World Journal of Agricultural Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-0643 ISSN (Online): 2333-0678 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/wjar Editor-in-chief: Rener Luciano de Souza Ferraz
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2026, 14(2), 74-80
DOI: 10.12691/wjar-14-2-6
Open AccessArticle

Experimental and CFD-DPM Evaluation of Crosswind-Induced Spray Deposition from a Flat-Fan Nozzle

Zhang Huang1,

1Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

Pub. Date: October 26, 2026

Cite this paper:
Zhang Huang. Experimental and CFD-DPM Evaluation of Crosswind-Induced Spray Deposition from a Flat-Fan Nozzle. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2026; 14(2):74-80. doi: 10.12691/wjar-14-2-6

Abstract

Crosswind can displace agricultural spray droplets from their intended target and alter both ground deposition and the vertical distribution of airborne droplets. This study developed a transient computational fluid dynamics-discrete phase model (CFD-DPM) for a single ST110-03 flat-fan nozzle and evaluated its deposition trends against controlled indoor experiments. Two nozzle heights (0.875 and 1.25 m), three crosswind speeds (2, 3, and 4 m s⁻¹), and a spray pressure of 0.4 MPa were investigated. Ground collectors quantified downwind deposition, while five cotton strings placed 2 m downstream at heights of 0.40-0.80 m characterized vertical interception. Ground-collector trials were conducted for 10 min per run, whereas cotton-string sampling used 60 s exposures; each tested experimental condition was independently repeated three times. The CFD domain was 7 m × 2 m × 2 m and contained approximately 1.98 million tetrahedral cells. A realizable k-ε model described the continuous phase, and the measured spray was represented by nine fan directions and three droplet groups (75.29, 206.23, and 336.57 μm). Droplets were injected for 20 s and tracked to 22 s. At a nozzle height of 1.25 m, the measured ground drift fraction increased from 25.57% to 43.31% as crosswind speed increased, while the simulated fraction increased from 42.04% to 51.73%. Across five matched ground cases, experimental and simulated fractions were strongly correlated (r = 0.922), although the mean absolute error was 16.39 percentage points. The model reproduced several vertical-distribution tendencies but substantially overpredicted cotton-string capture in selected cases. The model is therefore suitable for qualitative interpretation and relative trend analysis, but its simplified angular injection and ideal trapping boundaries require refinement before quantitative prediction.

Keywords:
spray drift crosswind CFD-DPM flat-fan nozzle droplet deposition cotton-string sampling

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Pan, X., Yang, S., Gao, Y., et al., “Evaluation of Spray Drift from an Electric Boom Sprayer: Impact of Boom Height and Nozzle Type,” Agronomy, 15(1), 160, January 2025.
 
[2]  Gil, E., Gallart, M., Balsari, P., et al., “Influence of wind velocity and wind direction on measurements of spray drift potential of boom sprayers using drift test bench,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 202, 94-101, March 2015.
 
[3]  Balsari, P., Gil, E., Marucco, P., van de Zande, J.C., Nuyttens, D., Herbst, A. and Gallart, M., “Field-crop-sprayer potential drift measured using test bench: Effects of boom height and nozzle type,” Biosystems Engineering, 154, 3-13, February 2017.
 
[4]  Nuyttens, D., De Schampheleire, M., Baetens, K. and Sonck, B., “The influence of operator-controlled variables on spray drift from field crop sprayers,” Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), 1129-1140, 2007.
 
[5]  Baetens, K., Nuyttens, D., Verboven, P., De Schampheleire, M., Nicolaï, B. and Ramon, H., “Predicting drift from field spraying by means of a 3D computational fluid dynamics model,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 56(2), 161-173, 2007.
 
[6]  Baetens, K., Ho, Q.T., Nuyttens, D., De Schampheleire, M., Endalew, A.M., Hertog, M.L.A.T.M., Nicolai, B., Ramon, H. and Verboven, P., “A validated 2-D diffusion-advection model for prediction of drift from ground boom sprayers,” Atmospheric Environment, 43(9), 1674-1682, March 2009.
 
[7]  Lebeau, F., Verstraete, A., Stainier, C. and Destain, M.F., “RTDrift: A real time model for estimating spray drift from ground applications,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 77(2), 161-174, 2011.
 
[8]  Løfstrøm, P., Bruus, M., Andersen, H.V., Kjær, C., Nuyttens, D. and Astrup, P., “The OML-SprayDrift model for predicting pesticide drift and deposition from ground boom sprayers,” Journal of Pesticide Science, 38(3), 129-138, 2013.
 
[9]  Renaudo, C.A., Bertin, D.E. and Bucalá, V., “A coupled atomization-spray drift model as online support tool for boom spray applications,” Precision Agriculture, 23(6), 2345-2371, 2022.
 
[10]  Renaudo, C.A., Bertin, D.E. and Bucalá, V., “A hybrid Lagrangian-dispersion model for spray drift prediction applied to horizontal boom sprayers,” Journal of Aerosol Science, 173, 106210, 2023.
 
[11]  Cerruto, E., Manetto, G., Papa, R. and Longo, D., “Modelling Spray Pressure Effects on Droplet Size Distribution from Agricultural Nozzles,” Applied Sciences, 11(19), 9283, October 2021.
 
[12]  Musiu, E.M., Qi, L. and Wu, Y., “Evaluation of droplets size distribution and velocity pattern using Computational Fluid Dynamics modelling,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 164, 104886, 2019.
 
[13]  Renaudo, C.A., Bucalá, V. and Bertin, D.E., “Droplet deposition of agrochemical spraying: Comparison of results from a random-walk model and CFD simulations,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 102(8), 2682-2694, 2024.
 
[14]  Butler Ellis, M.C., Alanis, R., Lane, A.G., Tuck, C.R., Nuyttens, D. and van de Zande, J.C., “Wind tunnel measurements and model predictions for estimating spray drift reduction under field conditions,” Biosystems Engineering, 154, 25-34, February 2017.
 
[15]  De Cock, N., Massinon, M., Salah, S.O.T. and Lebeau, F., “Investigation on optimal spray properties for ground based agricultural applications using deposition and retention models,” Biosystems Engineering, 162, 99-111, 2017.
 
[16]  Zhu, H., Reichard, D.L., Fox, R.D., Ozkan, H.E. and Brazee, R.D., “DRIFTSIM, A Program to Estimate Drift Distances of Spray Droplets,” Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 11(3), 365-369, 1995.
 
[17]  Teske, M.E., Miller, P.C.H., Thistle, H.W. and Birchfield, N.B., “Initial development and validation of a mechanistic spray drift model for ground boom sprayers,” Transactions of the ASABE, 52(4), 1089-1097, 2009.