Action Mechanism and Immunity Status of Broiler Chickens after Spray and Drinking Water Administration of Kanne-Brottrunk®

Raheel I.A.¹, Orabi A.^2, , Saber El-Hanbaly³ and Hassan Shaheen⁴

¹Department of Bacteriology, Mycology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suief University, Egypt

²Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

³Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Egypt

⁴Veterinarian in Egyptian Livestock Production Field

Cite this paper:
Raheel I.A., Orabi A., Saber El-Hanbaly and Hassan Shaheen. Action Mechanism and Immunity Status of Broiler Chickens after Spray and Drinking Water Administration of Kanne-Brottrunk®. Journal of Applied & Environmental Microbiology. 2018; 6(3):59-66. doi: 10.12691/jaem-6-3-1

Abstract

Poultry producers are challenged to improve production while using fewer antibiotics due to increased restriction on antimicrobial usage so prebiotics and probiotics are being tested under different experimental conditions to study the pathways used by these substances to assist in the prevention of carcass contamination and in the elimination of pathogens present in the bird's organisms. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of spray and orally administered Kanne-Brottrunk® which contain Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium at which lactic acids bacteria concentration is 5x10⁶ cfu/ml in addition to vitamins, minerals, essential amino acids and trace elements on the mucosal trachea IgA, IL-6 and INF-γ as well as healthiness of intestinal and tracheal mucosa using electron microscopy. Six hundred one day old Cobb broilers chickens were reared on litter in three separated groups each one contain 200 chicks, 1^st group "Drinking Water Administrated", 2^ndgroup "Spray Administrated" and "control non Kanne-Brottrunk® medicated group". Serum, trachea and intestine collected for evaluation of immune status and epithelium healthiness at 14, 21, 28 and 35 day old. Immunological Parameters measured were IL-6, INF-γ and Mucosal IgA concentration using EISA kits accompanied by tracheal and intestinal electron microscopy histomorphology. The results proved that Kanne-Brottrunk® administrated in water stimulate immune response by increased level of IL-6, INF-γ and Mucosal IgA and also increase immune cells infiltration as plasma cell, lymphoid cells, macrophages, and heterophile in trachea and intestine with protection of their tracheal cilia and intestinal villi more than aerosol administration.

