Nurse Management of Radial Arterial Lines: Quality & Safety

Nancy P. Hanrahan^1, , Lisa Letourneau² and Rachel Batty³

¹Chief Science Officer, Nurse Approved, LLC, 112 Spring Lane, Rockport, Maine

²Critical Care Nurse, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI

³Workplace Safety & Insurance Board, 180 Kent Street, Suite 400, Ottawa, Ontario K1P

Cite this paper:
Nancy P. Hanrahan, Lisa Letourneau and Rachel Batty. Nurse Management of Radial Arterial Lines: Quality & Safety. American Journal of Nursing Research. 2022; 10(1):7-15. doi: 10.12691/ajnr-10-1-2

Abstract

Background: Radial arterial lines (RALs) are used to obtain precise measurement and provide continuous blood pressure monitoring of critically ill patients. Critical care nurses are the primary responsible clinician for maintaining the safety and effectiveness of radial arterial lines (RALs). Gaps exist in the practice literature about tools that help nurses stabilize the wrist joint for safe maintenance of RALs. Local Problem: The purpose of this study was to improve the quality and safety of RALs by establishing use, safety, and preferences of critical care nurses for tools that help them manage RALs. Methods/Intervention: A mix method approach provided in-depth qualitative and quantitative data in two phases: Phase I: Survey of critical care nurse management of RALs and Phase II: a Focus Group of Critical Care Nurse Experts exploring the use, safety, and perception of tools to manage RALs. Results: Nurses reported that visual inspection of the insertion site of an RAL (97.1%); adjustment of the wrist angle (98.5%) and stabilization of the wrist (88.2%) were critical areas for safe management. Nurses voiced concern about the lack of the availability of adequate tools to manage RAL. Conclusions: Too often the nurses' jury rig devices to stabilize a patient’s wrist and the nurses reported frequent adverse events such as infections, skin breakdown, and inaccurate blood pressure measurements. These outcomes are costly for hospitals and patients. Nurses reported preference for flexible/bendable armboards, but they were reported often not available. Nurses need up-to-date tools to perform best practices that keep patients safe.

Keywords:
radial arterial lines quality improvement nurse management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Hager HH, Bracken Burns. Artery Cannulation. Nih.gov. Published November 16, 2020. Accessed February 28, 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482242/.
[2]	Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review: Complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Critical Care. 2002; 6(3): 199.
[3]	Berg K, Riesenberg LA, Berg D, et al. The Development of a Validated Checklist for Radial Arterial Line Placement. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2013; 29(3): 242-246.
[4]	Phillips LD, Gorski LA. Manual of I.V. Therapeutics : Evidence-Based Practice for Infusion Therapy. F.A. Davis Company; 2014.
[5]	Pandey R, Ashraf H, Bhalla AP, Garg R. Optimal wrist angulation shortens time needed for radial artery catheterization: a prospective, randomized, and blinded study. Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica. 2012; 63(4). Accessed February 28, 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23610857/.
[6]	Cousins TR; O'Donnell JM. Arterial cannulation: a critical review. AANA journal. 2004; 72(4). Accessed February 28, 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15354915/.
[7]	Greer M, Carney S, McPheeters R, Aguiniga P, Rubio S, Lee J. Radial Arterial Lines Have a Higher Failure Rate than Femoral. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 19(2): 364-371.
[8]	Mizukoshi K, Shibasaki M, Amaya F, et al. Ultrasound evidence of the optimal wrist position for radial artery cannulation. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie. 2009; 56(6): 427-431.
[9]	Ogle S. Arterial Line Placement: Background, Indications, Contraindications. Medscape.com. Published July 7, 2020. Accessed February 28, 2021. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1999586-overview#a4.
[10]	Saugel B, Kouz K, Meidert AS, Schulte-Uentrop L, Romagnoli S. How to measure blood pressure using an arterial catheter: a systematic 5-step approach. Critical Care. 2020; 24(1).
[11]	Dursun Ergezen F, Kol E. Nurses’ responses to monitor alarms in an intensive care unit: An observational study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2020; 59: 102845.
[12]	Pierre L, Divij Pasrija, Keenaghan M. Arterial Lines. Nih.gov. Published August 2021. Accessed November 16, 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499989/.
[13]	Greer M, Carney S, McPheeters R, Aguiniga P, Rubio S, Lee J. Radial Arterial Lines Have a Higher Failure Rate than Femoral. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 19(2): 364-371.
[14]	O'grady N, Alexander M, Burns L, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, 2011; 2011. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/pdf/guidelines/bsi-guidelines-H.pdf.
[15]	Crick JM. Qualitative research in marketing: what can academics do better? Journal of Strategic Marketing. 2020; 29(5): 390-429.
[16]	Akl KF. Misuse of the wooden tongue depressor. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2010; 77(5): 579-579.
[17]	Eisen LA, Minami T, Berger JS, Sekiguchi H, Mayo PH, Narasimhan M. Gender Disparity in Failure Rate for Arterial Catheter Attempts. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2007; 22(3): 166-172.
[18]	Leeming J, Moss H, Elliott T. Risk of tongue depressors to the immunocompromised. The Lancet. 1996; 348(9031): 889.
[19]	Hyde KF. Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. 2000; 3(2): 82-90.