 115-130, 2008.
[7]	Eastwick, P. W. and Neff, L. A. "Do ideal partner preferences predict divorce? A tale of two metrics", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 667-674, 2012.
[8]	Fletcher, G. J. O., Kerr, P. S. G., Li, N. P. and Valentine, K. A., "Predicting Romantic Interest and Decisions in the Very Early Stages of Mate Selection: Standards, Accuracy, and Sex Differences", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40 (4), 540-550, 2014.
[9]	Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G. and Giles, L., "Ideals in intimate relationships", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72-89, 1999.
[10]	Fletcher, G. J. O. and Simpson, J. A., "Ideal Standards in Close Relationships: Their Structure and Functions", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9 (3), 102-105, 2000.
[11]	Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A. and Thomas, G., "Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 933-940, 2000.
[12]	Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B. and Bradbury, T., "Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (1), 34-48, 2007.
[13]	Greene, K., Derlega, V. J. and Mathews, A., "Self-disclosure in personal relationships". In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 409-427.
[14]	Humbad, M. N., Donnellan, M. B., Iacono, W. G., McGue, M. and Burt, S. A., "Is spousal similarity for personality a matter of convergence or selection?", Personality and Individual Differences, 49 (7), 827-830, 2010
[15]	Lackenbauer, S. D. and Campbell, L., "Measuring Up: The Unique Emotional and Regulatory Outcomes of Different Perceived Partner-Ideal Discrepancies in Romantic Relationships", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (3), 472-488, 2012.
[16]	Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S. and Kirchner, J., "Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25 (6), 889-922, 2008.
[17]	Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O. and Simpson, J., "Regulation Processess in Intimate Relationships: The Role of Ideal Standards", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (4), 662-685, 2006.
[18]	Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. and Sibley, C. G., "Regulating Partners in Intimate Relationships: The Costs and Benefits of Different Communication Strategies", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (3), 620-639, 2009.
[19]	Papp, L. M. and Witt, N. L., "Romantic partners' individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning", Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 551-559, 2010.
[20]	Rodriguez, L. M., Hadden, B. W. and Knee, C. R., "Not all ideals are equal: Intrinsic and extrinsic ideals in relationships", Personal Relationships, 22, 138-152, 2015.
[21]	Spanier, G. B., "Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads", Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28, 1976.
[22]	Strauss, C., Morry, M. M. and Kito, M. "Attachment styles and relationship quality: Actual, perceived, and ideal partner matching", Personal Relationships, 19, 14-36, 2012.
[23]	Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W. and Finkel, E. J. "Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm". Personal Relationships, 20, 199-215, 2013
[24]	Vangelisti, A. L. and Daly, J. A. "Gender differences in standards for romantic relationships", Personal Relationships, 4, 203-219, 1997.
[25]	Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. and Ducat, W. "Positive and negative romantic relationship quality: Age, familiarity, attachment and well-being as correlates of couple agreement and projection", Journal of Adolescence, 33, 879-890, 2010.