Management of Bacterial Wilt Using Grafting Technique in Tomato (Ralstonia solanacearum)

Sudeep Pandey^1, , Utsav Koirala², Prabin Acharya³ and Suchit Shrestha²

¹Department of Entomolgy, University of Georgia, Athens, USA

²Karma & Sons Traders Pvt. Ltd., Kathmandu, Nepal

³Institute of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Nepal

Cite this paper:
Sudeep Pandey, Utsav Koirala, Prabin Acharya and Suchit Shrestha. Management of Bacterial Wilt Using Grafting Technique in Tomato (Ralstonia solanacearum). World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020; 8(4):129-133. doi: 10.12691/wjar-8-4-4

Abstract

Tomato farmers have been facing a major threat of entire crop loss because of bacterial wilt of tomato. Grafting of highly productive scion onto resistant rootstock is one of the best methods to prevent crops from bacterial wilt disease. An experiment was conducted using tomato (RS-101) and eggplant (KER-DC-117) rootstocks grafted with six scion varieties in different combinations to make total of nine treatments replicated three times in completely randomized design in the naturally infected farmer’s fields at Dahachok, Nepal in 2019. All the three treatments with eggplant rootstock (KER-DC-117) were found to be resistant. Karma 777, Shrijana and Samjhana scions grafted onto tomato rootstock (RS-101) were moderately resistant, whereas Sarita and Karma 555 grafted onto tomato rootstock (RS-101) were moderately susceptible. Non-grafted Sarita was highly susceptible with 100% disease incidence. There were no bacterial browning and bacterial oozing in treatments with tomato rootstock (RS-101). The yield and number of fruits was maximum with Karma 444 grafted onto eggplant rootstock (KER-DC-117). So, Karma 444 + ER (KER-DC-117) is the best scion-rootstock combination to manage bacterial wilt against tomato at Dahachok, Kathmandu.

Keywords:
bacterial wilt of tomato resistant rootstock grafting management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	MoAD, Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture. Government of Nepal- Agribusiness Promotion and Statistics Division, Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2019-2020.
[2]	Agrios, G.N., Plant Pathology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2005.
[3]	Elphinstone J.G., The current bacterial wilt situation: a global overview. In: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex; Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC (eds), pp: 9-28. APS Press; St. Paul, MN, USA, 2005.
[4]	Husain, A., and Kelman, A., “Relation of slime production to mechanism of wilting and pathogenicity of Pseudomonas solanacearum,” Phytopathology, 48, 155-165, 1958.
[5]	Hayward, A., “Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum,” Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 29, 65-87, 1991.
[6]	Hayward, A. C., “Characteristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum,” J. Appl. Bacteriol. 27, 265-277, 1964.
[7]	Buddenhagen, I., and Kelman, A., Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 2, 203-230, 1964.
[8]	Driver, J., and Louws, F. J., “Fumigants and varieties to manage southern bacterial wilt of tomato,” in Annu. Int. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives Emissions Reductions, 228-232, 2002.
[9]	Wang, J. F., Hanson, P., and Barnes, J., “Worldwide evaluation of an international set of resistance sources to bacterial wilt in tomato,” in Bacterial Wilt Disease: Molecular and Ecological Aspects, P. Prior, C. Allen, and J. Elphinstone, eds. Springer, Verlag, Berlin, 269-275, 1998.
[10]	Shanner, G. and Finney, R.E., “The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in knox wheat,” Phytopathology, 67, 1051-1056, 1977.
[11]	Mew, T.W. and Ho, W.C., “Varietal resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato,” Plant Disease Reporter, 60(3), 204-208, 1976.
[12]	Elphinstone, J. G., Stanford, H. M. and Stead, D. E., Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in potato tubers, Solanum dulcamara, and associated irrigation water in Bacterial Wilt Disease: Molecular and Ecological. Aspects (Ed. Prior P, Allen C and Elphinstone J), Springer Verlag, Berlin German, 133-139, 1998.
[13]	Timila, R.D. and Shrestha, K., “Sources of resistance to bacterial wilt in tomato and its management approach,” in Proceedings of the First SAS/N Convention, 29-31 March 1999, Kathmandu. Society of Agricultural Scientists (SAS), Nepal, 161-167, 2001.
[14]	Timila, R.D. and Joshi, S., “Participatory evaluation of some tomato genotypes for resistance to bacterial wilt,” Nepal Agric. Res. J, 8, 50-55, 2007.
[15]	Yuliar, Nion, Y.A. and Toyota, K., “Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum,” Microbes Environ., 30, 1-11, 2015.
[16]	Rivard, C.L. and Louws, F.J., “Grafting to manage soilborne diseases in heirloom tomato production,” HortScience, 43, 2104-2111, 2008.
[17]	Rivard, C. L., O’Connell, S., Peet, M. M., Welker, R. M., and Louws, F. J., “Grafting tomato to manage bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in the southeastern United States,” Plant Dis., 96, 973-978, 2012.
[18]	Lin, C., Hsu, S., Tzeng, K., and Wang, J., “Application of a preliminary screen to select locally adapted resistant rootstock and soil amendment for integrated management of tomato bacterial wilt in Taiwan,” Plant Dis., 92, 909-916, 2008.
[19]	Din, N., Ahmad, M., Siddique, M., Ali, A., Naz, I., Ullah, N., Ahmad, F., “Phytobiocidal management of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith) Yabuuchi,” Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(3), 2016.