Keywords:
Kanne-Brottrunk® IL-6 INF-γ Mucosal IgA electron microscope

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	FAO/WHO. 2001. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[2]	Vanbelle M, Teller E, Focant M. 1990. Probiotics in animal nutrition: a review. Arch Tierernahr. 40: 543-567.
[3]	Bai, S., Wu, A., Ding, X., Lei, Y., Bai, J., Zhang, K., and Chio, j. 2013. Effects of probiotics supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broilers chickens. Poultry sci. 92(3): 663-670.
[4]	Kalyuzhny, A.E.2005. Chemistry and biology of ELISPOT assay. Methods. Mol. Biol (Clifton, Nj ). 302: 15-31.
[5]	Karakolev, R.; Gospodinova, K.; Sotirov, L.; Nikolov, D.; Angelov, A. and Koynarski, Ts.(2015): Blood serum interferon- alpha and - gamma concentrations in broiler chickens treated with the immunomodulator Helpankar. Int. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 4(10): 296-299.
[6]	Guillermo Tellez, Rubén Merino Guzmán, Juan David Latorre,Ramiro Delgado Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco, Amanda Desha Wolfenden, Kyle Dean Teague, Lucas Elzie Graham, Brittany Danielle Mahaffey, Mikayla Francis AnnBaxter, Billy and, Marshall Hargis, 2017: Comparison of total immunoglobulin A levels in different samples in Leghorn and broiler chickens. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, Volume 7, Issue 2, February 2017, Pages 116-120.
[7]	Bozzola. J. and Russell, L. 1991. Electron microseopy principles and techniques for biologists: Jones and Bartlitt publishers 20 park plasa Boston Ma o 2116.
[8]	Landy,N. and Kavyani,A.2013.Effects of using a multi-strain probiotic on performance,immune system and caecal microflora composition in broiler chickens reared under cyclic heat stress condition. Iranian journal of Applied Animal science. 3(4): 703-708.
[9]	Abdel-Rhman, H., Shawky, S., Ouda, H., Nafeaa, A., Orabi, S.2-13. Effect of two probiotics and bioflavonoids supplementation to the broilers diet and drinking water on the growth performance and hepatic antioxidant parameters. Global Veterinaria. 10(6): 734-741.
[10]	Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concepts of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition 1995; 125(6): 1401-1412.
[11]	Iji PA, Tivey DR. Natural and synthetic oligossaccharides in broiler chickens diets. World’s Poultry Science Journal 1998; 54: 129-143.
[12]	Furlan RL. Avaliaçمo e uso de pré e probiَticos. 6° Simpَsio Brasil Sul de Avicultura; 2005; Chapecَ, Santa Catarina. Brasil. p. 58-76.
[13]	BuyseJ, Adelson DS, Decuypere E, Scanes GC.1993.Diurnal-nocturnal changes in food intake,gut storage of ingesta,food transit time and metabolism in growing broilers chickens:a model for temporal control of energy balance.. Poultry sci.34: 699-706.
[14]	Erickson, K.L. and Hubbbard, N.E. (2000). Probiotics immunomodulation in health and diseases. The journals of Nutrition.Vol.130, No.2. Feb 2000. PP. 403-409.
[15]	Menten, J.F.M. and Loddi, M.M. 2003. Probioticos, prebioticos e aditivos fitogenicos na nutricao de aves. Proceedings of simposio de nurticao de aves e suinos, Campinas, Sao Paulo, PP. 107-138.
[16]	Loddi, M.M. 2003. Probioticos, prebioticos e acidificants orgnicos em dietas para frangos de corte.52f. Tese (Doutorado em Zootecnia)-Fuculdade de Ciencias Agrarias e Veterinarias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho", Jaboticabal.
[17]	Nunes, A.D. 2008. Influencia do uso de aditivos alternativos a antimicrobians sobre o desempenho,morfologia intestinal e immunidade de frangos de cote.111f. Dissertacao(Mestrado em Medicina Veterinaria), Faculadade de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootcnia, Universidade de Sao Paulo.
[18]	Galdeano. C.M. and Perdigon, G. 2006. The probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus casei induce activation of the gut mucosal immune system through innate immunity. Clinical vaccine immunology. 13(2): 219-226.
[19]	Pagnini, C., Saeed, R., Bamias, G., Arseneau, K.O., Pizarro, T.T., and Cominelli, F. 2010. Probiotics promote gut health through stimulation of epithelial innate immunity proceeding of the national academy science of the united state of America, 107(1): 454-459.
[20]	Sato, K., Takahashi, K., Tohno, M., Miura, Y., Kamada, T., Ikegami, S. and Kitazawa, H. 2009. Immunomodulation in gut associated lymphoid tissue of neonatal chicks by immunobiotic diets.
[21]	Zhang, Z. and Kim, I. 2014. Effects of multistrain probiotics on growth performance apparent ileal nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, ceacal microbial shedding and excreta odor contents of broilers.. Poultry sci.92 (3): 364-370.
[22]	Dhama K and Singh S D. (2010). Probiotics improving poultry health and production: an overview. Poultry Punch, 26(3): 41.
[23]	Wolfenden A D, Vicente J L, Higgins J P, Andreatti R, Higgins S E, Hargis B M and Tellez G. (2007). Effect of organic acids and probiotics on Salmonella Enteritidis infection in broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 6: 403-405.
[24]	Hajati H and Rezaei M. (2010). The application of probiotics in poultry production. Inter. J. Poult. Sci., 9: 298-304.
[25]	Mason C K, Collins M A and Thompson K. (2005). Modified electroporation protocol for lactobacilli isolated from the chicken crop facilitates transformation and the use of genetic tool. J. Microbiol. Methods, 60: 353-363.