Changes of the Surfaces of Various Metal Implants after Introduction into Rabbits’ Bone Tissue

M.S. Toder¹, A.I. Shevela^2, , A.A. Shevela^{1, 3}, P.A. Zheleznyi³, A.P. Zheleznaia³ and I.V. Mayborodin²

¹International Center of implantology of iDent, Novosibirsk, Russia

²Center of new medical technologies of Institute of chemical biology and fundamental medicine of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

³Novosibirsk state medical university, Russia

Cite this paper:
M.S. Toder, A.I. Shevela, A.A. Shevela, P.A. Zheleznyi, A.P. Zheleznaia and I.V. Mayborodin. Changes of the Surfaces of Various Metal Implants after Introduction into Rabbits’ Bone Tissue. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2016; 4(3):38-41. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-4-3-2

Abstract

Screw metal implants with rough or the smooth polished were introduced surface in a tibial bone proximal condyle of not purebred rabbits. Within 6 months after operation the considerable distinctions of radiological data were revealed not. 2 months later after introduction of implants with a rough surface the effort enclosed for its twisting is, much more, than for removal of the polished product. However, stability of fixing of implants was practically made even at 6 months. On remote rough implants there is a set of tissue scraps whereas on products with a smooth surface the tissue remains were much less. Surrounding tissues strongly join a rough surface, grow into cavities, and during removal of such products there is a considerable trauma of tissues round an implantation place. Smooth implants have the smaller area of contact with organism tissues, they are fixed due to bicortical implantation, during removal easily get out and don't break off surrounding tissues.

Keywords:
screw metal dentistry implants into bone implantation durability of implant fixing features of implant removal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Günter W.E., Dambayev G.Ts., Sysolyatin P.G., etc. Medical materials and implants with shape memory. Tomsk: Publishing house Tomsk un-that, 1998. 487 p.
[2]	Maĭborodin I.V., Iakushenko V.K., Maĭborodina V.I. Interaction of nickelide-titanium implant with tissues in human. Arkh Patol. 2002, vol. 64, № 2, p. 50-52.
[3]	Maĭborodin I.V., Shevela A.I., Matveeva V.A. et al. Morphological tissue changes after the implantation of elastic lamellar foreign bodies in the experiment. Morfologiia. 2012, vol. 141, № 2, p. 54-60.
[4]	Maiborodin I.V., Kuznetsova I.V., Beregovoy E.A. et al. Tissue reactions during the degradation of polylactide implants in the body. Morfologiia. 2013, vol. 143, № 3, p. 59-65.
[5]	Maĭborodin I.V., Shevela A.I., Kuznetsova I.V. et al. Tissue responses to silicone materials in the body. Arkh Patol. 2013, vol. 75, № 4, p. 28-33.