World Journal of Agricultural Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-0643 ISSN (Online): 2333-0678 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/wjar Editor-in-chief: Rener Luciano de Souza Ferraz
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2026, 14(1), 18-28
DOI: 10.12691/wjar-14-1-3
Open AccessArticle

Wind‑Induced Drift and Uniformity Control of a Novel Atomizing Nozzle under Low Pressure Sprinkler Irrigation

Yongqiang Zhang1, Xingye Zhu1, , Chenglin Wang1, Sijia Zhu1 and Junping Liu1

1Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

Pub. Date: May 19, 2026

Cite this paper:
Yongqiang Zhang, Xingye Zhu, Chenglin Wang, Sijia Zhu and Junping Liu. Wind‑Induced Drift and Uniformity Control of a Novel Atomizing Nozzle under Low Pressure Sprinkler Irrigation. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2026; 14(1):18-28. doi: 10.12691/wjar-14-1-3

Abstract

Background: Wind speed is a key environmental factor affecting the atomization performance and irrigation quality of sprinkler irrigation systems, with wind‑induced drift and reduced uniformity being particularly prominent under low‑pressure sprin-kler conditions.Methods: To investigate the coupling effects of wind speed, nozzle structural parameters, and operating conditions, this study adopted an L9 (3³) orthogonal experimental design with nozzle orifice diameter (1.0 mm, 1.2 mm, 1.5 mm), operating pressure (0.2 MPa, 0.3 MPa, 0.4 MPa), and wind speed (2 m/s, 4 m/s, 6 m/s) as experimental factors. The effects of these parameters on sprinkler uniformity (Christiansen uniformity coefficient, CU) and drift loss rate under the influence of wind speed were systematically investigated. Results: The results show that wind speed had the most significant effect on sprinkler uniformity: as wind speed increased from 2 m/s to 6 m/s, the average CU decreased by 4.4 percentage points. Under the influence of wind speed, nozzle orifice diameter did not significantly affect the drift loss rate; however, the 1.2 mm diameter exhibited the best balance between uniformity and wind resistance. Operating pressure had a significant effect on drift loss rate: when the pressure increased from 0.2 MPa to 0.4 MPa, the average drift loss rate increased by 5 percentage points, while the improvement in uniformity was limited. The optimal combination of parameters was a nozzle orifice diameter of 1.2 mm, an operating pressure of 0.4 MPa, and a wind speed of 2 m/s. Under this combination, sprinkler uniformity reached 82.06% and the drift loss rate was controlled at 32.46%, achieving an optimal balance between uniformity and anti‑drift performance. Conclusion: This study reveals the coupling effects of wind speed and nozzle structural parameters on atomization performance, clarifies the regulation effects of structural parameters when wind speed changes, and provides a theoretical basis for the optimal selection of sprinkler systems and the configuration of operating parameters under complex wind conditions in the field.

Keywords:
wind speed variation drift loss sprinkler uniformity orthogonal experiment parameter optimization

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 11

References:

[1]  Yang, G.; Li, H.; Zhao, X.; et al.“Optimized Allocation of Irrigation Water Resources Based on Uncertainty: Model Construction and Dynamic Regulation Mechanism.” Water, 18 (5), 612-614. Mar. 2026.
 
[2]  Singh, R.; Nath, P.C.; Praharaj, S.C.; et al. “Conservation Tillage and Sprinkler Irrigation for Sustainable Water Management and Enhanced Crop Yields in Maize and Field Pea Cropping System.” Sci. Rep, 12 (1), 35-37. Mar. 2026.
 
[3]  Chaulagain, K.R.; Ghimire, P.; Ojha, S.; et al. “Simulation and Experimental Investigation of Low-Speed Centrifugal Pump Coupled with Vertical Ultra-Low-Head Turbine for Small-Scale Irrigation.” Eng. Rep, 8 (4), e70653. Apr. 2026.
 
[4]  Wang, X.K.; Wu, W.J.; Meng, T.S.; et al. “Optimization of Internal Driving Structure and Hydraulic Performance of Jet Pulse Sprinkler.” Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng, 42 (2), 150-156. Jan. 2026.
 
[5]  Zhou, X.; Li, H.; Pan, X.W.; et al. “Effect of Sprinkler Rotation Speed and Operating Pressure on Hydraulic Performance of Rotary Sprinkler.” J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng., 43 (12), 1291-1296. Dec. 2025.
 
