Doctor of Nursing Practice Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Use in Nursing Education: A Qualitative Approach

Jill Kardously^1, , Kholoud Hardan-Khalil¹, Michael Williams¹ and Samantha Wee¹

¹School of Nursing, California State University, Long Beach, USA

Cite this paper:
Jill Kardously, Kholoud Hardan-Khalil, Michael Williams and Samantha Wee. Doctor of Nursing Practice Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Use in Nursing Education: A Qualitative Approach. American Journal of Nursing Research. 2026; 14(2):20-26. doi: 10.12691/ajnr-14-2-1

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly integrated into higher education and healthcare environments, raising important ethical considerations for nursing education. AI tools can enhance learning and productivity; however, their use presents concerns regarding academic integrity, critical thinking, and responsible application in professional nursing practice. Aim: This qualitative study explored Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) to Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence use and ethical considerations within nursing education. A descriptive qualitative design using focus group methodology was employed. Methods: Twenty-eight BSN to DNP students from a large metropolitan university participated in three focus groups. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview guide and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Four overarching themes emerged: (1) AI as a supportive learning tool, (2) ethical concerns related to academic integrity and over-reliance, (3) lack of institutional guidance regarding AI use, and (4) the need to prepare future nurses for AI-integrated healthcare environments. Participants viewed AI as a valuable academic support tool but emphasized the importance of maintaining critical thinking and professional judgment. Students also expressed uncertainty about acceptable AI use due to inconsistent faculty guidance. Conclusions: Findings suggest that nursing education programs should develop clearer policies and provide structured instruction on ethical AI use. Integrating AI literacy into nursing curricula may help prepare future nurses to engage responsibly with emerging technologies while maintaining the ethical standards central to nursing practice.

Keywords:
Qualitative research focus group artificial intelligence doctoral nursing education ethical utilization

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Al Kuwaiti A, Nazer K, Al-Reedy A, Al-Shehri S, Al-Muhanna A, Subbarayalu AV, Al Muhanna D, Al-Muhanna FA. A review of the role of artificial intelligence in healthcare. J Pers Med. 2023; 13(6): 951.
[2]	Gu J, Gao C, Wang L. The evolution of artificial intelligence in biomedicine: Bibliometric analysis. JMIR AI. 2023; 2: e45770.
[3]	Brunner J, Amano A, Davila J, Krein S, Sullivan SC, Church V, Sayre G, Rinne ST. Nurse experiences in an electronic health record transition. Comput Inform Nurs. 2025; 43(4): 1239.
[4]	American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. 2021. Available from: .
[5]	De Gagne JC. The state of artificial intelligence in nursing education: Past, present, and future directions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(6): 4884.
[6]	Goktas P, Kucukkaya A, Karacay P. Leveraging the efficiency and transparency of artificial intelligence-driven visual Chatbot through smart prompt learning concept. Skin Res Technol. 2023; 29(11): 13417.
[7]	Shi J, Wei S, Gao Z, Mei Y, Tian F, Zhao J, Li Z. Global output on artificial intelligence in the field of nursing: A bibliometric analysis and science mapping. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2022; 54(6): 853-863.
[8]	Hobensack M, Michalowski M, Mitchell J, Nibber R, Olalia MA, Pruinelli L, Ronquillo CE, Topaz M, Peltonen LM. Artificial intelligence-based technologies in nursing: A scoping literature review of the evidence. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022; 127: 104153.
[9]	Shuhaiber A, Kuhail MA, Salman S. ChatGPT in higher education: A student’s perspective. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2025; 17: 100565.
[10]	Wang Z, Yin Z, Zheng Y, Li X, Zhang L. Will graduate students engage in unethical uses of GPT? An exploratory study to understand their perceptions. Educ Technol Soc. 2025; 28(1): 286-300.
[11]	Lund BD, Lee TH, Mannuru NR, Aratula N. AI and academic integrity: Exploring student perceptions and implications for higher education. J Acad Ethics. 2025; 23(3): 1554-1565.
[12]	Higgins O, Chalup SK, Wilson RL. Artificial intelligence in nursing: Trustworthy or reliable? J Res Nurs. 2024; 29(2): 143-153.
[13]	Kannelönning MS. Contesting futures of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare: Formal expectations meet informal anticipations. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2024; 36(11): 3845-3856.
[14]	Labrague LJ, Aguilar-Rosales R, Yboa BC, Sabio JB, de los Santos JA. Student nurses’ attitudes, perceived utilization, and intention to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) technology in nursing practice: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023; 73: 103815.
[15]	El Arab RAA, Al Moosa OA. Systematic review of cost effectiveness and budget impact of artificial intelligence in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8: 548.
[16]	Porcellato L, Lanera E, Ocagli H, Daniels M. Exploring applications of artificial intelligence in critical care nursing: A systematic review. Nurs Rep. 2025; 15(2): 55.
[17]	Palmer SJ. Artificial intelligence in primary and community care: Opportunities and challenges. Br J Community Nurs. 2025; 30(Suppl 9): 137.
[18]	Montejo L, Fenton A, Davis G. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare and considerations for nursing education. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024; 80: 104158.
[19]	Srinivasan M, Venugopal A, Venkatesan L, Kumar R. Navigating the pedagogical landscape: Exploring the implications of AI and chatbots in nursing education. JMIR Nurs. 2024; 7: e52105.
[20]	Abujaber A, Abd-Alrazaq A, Al-Qudimat AR, et al. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of ChatGPT integration in nursing education: A narrative review. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e48643.
[21]	Harder N, Ali F, Turner S, Workum K, Gillman L. Comparing artificial intelligence-enhanced virtual reality and simulated patient simulations in undergraduate nursing education. Clin Simul Nurs. 2025; 105: 1017800.
[22]	Kim TW. Application of artificial intelligence chatbots, including ChatGPT, in education, scholarly work, programming, and content generation and its prospects: A narrative review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023; 20: 38.
[23]	Tseng LP, Huang LP, Chen WR. Exploring artificial intelligence literacy and the use of ChatGPT and copilot in instruction on nursing academic report writing. Nurse Educ Today. 2025; 147: 106570.
[24]	Topaz M, Peltonen LM, Michalowski M, Stiglic G, Ronquillo C, Pruinelli L, Song J, O’Connor S, Miyagawa S, Fukahori H. The ChatGPT effect: Nursing education and generative artificial intelligence. J Nurs Educ. 2025; 64(6): 20240126-01.
[25]	Matthias AD, Hundt B, Craig S, Lee JL. A blueprint for integrating nursing history: Performance indicators for competency-based education. J Prof Nurs. 2025; 56: 49-53.
[26]	Mani ZA. Transitioning to competency-based education in nursing: A scoping review of curriculum review and revision strategies. BMC Nurs. 2025; 24: 111.
[27]	Swan BA. Assessing the knowledge and attitudes of registered nurses about artificial intelligence in nursing and health care. Nurs Econ. 2021; 39(3): 139-143.
[28]	Saleh ZT, Rababa M, Elshatarat RA, Alharbi M, Alhumaidi B, Al-Za’areer MS, Jarrad RA, Niarat TF, Almagharbeh WT, Al-Sayaghi KM, Fadila DE. Exploring faculty perceptions and concerns regarding artificial intelligence chatbots in nursing education: Potential benefits and limitations. BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1): 3082-0.
[29]	Sun G, Hoelscher S. The ChatGPT storm and what faculty can do. Nurse Educ. 2023; 48(3): 119-124.
[30]	Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, eds. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1978: 48-71.