Comparing Accuracy of Manual Triage with Electronic Triage System

Wael N. Eid^1, and Hussein M Borie²

¹Emergency Department, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

²Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Cite this paper:
Wael N. Eid and Hussein M Borie. Comparing Accuracy of Manual Triage with Electronic Triage System. American Journal of Nursing Research. 2021; 9(3):71-75. doi: 10.12691/ajnr-9-3-1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Triage is the process of sorting patients in the emergency department (ED) based on the severity of their clinical presentation. There are several protocols to categorize patients and provide order in which and where a patient will be seen in the ED. It is a useful tool for organization and managing resources in the ED. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to compare the accuracy and applicability of the electronic Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to the manual CTAS system. DESIGN: It is a descriptive, analytical prospective study that was conducted in King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC), Makkah, Saudi Arabia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: During the study period, 389 patients were triaged with both manual and electronic CTAS triaging systems. RESULTS: Our research shows a low strength of agreement between manual and electronic triaging systems. The scores differ significantly that we cannot interpret the accuracy between the two systems. Additionally, our study shows that the predominant triaging score was CTAS 3 in both electronic and manual triaging systems and this could reflect the higher acuity of patient presentations to KAMC ED. KAMC is a specialized tertiary care center where patients frequently require a higher level of care. CONCLUSION: Our research demonstrates the potentials of improving the triage process in the ED. Furthermore, this research highlighted the higher acuity of patients presented to KAMC ED and we believe this can give insight and further guidance for staffing, type, and the number of beds needed for our ED. However, further studies are needed to compare the electronic versus the manual triaging systems regarding the time required for completing the triage, impact of bed occupancy at the time of triage, as well as the number of staff available.

Keywords:
manual triage electronic triage system

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Robertson-Steel, I. (2006). Evolution of triage systems. Emergency Medicine Journal, 23(2), pp.154-155.
[2]	Beveridge et al. Implementation Guidelines for the Canadian Emergen.pdf’ (1999). Available at: https://ctas-phctas.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ctased16_98.pdf (Accessed: 3 January 2021).
[3]	Bullard J, et al. (2017). Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines 2016. CJEM, 19(S2), pp. S18-S27.
[4]	Henning E, et al. (2020). Digital versus analogue record systems for mass casualty incidents at sea—Results from an exploratory study. PLOS ONE. Edited by H.-P. Simmen, 15(6), p. e0234156.
[5]	Linder F, et all (2019). Better compliance with triage criteria in trauma would reduce costs with maintained patient safety. European journal of emergency medicine, 26(4), 283.‏
[6]	Alquraini, M., Awad, E., & Hijazi, R. E. (2015). Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia. International journal of emergency medicine, 8(1), 1-4.
[7]	Beveridge R, et al. (1999). Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 34(2), pp. 155-159.
[8]	Arafat A, et all. (2016). Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in an Urgent Care Center in Saudi Arabia, International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 9(1), p. 17.
[9]	Jiménez G, et al. (2003). Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators. CJEM, 5(5), pp. 315-322.
[10]	Elkum B, et all. (2011). Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. BMC emergency medicine, 11, p. 3.
[11]	Devkaran, S, et al. (2009). The impact of a fast-track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: a Middle Eastern emergency department perspective. BMC emergency medicine, 9, p. 11.
[12]	Bolduc C, et al. (2018). Comparison of Electronic Versus Manual Mass-Casualty Incident Triage, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 33(3), pp. 273-278.
[13]	Dugas F, et al. (2016). An Electronic Emergency Triage System to Improve Patient Distribution by Critical Outcomes. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 50(6), pp. 910-918.
[14]	Dong L, et al. (2007). The effect of training on nurse agreement using an electronic triage system. CJEM, 9(4), pp. 260-266.