[6]  Zhao, Y.X.; Liu, J.P.; Zhao, Y.Y.; et al. “Optimization of Structural Parameters of Pressure Regulating Device for Sprinkler Irrigation System.” J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng, 43 (6), 635-641. May. 2025.
 
[7]  Li, T.; Feng, T.T.; Gao, Z.H.; et al. “Hydraulic Performance and Optimal Structure Analysis of Deflector‑Type Sprinkler Nozzle.” J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng., 43 (3), 299-307. Jan. 2025.
 
[8]  Pyakurel, S.; Stock, N.M.; Jones, B.S.; et al. “Sprinkler Irrigation Timing Drives Water Loss Tradeoffs in an Urban, Semi-Arid Environment.” Irrig. Sci., 44 (2), 50-53. Feb. 2026.
 
[9]  Zheng, H.; Zheng, C.; Sun, C.; et al. “Corrigendum to “Micro-Sprinkler Irrigation with Optimal Irrigation Regimes Maintain Grain Yields While Increasing Carbon Emission Efficiency and Water Productivity of Winter Wheat on the North China Plain”.” Agric. Water Manag., 32 (3), 110065–110068. Mar. 2026.
 
[10]  Zhong, X.; Ge, M.; Tang, Z.; et al. “The Water Lifting Performance of a Photovoltaic Sprinkler Irrigation System Regulated by Solar‑Coupled Compressed‑Air Energy Storage.” Agriculture, 16 (2), 154. Jan. 2026.
 
[11]  Fu, S.H.; Ren, N.X.; Zhang, X.Z.; et al. “Design and Experiment of Variable‑Angle Variable Spray Device for Plant Protection UAV Based on Fruit Tree Canopy Recognition.” Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 57 (3), 47–56.Nov.2025.
 
[12]  Liu, X.M.; Ma, M.R.; Hou, X.W.; et al. “Research Status and Prospect of Gas‑Liquid Two‑Phase Flow Nozzle.” Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach., 56 (6), 296–318. Jun. 2025.
 
[13]  Yuan, W.W.; Wang, X.K.; Yan, H.L.; et al. “Structure Optimization of Jet Tee Based on Non‑Rotating Refractive Sprinkler.” J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng., 43 (2), 209–216. Jan. 2025.
 
[14]  Zhu, L.; Hui, X.; Yan, H.J.; et al. “Water Distribution Characteristics and Optimization of Different End Gun Combinations for Circular Sprinkler Irrigation System.” Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 41 (07), 42–51. Jan. 2025.
 
[15]  Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.C.; Zhu, D.L.; et al. “Calculation Method of Sprinkler Droplet Equivalent Indicators Based on Energy Weighting.” Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 40 (22), 69-78. Nov. 2024.
 
[16]  Wang, Z.X.; Jiang, Y.; Pan, X.W.; et al. “Design and Hydraulic Performance Test of Jet Impact Low‑Pressure Sprinkler.” Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 40 (6), 220–227. May. 2024.
 
[17]  Bonzi, L.; Carrara, M.; Hamouda, F.; et al. “Effect of Irrigation Uniformity on the Delineation of Homogeneous Zones in a Pear Orchard.” Agric. Water Manag., 32 (6), 110224–110229. Jun. 2026.
 
[18]  Liu, S.S.; Ma, X.; Wang, Y.W.; et al. “Design and Experiment of Variable‑Rate Sprinkler Irrigation Device for Water, Fertilizer and Pesticide in Rice Seedling Raising in Field.” Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng., 40 (13), 1–14. Aug. 2024.
 
[19]  Tang, Y.T.; Yang, S.X.; Yang, J.P.; et al. “Comprehensive Analysis of Influencing Factors on Sprinkler Irrigation Uniformity Based on Orthogonal Test Method.” J. Drain. Irrig. Mach. Eng., 40 (11), 1145–1150. Nov. 2022.
 
[20]  Li, H.Y.; Li, T.; Di, Y.H. “Effect of Nozzle Deflector of Impact Sprinkler on Hydraulic Performance and Its Optimization Evaluation.” J. Irrig.Drain., 44 (3). 34–45. Mar. 2025.
 
[21]  Deng, J.B. Optimization Design and Forming Accuracy of DIW Liquid Metal 3D Printing Nozzle Structure. Master’s Thesis, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China, 2024.