American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2328-4102 ISSN (Online): 2328-4110 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajme Editor-in-chief: Kambiz Ebrahimi, Dr. SRINIVASA VENKATESHAPPA CHIKKOL
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2025, 13(1), 11-20
DOI: 10.12691/ajme-13-1-3
Open AccessArticle

Integrated Optimization Model for Concurrent Tolerancing Allocation and Alternative Manufacturing Process Selection

Heping Peng1, , Zhuoqun Peng2 and Qianpeng Han1

1School of Intelligent Manufacturing, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China

2Wuhan Urban Railway Branch, China Railway Electrification Engineering Group Co., Ltd. Wuhan 430074, China

Pub. Date: October 21, 2025

Cite this paper:
Heping Peng, Zhuoqun Peng and Qianpeng Han. Integrated Optimization Model for Concurrent Tolerancing Allocation and Alternative Manufacturing Process Selection. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2025; 13(1):11-20. doi: 10.12691/ajme-13-1-3

Abstract

Most of the existing concurrent tolerancing methods can only be used to solve optimal tolerance allocation problems under the conditions of given manufacturing processes and economical process tolerance ranges, which are difficult to get the global optimization solutions of process and design tolerances, as well as the most economical processing routes. With the aim to address these shortcomings, an optimization mathematical model was developed in this paper, in which we consider the selection of alternative manufacturing processes by introducing a manufacturing process selection coefficient into the existing concurrent tolerancing model. The recommended model simultaneously allocates the design and process tolerances with alternative machining process selection by minimizing the total cost including the production cost and the expected quality loss, and taking the product function requirements, the economic machining tolerance range for each alternative process operation, and alternative manufacturing process selection as constraints. In order to accurately solve this discrete integrated optimization model, the MATLAB R2016b is adopted as a nonlinear programming technique to achieve the optimization solution of concurrent tolerancing allocation and manufacturing process selection. The numerical example of a gear assembly proves that the proposed model can not only select manufacturing processes but also realize concurrent optimization allocation of tolerances.

Keywords:
Concurrent Tolerancing Quality loss function Alternative manufacturing processes Optimization Process tolerance

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Hallmann M, Schleich B, Wartzack S. From tolerance allocation to tolerance-cost optimization: a comprehensive literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020, 107: 4859-4912.
 
[2]  Ye B, Salustri F A. Simultaneous tolerance synthesis for manufacturing and quality. Res Eng Des, 2003, 14: 98-106.
 
[3]  Jeang A. Combined parameter and tolerance design optimization with quality and cost. Int J Prod Res, 2001, 39 (5): 923-952.
 
[4]  Jeang A, Chung C-P, Hsieh C-K. Simultaneous process mean and process tolerance determination with asymmetrical loss function. Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2007, 31: 694-704.
 
[5]  Peng H P, JiangX Q, Liu X J. Concurrent optimal allocation of design and process tolerances for mechanical assemblies with interrelated dimension chains. Int J Prod Res, 2008, 46 (24): 6963-6979.
 
[6]  Peng H P, Peng Z Q. Concurrent design and process tolerances determination in consideration of geometrical tolerances. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science, 2019, 233 (19-20): 6727-6740.
 
[7]  Janakiraman V, Saravanan R. Concurrent optimization of machining process parameters and tolerance allocation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2010, 51: 357-369.
 
[8]  Lu C, Zhao W H, Yu S J. Concurrent tolerance design for manufacture and assembly with a game theoretic approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2012, 62: 303-316.
 
[9]  Peng H P. Concurrent tolerancing for design and manufacturing based on the present worth of quality loss. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2012, 59: 929-937.
 
[10]  Balamurugan C, Saravanan A, Babu P D, Jagan S, Narasimman S R. Concurrent optimal allocation of geometric and process tolerances based on the present worth of quality loss using evolutionary optimisation techniques. Res Eng Design, 2017, 28: 185-202.
 
[11]  Petrović M, Vuković N, Mitić M, Miljković Z. Integration of process planning and scheduling using chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl, 2016, 64: 569-588.
 
[12]  Yu M R, Yang B, Chen Y. Dynamic integration of process planning and scheduling using a discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm. Adv Prod Eng Manag, 2018, 13 (3): 279-296.
 
[13]  Li X, Gao L, Wang W, Wang C,Wen L. Particle swarm optimization hybridized with genetic algorithm for uncertain integrated process planning and scheduling with interval processing time. Comput Ind Eng, 2019, 135: 1036-1046.
 
[14]  Demir H I, Erden C. Dynamic integrated process planning, scheduling and due-date assignment using ant colony optimization. Comput Ind Eng, 2020, 149: 106799-106806.
 
[15]  Ding L, Yue Y, Ahmet K, Jackson M, Parkin R. Global optimization of a feature-based process sequence using GA and ANN techniques. Int J Prod Res, 2005, 43 (15): 3247-3272.
 
[16]  Yeo S H, Ngoi B K A, Chen H. Process sequence optimization based on a new cost-tolerance model. J Intell Manuf, 1998, 9: 29-37.
 
[17]  Robles N, Roy U. Optimal tolerance allocation and process-sequence selection incorporating manufacturing capacities and quality issues. J Manuf Syst, 2004, 23 (2): 127-133.
 
[18]  Geetha K, Ravindran D, Kumar M S, Islam M N. Concurrent tolerance allocation and scheduling for complex assemblies. Robot Cim-Int Manuf, 2015, 35: 84-95.
 
[19]  Mohapatra P, Nayak A, Kumar S K, Tiwari M K. Multi-objective process planning and scheduling using controlled elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res, 2015, 53 (6): 1712-1735.
 
[20]  Deja M, Siemiatkowski M S. Machining process sequencing and machine assignment in generative feature-based CAPP for mill-turn parts. J Manuf Syst, 2018, 48: 49-62.
 
[21]  Ming X, Mak K. Intelligent approaches to tolerance allocation and manufacturing operations selection in process planning. J Mater Process Tech, 2001, 117: 75-83.
 
[22]  Singh P K, Jain P K, Jain S C. A genetic algorithm-based solution to optimal tolerance synthesis of mechanical assemblies with alternative manufacturing processes: focus on complex tolerancing problems. Int J Prod Res, 2004, 42 (24): 5185-5215.
 
[23]  Kumar M S, Kannan S M, Jayabalan V. A new algorithm for optimum tolerance allocation of complex assemblies with alternative processes selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2009,40: 819-836.
 
[24]  Sivakumar K, Balamurugan C, Ramabalan S. Concurrent multi-objective tolerance allocation of mechanical assemblies considering alternative manufacturing process selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2011, 53: 711-732.
 
[25]  Geetha K, Ravindran D, Kumar M S, Islam M N. Multi-objective optimization for optimum tolerance synthesis with process and machine selection using a genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2013, 67: 2439-2457.
 
[26]  Dong Z, Hu W, Xue D. New production cost-tolerance models for tolerance synthesis. J Eng Indus, 1994, 116: 199-206.
 
[27]  Lee C L, Tang G R. Tolerance design for products with correlated characteristics. Mech Mach Theory, 2000, 35(12): 1675-1687.